- Joined
- Jul 3, 2007
- Messages
- 26,854
- Reaction score
- 8,452
Got a video instead brother...slam K.O
I agree that's a perfect slam
Got a video instead brother...slam K.O
What a pissy reply, are you saying there was no skill involved in this slamSlam Ko's are great. Headbutt KO's not so much. If you just like to see KO's regardless of skill or not just watch stupid kids playing the KO game on youtube.
It looks like the impact of the head on the mat might have caused the KO, but the heads definitely touched -
![]()
I wonder if there is an official definition of "clash" and if this would meet the criteria.
He absolutely smashed his head off the mat...the head impact was secondary and not as hard as the floor impact... .
He also went limp almost immediately after hitting the floor which makes the elbows even worse
He absolutely smashed his head off the mat...the head impact was secondary and not as hard as the floor impact... .
He also went limp almost immediately after hitting the floor which makes the elbows even worse
OK Brawk! Go have a Coors Light and calm down.
The Tito vs Evans slam is what is being addressed. There is skill in what Tito did. He skillfully used his head to KO Evans.What a pissy reply, are you saying there was no skill involved in this slam
Hey Superman. There's only 1 or 2 FRAMES between hitting the ground and the head. So maybe for the rest of us mortals, we can't see it as "obviously" that the guy was knocked out by the slam and not the head clash. If it wasn't for your unnaturally powerful reflexes and perception, we would think you're full of shit. Now, my baby fell out the window, can you go please catch it?He absolutely smashed his head off the mat...the head impact was secondary and not as hard as the floor impact... .
He also went limp almost immediately after hitting the floor which makes the elbows even worse
The head collision caused the knock out. It was pretty obvious.
Out before the rebounding heads clashed.
He was out from the slam the headbutt was mild and massively after the fact. He was out because his head smashed the canvas
Oh shit, the whole fucking justice league is hereI see it as well. The clash happened after he was slammed unconcious and was minimal. That was a poor decision.
But heads are much harder than cushioned mats.
I think he was contemplating the implications of the head clash instead of saving him from the needless elbows.
Defined cushioned mats lol.
Anyone whos wrestled or grappled knows theres like an inch of padding ..its not a whole lot and u can absolutely get rocked or K.Oed from takedowns...just falling wrong or missing a break fall and ur in trouble...
People downplaying the slam impact is strange to me...he was thrown onto his head with no brace for impact...with another persons momentum added onto it ...
Speaking from experience ( Japanese Jiu-Jitsu/Brazilian Jiu Jitsu training,MMA training and Muay thai Training) ...you can absolutely be koed like this
I haven't been on a folkstyle wrestling mat since the 90s, but back then, I think they were about two inches thick. I think I saw one being used in an AEW episode once when the top canvas got pulled off, and it looked about two inches. Not that the UFC would necessarily have the same mat.
Heres an octagon manufacturer ..
https://www.stedyx.com/en/product/19-octagon-ufc-rules/
Its 3 cms thick or 1.1 inches..this is regulation correct MMA ring ...
Imo, the correct call should have been KO Slam.
Video evidence doesn't clearly show when he went unconscious or if it was the slam or head to head contact.
If video evidence does not allow you to clearly make the call, the original "call" from the in octagon ref should stand.
I guess video refereeing has changed a lot of sports. In football (soccer) they have been extremely reluctant to use it until very recently. That's how Maradona's Hand of God could happen, and some people argued that having fallible refereeing was essential to the sport. Sometimes it was in your favor, sometimes not ; one of the problems being it was obviously easier to buy a ref.I saw a double play the other day that got called back because instant replay showed the shortstop missed 2nd base.
10 years ago that would have NEVER been called. Anywhere close to the base was fine. I can only assume it was instant replay that changed the rule.
Same thing here. Rampage/Arona was a head clash, but all us old timers still consider it a slam KO. Same with Couture v Gonzaga (IIRC). Tonight's was little to no different than those and many others.
So the slam didn't change; how we perceive the slam it what changed.
But, rules evolve all the time. So, shrug.
Frankly I'm more disturbed with the ref allowing all those elbows after he was clearly not defending anymore.
The biggest factor in the Tito/Tanner KO was that the was a hard spot on the canvas that several fighters had complained about prior to the event, Tito managed to drop Tanner directly on it. Couple that with Tito's head and Tanner was fucked.The Tito vs Evans slam is what is being addressed. There is skill in what Tito did. He skillfully used his head to KO Evans.