- Joined
- Nov 21, 2005
- Messages
- 8,167
- Reaction score
- 151
Another Munson, TrumphungTrump=hung like Carson![]()
Another Munson, TrumphungTrump=hung like Carson![]()
You mean how communist China has to lend money to Capitalist USA and make the citizens pay the interest?
It blows me away that people just can't understand that the uber rich have fleeced everyone by paying lobbyists and politicians to make policy for them for $$$ benefit, and they did it while making you think it was ok, in fact defending it.
i didnt mean to insinuate you are poor, sorry if thats how it came off. - i just used two hypothetical situations, but one citizen is not responsible for the economical well being of another, especially when they are already paying 1/5th (at the hypothetical rate of 20%) of their income and they are not using as much of the system.
Even if that person has extra / discretionary income 500000x more than they ever need, its still there money and the government is fleecing them by mandating a higher percentage to be implemented on to them
again, the rich are not responsible for the poor.
lol me and my coworkers talked about this when he went around saying con-man, I said we'll see who is a con-man when you have to support the nominee because you pledged to
You want to ignore the history of the robber barons, great depression, and labor movement, and that is why your nominee is Donald Trump.
Have opinions with the depth of a puddle, and get candidates that reflect that.
You mean how communist China has to lend money to Capitalist USA and make the citizens pay the interest?
It blows me away that people just can't understand that the uber rich have fleeced everyone by paying lobbyists and politicians to make policy for them for $$$ benefit, and they did it while making you think it was ok, in fact defending it.
Your perception of economics and the historical (and current) creation of capital is so insanely rudimentary.
China is far more capitalistic than the US - despite you falling for labels.
If the rich can manipulate the system in their favor, oh well. They are still not responsible for the poor just like the poor are not responsible for the rich.
Crony capitalism you mean.
i didnt mean to insinuate you are poor, sorry if thats how it came off. - i just used two hypothetical situations, but one citizen is not responsible for the economical well being of another, especially when they are already paying 1/5th (at the hypothetical rate of 20%) of their income and they are not using as much of the system.
Even if that person has extra / discretionary income 500000x more than they ever need, its still there money and the government is fleecing them by mandating a higher percentage to be implemented on to them
again, the rich are not responsible for the poor.
Did you learn this at Trump University?China is far more capitalistic than the US - despite you falling for labels.
If the rich can manipulate the system in their favor, oh well. They are still not responsible for the poor just like the poor are not responsible for the rich.
Did you learn this at Trump University?
chinas entire structure is to maximize profit with limiting social aide.
The US has far more regulatory implements - but yeah, people scam the system to their favor. But, so do some poor people with social welfare - cant avoid it on any level.
I'll never understand why people defend the pockets of the rich so vehemently. Why? Fairness? Fuck them. When the courts are cured of affluenza then perhaps I'll find a fraction of a fuck to give for the wealthy.
so who came out on top in this one?
"while limiting social aide" ? Do you mean social welfare, or social networking? China is all about the networking. All the rich people are relatives of party officials.