Social The daily "AOC says something stupid on Twitter" thread.

[GrandNewb]

AOC said her lowest paid staffer will get $52k and top staffer no more than $80k. With 18 staff plus interns at $15hr she'll broke in six months. Not to mention her D-lux apartment in the sky.
This nit-wit is going to have to rotate the dumbest staffers in and out as top staffers generally earn $150k, she's paying half to hers.
I hope she kept her apron.

I'm sure she looked at the "facts" and "details" carefully before she came up with those numbers. But I mean, shouldn't we be focused on investing in human capital before worrying about the costs?

 

[GrandNewb]

Oh, and it seems like a certain mod took away my ability to directly reply to other posts. So I have to do this shit manually now. I wonder which mod did that. Perhaps the one who only censors those who disagree with him? Hmmm.

 

[Contra-dictator]

You’re insecure about your level of education.

Your posts read like a daily stormer article.

You parrot insults you heard on 4chan.

You keep responding even though every post you claim to be done.

You’re taking all of this way too personally.

You’re a little bitch who reports people for being mean to him on a karate forum.

There isn’t a single poster on this forum who doesn’t think you’re in a fit of rage over this thread.

But please, continue.

Please, don't be too hard on Pain in the South. I'm afraid he's near his limit!<[analyzed}>

 

[GrandNewb]

I understand. Which is why I put him on my ignore list. I normally don't insult retards, but he was a special exception. And mod panamaican encourages escalating insults rather than escalating civil conversation and substantive debating.

Again, I can't reply directly to you because a certain mod took away my ability to directly reply to posts.

 

[Contra-dictator]

I understand. Which is why I put him on my ignore list. I normally don't insult retards, but he was a special exception. And mod panamaican encourages escalating insults rather than escalating civil conversation and substantive debating.

Again, I can't reply directly to you because a certain mod took away my ability to directly reply to posts.

Gee, I wonder who?

 

[Contra-dictator]

I understand. Which is why I put him on my ignore list. I normally don't insult retards, but he was a special exception. And mod panamaican encourages escalating insults rather than escalating civil conversation and substantive debating.

Again, I can't reply directly to you because a certain mod took away my ability to directly reply to posts.

I wonder if Pain in His South is...um.... behind it?

 

[Contra-dictator]

I understand. Which is why I put him on my ignore list. I normally don't insult retards, but he was a special exception. And mod panamaican encourages escalating insults rather than escalating civil conversation and substantive debating.

Again, I can't reply directly to you because a certain mod took away my ability to directly reply to posts.

I wonder if there might be a way we could use impairment to our advantage? Maybe we are to communicate in an inelegant manner only?

 

[GrandNewb]

I wonder if there might be a way we could use impairment to our advantage? Maybe we are to communicate in an inelegant manner only?

Hey! My reply button is back. That was fast. Thanks whichever mod gave me back full access! And thanks to you, pan, for putting me in my little time-out. I'm glad you felt the need to teach me a lesson while allowing others to continue to troll this thread!

 

[Contra-dictator]

Hey! My reply button is back. That was fast. Thanks whichever mod gave me back full access! And thanks to you, pan, for putting me in my little time-out. I'm glad you felt the need to teach me a lesson while allowing others to continue to troll this thread!

Kool! What up Grand?

 

[King in the North]

Please, don't be too hard on Pain in the South. I'm afraid he's near his limit!<[analyzed}>

I wonder if Pain in His South is...um.... behind it?

I ain’t even mad because “Pain in His South” is pretty funny. Well played.

Also tell that little bitch to unblock me. I thought we were having a good time.

 

[KeepItRealist]

Media have resorted to running videos of her petting a dog to cover up the stupid shit she says.

 

[King in the North]

Again, that's your projection. Not mine. I'm fine with my advanced degree.

What's a "daily stormer?" I'm assuming it's some Trump related publication? Again, projection. If you have any examples comparing my posts to this "daily stormer," please post them. Just one post can validate you. But I'm betting you can't because I honestly don't even know what "daily stormer" is. What excuse are you going to come up with for this? Or are you just going to ignore it like all the other posts because you're too unintelligent to make a proper substantive response?

I have heard of 4chan. And it's funny how you use the term "parrot" after I used it on you. So guess who is parroting who?

Actually, I never claimed to be done. Please show me where I said I am not going to respond to you specifically. Previously, I said I was not going to respond to the troll panamaican. But you are a special, little bitch, aren't you? Oh, you must be projecting again. Thinking you're not going to respond to me, but you keep coming back like the little bitch that you are.

Again, projection. I don't give a damn. It's impossible for me to take this personally because you mean absolutely nothing to me. But I enjoy a good laugh once in a while like when someone sees your obsession with dicks because of your micropenis.

Hiyaah! Whoa! Great comeback after insulting me out of left field!

Again, the word of the day for you to learn is "projection." It's a psychological term. Go google it. You may actually learn something if that's possible for that retard brain of yours.

I just did. Thanks for the laughs, but I'm going to have to put you on my ignore list.

