Tamper Tantrum (Mueller Thread v. 17)

Status
Not open for further replies.
bobgeese said:
I did post it, there’s an entire thread. There’s also so much evidence presented, it took multiple posts to fit it all. Again, all sourced from nyt, WP, wsj, and government documents.


When Meullers report comes out, I’ll be far too busy rubbing it in your faces I’ve been right since day 1, Trump will walk.
Click to expand...

There’s an entire thread of your circular arguement that leads no where. The sad part is you suckered SBJJ into believing you.
 
Ophydian said:
There’s an entire thread of your circular arguement that leads no where. The sad part is you suckered SBJJ into believing you.
Click to expand...


If by my arguments, you mean citing the WSJ, NYT, WP, and government documents...
 
bobgeese said:
If by my arguments, you mean citing the WSJ, NYT, WP, and government documents...
Click to expand...

This is cute and I see you’re working on your defense. Hey, it wasn’t me, I was just misinterrupting the articles I was using as reference so blame them not me. VERY Presidential of you, much Trump.
 
Ophydian said:
This is cute and I see you’re working on your defense. Hey, it wasn’t me, I was just misinterrupting the articles I was using as reference so blame them not me. VERY Presidential of you, much Trump.
Click to expand...


How am I misinterpreting them literally labeling him a “special agent”?
 
bobgeese said:
How am I misinterpreting them literally labeling him a “special agent”?
Click to expand...

Please explain how it is not the height of hypocrisy for you to constantly brush off reports by all of these news outlets when they uncover something bad about the man you support, but unquestionably believe them now that you think they agree with you.

If you cannot do this, you will confirm what seems obvious: You are a 100% partisan hack without any sort of character.
 
hillelslovak87 said:
Please explain how it is not the height of hypocrisy for you to constantly brush off reports by all of these news outlets when they uncover something bad about the man you support, but unquestionably believe them now that you think they agree with you.

If you cannot do this, you will confirm what seems obvious: You are a 100% partisan hack without any sort of character.
Click to expand...


Sure, that’s easy. The reports I’m referencing that detail the first time he was involved in spying on a presidential campaign are decades old now. That was before journalism turned into clickbait about trump feeding fish, getting two scoops, and leaving out 85% of his statement so that it looks like he called all immigrants animals, when it’s clear he was talking about ms13.
 
bobgeese said:
Sure, that’s easy. The reports I’m referencing that detail the first time he was involved in spying on a presidential campaign are decades old now. That was before journalism turned into clickbait about trump feeding fish, getting two scoops, and leaving out 85% of his statement so that it looks like he called all immigrants animals, when it’s clear he was talking about ms13.
Click to expand...

So, they were telling the truth, then and now? Do you see the variable here? If they are part of the fake news deep state, how could they be trusted now?

If details are what makes you trust the fake news media, then you migth want to look at all the details of Trump and his orbit pussy footing, meeting and straight up corresponding with mob and oligarch connected Russian nationals.

Also, for the umpteenth time, you don't seem to know what an informant is. You seem to not get why zero credible national security analyst on earth is giving any weight to Trump's spy claim.
 
hillelslovak87 said:
So, they were telling the truth, then and now? Do you see the variable here? If they are part of the fake news deep state, how could they be trusted now?

If details are what makes you trust the fake news media, then you migth want to look at all the details of Trump and his orbit pussy footing, meeting and straight up corresponding with mob and oligarch connected Russian nationals.

Also, for the umpteenth time, you don't seem to know what an informant is. You seem to not get why zero credible national security analyst on earth is giving any weight to Trump's spy claim.
Click to expand...


Feel free to visit the thread I started, read through the facts and the timeline, and attempt to dispute those facts.

You’ll forgive me if I don’t take the governments word at face value. You know, the government who told us Benghazi was caused by a video, that Bo bergdall served with honor and distinction, etc.
 
bobgeese said:
Feel free to visit the thread I started, read through the facts and the timeline, and attempt to dispute those facts.

You’ll forgive me if I don’t take the governments word at face value. You know, the government who told us Benghazi was caused by a video, that Bo bergdall served with honor and distinction, etc.
Click to expand...

You have senior Republican leadership throwing water on Trump's claim. Surely if any of this was in the least bit credible, the honorable Devin Nunes would at least issue a comment, no?

Is Donald Trump being a lying blowhard really such a stretch? You guys are twisting into some whore's pretzel trying to defend this stuff coherently.
 
hillelslovak87 said:
You have senior Republican leadership throwing water on Trump's claim. Surely if any of this was in the least bit credible, the honorable Devin Nunes would at least issue a comment, no?

Is Donald Trump being a lying blowhard really such a stretch? You guys are twisting into some whore's pretzel trying to defend this stuff coherently.
Click to expand...



Trump is a lying blowhard.

That has nothing to do with the facts.

Also, it’s convenient you’re forgetting the 12 sitting members of Congress who just put on a 45 minute press conference to again call for a second special council.


Also, there are legitimate concerns that Meuller is investigating. It’s amusing how any criticism from the right is automatically turned into “you want to shut down the investigation”.

Which is especially ironic considering, according to Meuller, trump is not the target of his investigation.
 
bobgeese said:
How am I misinterpreting them literally labeling him a “special agent”?
Click to expand...

Cling on to that one word I think it's helping your case. Maybe copy paste the definition of a spy. Honestly, all of those Republican who have seen the information pertaining to the Trump investigation are probably spouting fake news to keep the dummy Democrats in check.
 
lol rudy is such a fucking liar. Why would anyone believe anything he says?
 
The news report Chump is using his personal cell phone more to get around John Kelly, then cell phone spying/interception devices that trick cell phones into thinking they are just another cell phone tower are discovered around the White House. Played like a fiddle. 4D chess.
 
GSP_37 said:
The news report Chump is using his personal cell phone more to get around John Kelly, then cell phone spying/interception devices that trick cell phones into thinking they are just another cell phone tower are discovered around the White House. Played like a fiddle. 4D chess.
Click to expand...

Here’s the twist, Trump turns out to be the inside leaker by having unencrypted calls.

It wouldn’t surprise me if one of those cell phone towers was labeled MAGA.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,794
Messages
58,318,249
Members
175,998
Latest member
Rosabelot

Share this page

Back
Top