Tamper Tantrum (Mueller Thread v. 17)

Status
Not open for further replies.
You don't know what you're talking about. Do you understand that he violated the terms of his bail by committing a felony? That's not a "ploy".

Yes, I understand he violated his terms of bail. But what matters here isn't that he violated terms its what he did to violate terms. Nuance must be a mother fucker huh?
 
Your verbal illustrations here are very underrated good sir.



@Farmer Br0wn is a full troll. The guy actually suggested there was a moral/religious difference between cheating on your wife while in office, vs cheating on her while out of office. And we all know the only reason he'd intentionally make that distinction.

When I called him out to clarify and explain, he oddly didn't respond. He's about as legit as rip, bob and hatchetharry.
If you are Republican it’s not considered cheating but part of God’s plan.
 
Yes, I understand he violated his terms of bail. But what matters here isn't that he violated terms its what he did to violate terms. Nuance must be a mother fucker huh?

So what is this "ploy" you're babbling about? Do you understand that witness tampering is a serious charge?
 
So what is this "ploy" you're babbling about? Do you understand that witness tampering is a serious charge?

If convicted, yes. But it all depends on what they considered tampering. I haven't seen the alleged texts.
 
If convicted, yes. But it all depends on what they considered tampering. I haven't seen the alleged texts.

lol no, you motherfucking legal eagle, witness tampering is still a serious crime even if he's not convicted of the original charges. It's like lying to federal investigators: you're fucked, regardless of the legality of your other actions.
 
lol no, you motherfucking legal eagle, witness tampering is still a serious crime even if he's not convicted of the original charges. It's like lying to federal investigators: you're fucked, regardless of the legality of your other actions.

What I read, is that he and "Person-A" were contacting people about the Ukraine and getting money for the campaign and he allegedly told them to make sure they mentioned that it only happened in the Ukraine.That's it, I have no idea how the events happened. I don't think you do either. Which yes will matter when convicting him.
 
What I read, is that he and "Person-A" were contacting people about the Ukraine and getting money for the campaign and he allegedly told them to make sure they mentioned that it only happened in the Ukraine.That's it, I have no idea how the events happened. I don't think you do either. Which yes will matter when convicting him.

I'm glad your understanding of this "ploy" is so keen and focused.

The events that got him arrested have no bearing on the penalties for him lying to investigators or tampering with witness, both of which he did. That means even if he's found guilty of all other crimes, he's still guilty of those two.
 
I'm glad your understanding of this "ploy" is so keen and focused.

The events that got him arrested have no bearing on the penalties for him lying to investigators or tampering with witness, both of which he did. That means even if he's found guilty of all other crimes, he's still guilty of those two.

*Allegedly
 
Lol at arguing Manafort's a victim of anything after he just got thrown in jail for trying to get witnesses to lie.

The cult is real folks.
 
It's gonna be interesting to see just how emboldened Trump's been by his blind and deaf followers.

He knows he can tell them anything, and just because it's from his mouth, they'll push it. But how willing will everyone around him be to try the same tactic knowing it won't work for all of them?

When this reaches a boiling point, we're gonna see where America's really at. Either we're mostly a nation of still fairly reasonable people, or we're officially a cult of personality that stands for nothing.
 
Is that the "ploy" you were slobbering about? he's being framed? jfc Trumptards gonna tard for Trump

You always assume things and go for sensationalized headlines. Don't know if he's being framed but this could be a means to try and extort information. It wouldn't be the first time we've done this.
 
You always assume things and go for sensationalized headlines. Don't know if he's being framed but this could be a means to try and extort information. It wouldn't be the first time we've done this.
Wow, just wow!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top