I like this revisionist history about WW2 going on all over the place. It seems like people taking either side of the argument are greatly undervaluing the other.
I mean, you guys do remember that while Russia might have gotten to Berlin first (and lets ignore the fact that they didn't have to cross an OCEAN to get there), they did so against a Germany fending off the largest invasion in history from the other front. That invasion was set in motion by a country simultaneously fighting a war against another world power in an entirely different ocean.
I'm not trying to undersell Russia, obviously they played an equal, maybe greater role in defeating Germany. But I see a lot of European posters try to shit on the American role in WW2, and that does kind of get under my skin. Especially since western Europe pretty much sided with big brother America during the cold war for protection from the Soviet Union. And lets face it, if we weren't their flexing on your behalf Europe probably would have been taken over by the Soviet Union.
Damn you are an idiot. My grandfather fought the Japanese and was in Europe around D-Day time, and a great uncle I met fought the Germans. They both said the Soviets beat the Germans, while we did contribute, we were busy handling the Japanese.
The war was already going south for Germany by D-Day. After Stalingrad there was no way the Germans would win the war. They didn't have the manpower or resources.