I know. I know. You're going to come back and parrot back what others said in your vain attempt to insult me and have the last word. It's fine. I'll just keep reading AOC's tweets for my daily dose of retard humor rather than read your posts.

Good luck with your retarded life, little bitch.

Your GED isn’t an advanced degree. I’ve never seen a user more shook. This knuckle dragger is on one.

 

[PEB]

 

[jeffk]

While AOC is talked about a lot on the Internet because both the right and new left like to talk about her these pragmatic Democrats will likely be the future of the Democratic Party.

https://t.co/MweRI3RgVU
These pragmatic Democrats accounted for some of the flipped Republican seats that gave their party control of the House. The progressive wing of the party may be potent, but many of its victories came in reliably Democratic seats, such as the Bronx-Queens district in New York that elected Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a charismatic media favorite.

A good showcase for these new Democrats is the House Armed Services Committee. The Democrats installed 14 freshmen on the panel, nearly half of their party’s total membership.

Seven have served in the military, Foreign Service or CIA, and 10 are women. If you’re looking for bright new faces in the Democratic Party, this may be the most compelling group snapshot.

 

[GrandNewb]

There's a lot said in here, but I would like address a few points that I think are arguable.

1. "AOC doesn't deserve credit on Amazon pulling out."
Perhaps. But there's no denying that she was very vocal about denouncing the already in place deal which riled up a boisterous minority.
By constantly tweeting about how Amazon is evil and making it a talking point in all of the many interviews she did, she certainly influenced her fanbase to protest the deal.

2. "The people there did not want Amazon coming in."
Obviously, the vocal minority did not want Amazon there. But a survey by the Siena College showed that the majority of New Yorkers wanted Amazon there. I quoted the statistics in a previous post, but there's no denying that the majority of NY voters and the vast majority of minority voters in NY wanted Amazon to come into their neighborhood. Why does AOC and her supporters not address this? And since AOC seems to differentiate between "real" New York and "not real" New York, the responses to the survey were from actual, real New York voters. Some may argue that there were going to be detriments to the neighborhood with a gigantic corporation moving their headquarters in there. But, like AOC seemingly claims, isn't that for the local communities to decide? Whatever the trade-offs may be for Amazon coming into their neighborhood, the local NYers already knew about the deal and approved the deal by an overwhelming majority. So why does AOC consider it such a great victory that Amazon pulled out when the "real" NYers who actually live and vote there wanted Amazon to come in?

3. "Dark money."
AOC loves to talk about dark money, and she addressed this in a congressional hearing with the IRS. But why does AOC and her supporters conveniently overlook the fact that her chief of staff (who is a silicon valley millionaire) was hired by her after he paid for her campaign? And what about the fact that her boyfriend was paid by this millionaire campaign contributor/chief of staff as the sole "marketing consultant?" Will AOC be addressing her own dark money issues or is it only dark money when Republicans do it?

4. "You need those jobs to push for the GND."
Ok, so the argument seems to be that in order to fund the GND, new jobs need to be created. So why was AOC so against Amazon bringing in 25,000 new jobs to NY? The argument seems to be that the numbers were "extremely optimistic." OK. Even if it's not 25,000, let's say it's only 20,000 or even 15,000. These are high tech, high paying jobs that Amazon was going to bring to the city of NY. The majority of these jobs were going to have salaries starting in the six figures. Even the mayor, de Blasio, lamented that Amazon was losing out on the tech talent of NY by pulling out of this deal. So why is it a good thing that AOC and her fans drove those jobs away when new high paying jobs are necessary to fund the GND?

 

[Mr. Shickadance]

This thread just proves how scared the right is of AOC and its amazing, she is so young she will be ruining you guys for years!!!!

 

[GrandNewb]

This thread just proves how scared the right is of AOC and its amazing, she is so young she will be ruining you guys for years!!!!

Thanks for substantiating your post with facts and valid, coherent arguments in response to the criticisms of AOC's statements instead of repeating the same pointless logical fallacies that others have. Things are much clearer for everyone now. AOC needs more supporters like you.

 

[Mr. Shickadance]

Thanks for substantiating your post with facts and valid, coherent arguments in response to the criticisms of AOC's statements instead of repeating the same pointless logical fallacies that others have. Things are much clearer for everyone now. AOC needs more supporters like you.

your welcome i love touching people's hearts

 

[Seano]

This thread just proves how scared the right is of AOC and its amazing, she is so young she will be ruining you guys for years!!!!

Some of you need to get laid, badly.

 

[Mr. Shickadance]

Thanks for substantiating your post with facts and valid, coherent arguments in response to the criticisms of AOC's statements instead of repeating the same pointless logical fallacies that others have. Things are much clearer for everyone now. AOC needs more supporters like you.

But for real the facts of what I am saying are so obvious they don't need to be substantatied by any source it is like saying the sky is blue. I mean i guess I could google how many right wing articles are about her, not less a week and it is amazing. the impact she has is very little but the hit party is already on her. give her time and powerful people will step behind this star and their worst nightmares will become true because they gave this person too much attention. Learn lessons from CNN trump supporters because most of the un-cult like have