- Joined
- Jun 14, 2009
- Messages
- 70,477
- Reaction score
- 106,696
Really good post man.Criteria:
- Number of top ten opponents at Heavyweight.
- Time spent ranked as a top five fighter in the Heavyweight Division
- Only listing #1-10 Heavyweight ranked opponents in candidates' resumes.
Honorable Mention - Cain Velasquez
![]()
Velasquez' resume:
#3 Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira
#1 Brock Lesnar
#9 Antonio Silva
#1 Junior dos Santos
#3 Antonio Silva
#2 Junior dos Santos
#8 Travis Browne
Velasquez defeated seven, top ten opponents.
Velasquez was ranked in the top five from 1/1/10 to 1/1/15 and 7/1/15 to 10/1/17 for a combined total of 7 years and 3 months.
The overly redundant resume and the fact that a large portion of the time that Velasquez was ranked in the top five he was inactive due to injury, is why he gets only an honorable mention.
#5 - Fabricio Werdum
![]()
Werdum's resume:
#4 Gabriel Gonzaga
#1 Fedor Emelianenko
#5 Travis Browne
#5 Mark Hunt
#1 Cain Velasquez
#8 Travis Browne
Werdum defeated six, top ten opponents.
Werdum was ranked in the top five from 4/1/08 to 10/1/08, 7/1/10 to 10/1/11, 4/1/12 to 1/1/13, 7/1/13 to 4/1/18 for a combined total of 7 years and 3 months.
#4 - Stipe Miocic
![]()
Miocic's resume:
#5 Mark Hunt
#3 Andrei Arlovski
#1 Fabricio Werdum
#3 Alistair Overeem
#5 Junior dos Santos
#2 Francis Ngannou
#1 Daniel Cormier
Miocic defeated seven, top ten opponents.
Miocic was ranked in the top five from 4/1/14 to 7/1/14 and 4/1/15 to Today for a combined total of 4 years and 11 months.
#3 - Junior dos Santos
![]()
dos Santos' resume:
#4 Fabricio Werdum
#9 Mirko Filipovic
#6 Shane Carwin
#1 Cain Velasquez
#4 Frank Mir
#9 Mark Hunt
#6 Ben Rothwell
#4 Derrick Lewis
dos Santos defeated eight, top ten opponents.
dos Santos was ranked in the top five from 10/1/09 to 4/1/10, 10/1/10 to 1/1/16, 7/1/16 to 1/1/18, and 4/1/19 to Today for a combined total of 7 years and 11 months.
#2 - Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira
![]()
Nogueira's resume:
#5 Valentijn Overeem
#5 Gary Goodridge
#3 Mark Coleman
#6 Ricco Rodriguez
#5 Mirko Filipovic
#10 Heath Herring
#9 Fabricio Werdum
#3 Josh Barnett
#9 Tim Sylvia
#5 Randy Couture
Nogueira defeated ten, top ten opponents.
Nogueira was ranked in the top five from 4/1/01 to 1/1/10 for a combined total of 8 years and 9 months.
#1 - Fedor Emelianenko
![]()
Emelianenko's resume:
#8 Renato Sobral
#6 Semmy Schilt
#1 Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira
#9 Gary Goodridge
#9 Mark Coleman
#7 Kevin Randleman
#2 Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira
#4 Mirko Filipovic
#4 Mark Coleman
#7 Mark Hunt
#8 Tim Sylvia
#6 Andrei Arlovski
#8 Brett Rogers
Emelianenko defeated thirteen, top ten opponents.
Emelianenko was ranked in the top five from 4/1/02 to 1/1/11 for a combined total of 8 years and 9 months.
For those who will undoubtedly ask about Daniel Cormier:
Cormier's resume:
#6 Antonio Silva
#8 Josh Barnett
#7 Frank Mir
#1 Stipe Miocic
#5 Derrick Lewis
Cormier defeated five, top ten opponents.
Cormier was ranked in the top five from 7/1/12 to 1/1/14 and 10/1/18 to Today for a combined total of 2 years and 8 months.
Cormier has the least amount of top ten wins and the shortest amount of time spent in the top five rankings out of everyone in this list (including Velasquez).
To be fair, taking a year off to gain 50lbs of depression would have a negative impact on most athletes' career trajectory.Pretty hard to believe Tim Sylvia was still ranked #8, considering his next fight after Fedor he got KTFO by a 50 year old ex-boxer lmao.
How is me citing their historical rankings equate to me agreeing with their all-time rankings?Oh, fightmatrix.
So you, for example, agree with let's say, Mirko being 17th HW of all time?
Thanks. And the changes to your AV made me chuckle.I appreciate the thread @acannxr . Good stuff.
Thank you, glad you enjoyed it.Really good post man.
Interesting and well researched in regards to content and criteria and visually appealing as well.
Sylvia also had the bizarre gameplan of trying to strike with a boxer instead of immediately going for a takedown...To be fair, taking a year off to gain 50lbs of depression would have a negative impact on most athletes' career trajectory.
Interesting take.
I'd personnaly go with:
1- Fedor
2- Stipe
3- Cormier
4/5 (tie) Cain and JDS
Well, you use that rankings to count top 10 wins, but to be honest, they suck. I just posted one example of why they suck, and there are many more.How is me citing their historical rankings equate to me agreeing with their all-time rankings?
Your example is in reference to their all-time rankings, not their historical rankings.Well, you use that rankings to count top 10 wins, but to be honest, they suck. I just posted one example of why they suck, and there are many more.
Did he though? Look at them now. Look at them over the last 5 years. Since Cain won the rubber match in 2013, he's gone 1-2 with only 3 fights and now he's a pro wrestler. Meanwhile JDS has gone 5-3 and will be fighting Blaydes next month.
JDS has the better resume. All time rankings can't just factor in head to head matchups.
Cain won head to head but JDS had big wins in the division while cain was out hurt.
I just don't see how anyone can vote against Fedor at #1. The thing to consider and I feel gets overlooked the most is the division. The heavyweight division has always been consistently inconsistent, look at almost any great heavyweight fighter and you will see scattered loses, mostly upsets. So when you consider that Fedor was basically undefeated for 30 plus fights and 10 plus years in the hardest division to be consistent in, he wins by a landslide.
The problem with this way of ranking is
1. it doesn’t matter how you got a win as long as you got it. So a split decision is the same as a convincing KO
2. There’s no context. Context is really important. For example, a win over a #3 ranked Conor McGregor in January will not be nearly as impressive as the khabib win even though he’s only 2 ranks lower the reality is that until we see him fight in January we have no idea how good he is. So he could be a rank 3 type of guy. Or 1. Or 12. We don’t know. But that kind of context is missing from the considerations.
3. it’s not accounting for losses. So your only looking at who they beat and how high they were ranked, not consecutive wins, or win/loss ratios etc.
Though I will say the thread is beautiful and well put together
Jones would beat them all tho
JDS: 1-3 in UFC title fights (two of those losses to Cain)
Cain: 3-1 in UFC title fights (two of those wins vs. JDS)
JDS is a great fighter. Cain was just greater and I say this as a guy who rooted hard for JDS three times vs. Cain.
Title fights aren't the only consideration. There's also how each fighter did vs the rest of the field. JDS has a much deeper resume over the same period of time. Even now that cain is completely done jds is still fighting and getting decent wins.JDS: 1-3 in UFC title fights (two of those losses to Cain)
Cain: 3-1 in UFC title fights (two of those wins vs. JDS)
JDS is a great fighter. Cain was just greater and I say this as a guy who rooted hard for JDS three times vs. Cain.