The future of finishes

[Thawing Mammoth]

So I just had a vision of the future of MMA:

It should be legal to kill your opponent. When the fights ends the ref just tells the winner that he's won. He doesn't separate the fighters at this point. Now the winner can do what he wants. If he's a good guy, he spares his opponent. If he wants to fuckin kill him, he can do that too.

This will be much better for drama. The crowds will love the killing and they will love the gentlemen who spare their opponents. The death of a beloved fighter will be a great tragedy.

Dana is probably connected allegedly so he can get the legal stuff worked out. This is also kinda like they did it in Rome so there's precedent.

Thank you for your time

PS the winner should also get the loser's remains so they can stuff them or build a skull wall or whatever DS

EDIT: Decisions would stay the same though I guess (since the loser can't be expected to just sit there and let the winner kill them) so they would still suck

 

[BFoe]

Good luck booking endless immediate rematches.

 

[Thawing Mammoth]

Good luck booking endless immediate rematches.

That's what I'm sayyyyyin you can't rematch a guy who's dead

 

[Travis Alexander]

I’m not trying to see what Izzy does to his lifeless opponents post mortem…

 

[Neck&Neck]

 

[Will G]

 

[Thawing Mammoth]

You're posting that like it's a bad thing

 

[chaos_36]

It would be one way to stop rematches.

 

[Fahcough]

Glass on the mat to stop butt scooting?

 

[Clark Rogers]

 

[IloveTHIS]

Ts need to be on a watch list

 

[Thawing Mammoth]

Glass on the mat to stop butt scooting?

If you're in a fight to the death and you start butt scootin, more power to ya

 

[baba2008]

Good luck booking endless immediate rematches.

 

[markantony20]

Smuggle knives inside your cup/sports bra and fuck shut up!!

 

[ChimRichalds]

Good luck booking endless immediate rematches.

 

[goOb]

So I just had a vision of the future of MMA:

It should be legal to kill your opponent. When the fights ends the ref just tells the winner that he's won. He doesn't separate the fighters at this point. Now the winner can do what he wants. If he's a good guy, he spares his opponent. If he wants to fuckin kill him, he can do that too.

This will be much better for drama. The crowds will love the killing and they will love the gentlemen who spare their opponents. The death of a beloved fighter will be a great tragedy.

Dana is probably connected allegedly so he can get the legal stuff worked out. This is also kinda like they did it in Rome so there's precedent.

Thank you for your time

PS the winner should also get the loser's remains so they can stuff them or build a skull wall or whatever DS

EDIT: Decisions would stay the same though I guess (since the loser can't be expected to just sit there and let the winner kill them) so they would still suck

If a fight ends in a decision both fighters are sacrificed.

 

[kingofthecans]

EDIT: Decisions would stay the same though I guess (since the loser can't be expected to just sit there and let the winner kill them) so they would still suck

So basically more fights will go to a decision.....
<{Red Card}>

 

[TankAbbott4Eva]

So I just had a vision of the future of MMA:

It should be legal to kill your opponent. When the fights ends the ref just tells the winner that he's won. He doesn't separate the fighters at this point. Now the winner can do what he wants. If he's a good guy, he spares his opponent. If he wants to fuckin kill him, he can do that too.

This will be much better for drama. The crowds will love the killing and they will love the gentlemen who spare their opponents. The death of a beloved fighter will be a great tragedy.

Dana is probably connected allegedly so he can get the legal stuff worked out. This is also kinda like they did it in Rome so there's precedent.

Thank you for your time

PS the winner should also get the loser's remains so they can stuff them or build a skull wall or whatever DS

EDIT: Decisions would stay the same though I guess (since the loser can't be expected to just sit there and let the winner kill them) so they would still suck

 

[Vegesus44]

Congratulations on making the dumbest fucking thread Sherdog has ever seen.

 

[notsojollyrogerRIP]

So I just had a vision of the future of MMA:

It should be legal to kill your opponent. When the fights ends the ref just tells the winner that he's won. He doesn't separate the fighters at this point. Now the winner can do what he wants. If he's a good guy, he spares his opponent. If he wants to fuckin kill him, he can do that too.

This will be much better for drama. The crowds will love the killing and they will love the gentlemen who spare their opponents. The death of a beloved fighter will be a great tragedy.

Dana is probably connected allegedly so he can get the legal stuff worked out. This is also kinda like they did it in Rome so there's precedent.

Thank you for your time

PS the winner should also get the loser's remains so they can stuff them or build a skull wall or whatever DS

EDIT: Decisions would stay the same though I guess (since the loser can't be expected to just sit there and let the winner kill them) so they would still suck

A skull wall, lol.

The post-fight press conference would be 50% shorter for some strange reason.