The American Gun Rights Thread Vol. 3

[BVG]

Just when I think that you couldn't prove yourself to be anymore of a buffoon with no credibility and just emotions you have to tell me to "right" something.

Just what meds does your nanny state have you on?

Cut me some slack fella, I'm at work and typing fast. You hung that spelling mistake yo! You've earned it!

 

[BVG]

Guns are like a seatbelt. You can't look back after a car accident and say to yourself "wish I would have wore my seatbelt" if you want to live.

The Pandora's Box of firearms in the US means that I get to reserve the right to a level playing field. If criminal predator type people are going to get their hands on guns I reserve the right to superior firepower.

As far as ARs and tactical shit - It isn't even the problem. The vast amount of firearms violence is with handguns.

I think it's possible to shut the box. I already stated if I lived in the States, I wouldn't arm myself because of criminals, I'd arm myself because you've armed yourself.

 

[SMEAC]

Cut me some slack fella, I'm at work and typing fast. You hung that spelling mistake yo! You've earned it!

Why would anyone ever cut you some slack

 

[BVG]

Why would anyone ever cut you some slack

Like I'd honestly care if you did? Lol?

You are like part hick, along with the other 5 hicks that post in this thread that require guns to sleep at night. Trying desperately to cut down a Canadian who pointed out that design follows function and that thier is a fucking difference combat wise between these two guns with regards to use in a combat situation...

You should have just said, "yeah...theirs a difference" but nope...we had to dance around this fact for 20 plus pages and in the end, I'm still right...one is better suited for hunting, the other combat. however slight...that's just the facts.

Deal with it.

Are we done here? Can this thread die or do you still wanna try to tell me otherwise?

 

[UpaLoompa]

You haven't effectively rebutted the points made in that photo. I know you think you have but people actually knowledgeable about shooting have clearly explained why you're wrong.

Gun advocates often make bad arguments (I commented on one earlier in the thread) but your arguments have been worse.

 

[SMEAC]

I haven't said anything about differences canuck, I know nothing about all this tactical stuff you are attempting to refer to. I want you to use all your vast combat experience over me to tell me the virtues of different grips.

 

[BVG]

You haven't effectively rebutted the points made in that photo. I know you think you have but people actually knowledgeable about shooting have clearly explained why you're wrong.

Gun advocates often make bad arguments (I commented on one earlier in the thread) but your arguments have been worse.

I'm not arguing the the points in that photo...

 

[oldshadow]

Like I'd honestly care if you did? Lol?

You are like part hick, along with the other 5 hicks that post in this thread that require guns to sleep at night. Trying desperately to cut down a Canadian who pointed out that design follows function and that thier is a fucking difference combat wise between these two guns with regards to use in a combat situation...

You should have just said, "yeah...theirs a difference" but nope...we had to dance around this fact for 20 plus pages and in the end, I'm still right...one is better suited for hunting, the other combat. however slight...that's just the facts.

Deal with it.

Are we done here? Can this thread die or do you still wanna try to tell me otherwise?

Actually if I had my choice it would be this.

 

[UpaLoompa]

I'm not arguing the the points in that photo...

Your position has been that there is a difference in those weapons that extends past aesthetics.

 

[BVG]

I haven't said anything about differences canuck, I know nothing about all this tactical stuff you are attempting to refer to. I want you to use all your vast combat experience over me to tell me the virtues of different grips.

My arguments were backed up by websites.forums (where gun owners are not trying desperately to prove the Canadian wrong...) and some gun range owner in this very thread...along with various swat and military photos showcasing the posture used when they are being tactical.

I'm right.

Sokay...don't sweat it. It's not the first time I've been right...and it's not the last.

 

[BVG]

Actually if I had my choice it would be this.

But this isn't about your choice...and the entire world's infantry disagrees with it, btw...

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

Are we done here? Can this thread die or do you still wanna try to tell me otherwise?

You can stop posting here any time and I'll continue to update the thread with news as it relates to guns in politics.

 

[BVG]

Your position has been that there is a difference in those weapons that extends past aesthetics.

Yes...one isn't designed that way because it looks cool.

Designed followed function.

Even that one schmuck said that he owns 30 guns and each serves a specific purpose that specializes with different uses.

 

[SMEAC]

My arguments were backed up by websites.forums (where gun owners are not trying desperately to prove the Canadian wrong...) and some gun range owner in this very thread...along with various swat and military photos showcasing the posture used when they are being tactical.

I'm right.

Sokay...don't sweat it. It's not the first time I've been right...and it's not the last.

So you gleaned all your combat knowledge and the benefits of the pistol grip and the vertical fore grip from some internet bloggers and pictures?

And you think that makes you correct in this case?

So yet again, go on about all your vast experience with gunfighting and combat?

 

[UpaLoompa]

Yes...one isn't designed that way because it looks cool.

But it is designed "that" way, the bottom picture is how it is designed. Those are pretty much all after market modifications.

 

[BVG]

You can stop posting here any time and I'll continue to update the thread with news as it relates to guns in politics.

You stop replying and I'll go away

 

[BVG]

So you gleaned all your combat knowledge and the benefits of the pistol grip and the vertical fore grip from some internet bloggers and pictures?

And you think that makes you correct in this case?

So yet again, go on about all your vast experience with gunfighting and combat?

I think the entire world's infantry and tactical officers using this style of gun makes me right.



What you got? personal opinion?

 

[BVG]

But it is designed "that" way, the bottom picture is how it is designed. Those are pretty much all after market modifications.

one design is clearly favored for infantry combat...cool huh?

 

[UpaLoompa]

one design is clearly favored for infantry combat...cool huh?

For reasons that posters more knowledgeable than I clarified which you pretty much ignored and don't support your point.

 

[SMEAC]

I think the entire world's infantry and tactical officers using this style of gun makes me right.



What you got? personal opinion?

I think all the of kings men wouldn't make you right at anything

So again, tell me about all your infantry experience?
As a canuckian why don't you tell me about panjwai since you are so well versed in combat