- Joined
- Nov 12, 2005
- Messages
- 139,773
- Reaction score
- 43,584
u live in a fantasy world if u think u smacked anyone around in that thread........ur like skip bayless
u live in a fantasy world if u think u smacked anyone around in that thread........ur like skip bayless
Roy had tremendous athleticism to be sure, but to say that it was anything more than simply one facet of his enormously technical, intelligent game is fallacious. Take away the speed and you still had the tremendous ability to control range and cut off the ring, some of the most deceitful techniques for landing punches ever, world-class punch selection, awesome power, great work rate...Roy Jones Jr = Athleticism..
Hes one of the most entertaining fighter for me.
Don't be bitter that you got smacked around in the "overrated" thread.
I like Roy though. P4P, I'd absolutely rank him over Tyson. Considerably higher.
you're not very bright , are you ?
how is that post directed at you ? how is saying that only people who don't know shit about boxing would rank tyson over jones a jab at you ? jones was not even mentioned in the other thread....
not only you didn't smack anyone around in the other thread ( or anywhere, ever...) , but saying that i'm bitter because of it is absolutely laughable. the trivial conversations i have here don't come close to trigger that sort of emotions in real life .
sometimes you can emit a very detestable vibe , i wonder if you're like this in real life....
Thats hurtful.
Grow up. I was kidding around obviously. If you can't handle a discussion without getting butthurt, then get lost..
a lesson on handling a discussion , and growing up ..... from you ?
if you can't continue a civil discussion that started in a good atmosphere without running around to a completly different thread ,provoking the other person , trolling for a reaction , and declaring yourself the winner of an ongoing debate that takes place in another thread ....then discussing with you will become very tiresome.
Yes, from me. I never have to resort to calling people names because my argument sucks, like you.
It WAS a civil discussion, you started the name calling, genius.
Name calling, insulting me. Semantics. You get mad because you can't win the argument and insult me. I've seen it here before. Your argument sucked, I didn't realize you had taken it personally, made an obvious joke and then you started insulting me.
Question my intelligence all you like, your argument still sucked.
Tyson is an ATG. How great is personal opinion.
Sure it is.yet strangely , in the actual thread where the discussion took place, there is no inuslts, no name calling ,nothing. just a slightly condescending tone from you.
my reaction here was directed at your chilidish remarks . how you declared yourself the winner of the argument, and remarked that you " smacked me " around when my post was not even direcred at you .
it wasn't a joke, clearly in your little fantasy world , you believed that i was so butthurt that i came here to vent my frsutration and take a jab at you , when in reality you didn't come close to winning the argument yourself.
arguments such as " holmes is holmes " and numerous rationalizations on how beating someone coming off two losses and a two years lay off is comparable to beating the reigning heavyweight champion are hardly arguments that'll get me " mad " or butthurt .
that's just your projection.
That lead right hand was a thing of beauty. Who do you think has a faster lead right-Roy Jones or Mayweather?
It's all good brothers, I'll apologize for both of you. No harm or foul.
Tyson is an ATG. How great is personal opinion.
Seano and Farfan are bit fat poopy faces.