Any politician (or high profile celebrity for that matter) caught in any sort of "sex scandal" gets lots of media coverage. The accusations didn't just come out of the blue either. They followed the grab em by the pussy video. So what do you want CNN to do when women start coming out under these circumstances? Completely ignore it. Wanting the media to ignore something that would under any other circumstance cover is what is biased.
Just read his post. He can't be serious, surely?
JVS - 6
Honest people - 86
![]()
Does it feel weird that you're the only one in the entire section really defending CNN? Like, the rest of us are just sheep and you are truly enlightened?Obviously pro-Democratic and pro-Republican pundits hired by CNN are pro-Democratic or pro-Republican. That's different from the issue of institutional bias.
Where the hell is that ridiculous video of Wolf Blitzer claiming that Hillary mere "stumbles" on her way to the van, followed by the CNN panel harping about the blistering infernal in New York when Hillary's team said she "overheated" on that balmy and breezy 72 degrees autumn morning?
Does it feel weird that you're the only one in the entire section really defending CNN? Like, the rest of us are just sheep and you are truly enlightened?
That's because he founded ISIS people are divided on that one.Seriously, I create polls about whether Obama loved his country or not ... and they aren't even close to as one sided as this.
That's because he founded ISIS people are divided on that one.
Obviously after?!?! Weird question, are you trolling?...
......
.........
Really?
Did he do it before or after he grew up in Kenya?
I can post numerous videos of CNN selectively editing and lying by omission and having the feed be lost at opportune times to suggest that they are indeed highly biased.
Let's not forget how they suggested that Steve Bannon is a white supremacist and runs a fake news site.
These are all just off the top of my head.
Yeah, that's true. It was about maintaining the perception that the election was a fair contest and the perception that CNN wasn't biased.
I can post numerous videos of CNN selectively editing and lying by omission and having the feed be lost at opportune times to suggest that they are indeed highly biased.
Let's not forget how even to this very day almost every single segment that they have about Trump is a negative one.
These are all just off the top of my head.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/15/politics/marine-le-pen-interview-donald-trump/Nanterre, France (CNN)The leader of France's far-right National Front party, Marine Le Pen, says the US election of Donald Trump "shows that people are taking their future back," suggesting that French voters could do the same.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/09/politics/us-election-the-world-reacts/(CNN)Republican candidate Donald Trump's ascension to the White House has sent shock waves around the world. But it appears to have pleased one leader in particular: Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Within hours of Trump's victory speech early Wednesday, Putin congratulated the US president-electand flagged Moscow's willingness to restore ties fully with its old Cold War foe, currently at loggerheads over the Syrian conflict.
Obviously after?!?! Weird question, are you trolling?