- Joined
- Feb 4, 2015
- Messages
- 16,111
- Reaction score
- 7,411
Lol noYoel Romero
Lol noYoel Romero
For longevity, NEVER point-fighting, challenging and accepting challenges from the best of the best, regardless of size and weight, Dan Henderson.
Far beyond the UFC, his Entire Career is what my comment is based on.
You have to compare prime vs prime, or only consider people’s who’s careers are over, because you’re holding post-prime losses against retired fighters while guys like Izzy haven’t hit that decline yet.
Case in point people had Woodley as a top 2 WW at his peak after the Till fight, then he loses 6 in a row and has a raccoon bite his dick off in a movie, now nobody even considers him in a top 5 WW GOAT conversation. Izzy might go on a skid like that when Father Time catches him, so it’s unfair to compare him at his peak vs other guys who got old and lost fights they shouldn’t.
Hahah just you can't even make this stuff up.
Never point fighting?
For along time his nickname was "decision dan"
Fair enough. I wasn’t specific enough in the OP. I’m enjoying seeing people point out that there is a difference between a fighter from MW and a fighter at MW. Peoples understanding of MMA is pleasantly nuanced sometimes, you gotta get it just right
Izzy has the higher fight IQ between the two of them. He’s more crafty and disciplined than ole H Bomb
Not sure Dan wouldn’t be able to get him down though
From what I remember that nickname didn't come from going to decisions a lot, it came from winning decisions he shouldn't have.
Never point fighting? For along time his nickname was "decision dan"
You want to hold Anderson's losses (when he was in his 40's) against him????This. I think he tears Hendo apart worse than Anderson did.
That being said, due to the end of career losses
Peak: Anderson > Izzy
Overall resume: Izzy > Anderson
Anderson had a lot of losses that weren't bad due to who they were against. But between that tailspin at the end and the PED's, Izzy really should be regarded above him.
You want to hold Anderson's losses (when he was in his 40's) against him????
He lost the title to Weidman when he was 38 in like his 38th fight. Everyone's title reign has to end some day. Doesn't erase all his prior accomplishments. He still won like 17 fights in a row. If Anderson retired before he fought Weidman would you think differently? It makes no difference to me. I actually have more respect that he kept on fighting instead of quitting the sport while on top.
Israel is still in his 30's. We will see if he continues fighting until his mid 40's like Anderson did.
With respect, it's possible you've seen more of Hendo's fights than I have. Even if his nickname was "decision dan", our conception of a point fighter may differ, because I always considered him one to do his best to end fights without "leaving it to the judges".
You want to hold Anderson's losses (when he was in his 40's) against him????
He lost the title to Weidman when he was 38 in like his 38th fight. Everyone's title reign has to end some day. Doesn't erase all his prior accomplishments. He still won like 17 fights in a row. If Anderson retired before he fought Weidman would you think differently? It makes no difference to me. I actually have more respect that he kept on fighting instead of quitting the sport while on top.
Israel is still in his 30's. We will see if he continues fighting until his mid 40's like Anderson did.