Post the entire text.

Yeah. And it's even less relevant.And remind us, did the IG also criticize Loretta, yes.
You're not going to get tired of something that rarely happens.I never get tired of winning.

"What is the point of saying that there was a spy in the campaign when there was none?" Rooney said in an interview on Wednesday. "You know what I’m saying? It’s like, ‘Lets create this thing to tweet about knowing that it’s not true.’ … Maybe it’s just to create more chaos but it doesn’t really help the case."
Another reminder just how dead spygate is
Another reminder just how dead spygate is
Could the rats finally be starting to jump off the ship?
You can keep saying that, does not make it so. All it does is out yourself as a dishonest troll or truly, profoundly stupid.Friendly reminder, there was a spy placed into the Trump campaign. His name is Stefan Halper and he has a history of spying on presidential campaigns. The nyt referred to him as a secret agent.
spy
spī/
noun
verb
- 1.
a person who secretly collects and reports information on the activities, movements, and plans of an enemy or competitor.
synonyms: secret agent, intelligence agent, double agent, undercover agent, counterspy, mole, sleeper, plant, scout; More
- 1.
work for a government or other organization by secretly collecting information about enemies or competitors.
"he agreed to spy for the West"
synonyms: be a spy, gather intelligence, work for the secret service; More
You can keep saying that, does not make it so. All it does is out yourself as a dishonest troll or truly, profoundly stupid.
So everybody who saw the classified briefing disagrees, but the great Bobgeese of karate forum fame knows better?Actually, it does make it so, because it’s a fact.
So everybody who saw the classified briefing disagrees, but the great Bobgeese of karate forum fame knows better?
The question of whether the FBI after improperly to use an informant is not among them. It was answered. The FBI did exactly what the American people would have wanted it to do with regards to gathering intel about Russian influence in the campaign.Did you intentionally leave out the part where Ryan states “but Congress still has questions”?
The question of whether the FBI after improperly to use an informant is not among them. It was answered. The FBI did exactly what the American people would have wanted it to do with regards to gathering intel about Russian influence in the campaign.
A solid third of the voters are unaware of the facts at hand due to propaganda constantly being bleated by goats like you.I’m pretty sure a solid third of the voters in the country disagree with you.
A solid third of the voters are unaware of the facts at hand due to propaganda constantly being bleated by goats like you.
You’ve shown you have zero concern with legitimate wrongdoing by repeating the roundly debunked Spygate nonsense over and over. Your only concern is trying to score “points” in some imaginary game and have zero concern with the truth.The right is concerned with legitimate wrongdoing by leadership in the fbi and doj under the obama administration, some of which is now confirmed by the IG, and people have already been demoted, forced to retire, or have been outright fired.
Trading political favors for personal enrichment, corruption, making unauthorized contact with foreign powers without legal authority, endless obstruction of justice, witness tampering, countless lies to the public and investigators, and so on.The left is concerned with ...
You’ve shown you have zero concern with legitimate wrongdoing by repeating the roundly debunked Spygate nonsense over and over. Your only concern is trying to score “points” in some imaginary game and have zero concern with the truth.
The FBI acted properly in examining the Trump campaign for illicit contacts with Russian agents through the use of an informant, as is normal in law enforcement investigations. - Trey Gowdy, Paul Ryan, and everyone who isn’t a bleating goat like you.
Your narrative shifts by the week. You never admit when you’ve been pushing empty propaganda and it falls apart. You just shift the goalposts, return to a talking point refrain, BUT HILLARY, BUT OBAMA, or when all else fails, try to sound pithy.
Spygate is dead. Your Nunes memo is long dead. The surveillance of Page and Manafort turned out to be entirely legitimate and necessary. Etc.
For someone concerned only with “legitimate” investigations, you show very little ire for being fed false narratives. It’s like you know they’re bullshit and don’t care because that’s not the point to you, trolling and propaganda is.
Trading political favors for personal enrichment, corruption, making unauthorized contact with foreign powers without legal authority, endless obstruction of justice, witness tampering, countless lies to the public and investigators, and so on.




You should ask Paul Ryan and Gowdy about the evidence that led to the use of an informant. Or just wait for Mueller’s report.Please cite the “illicit contact with Russians” that prompted the investigation.
Post your supposed timeline, with sources, for your dishonest theory of the case.You’re uninformed on both the timeline, and the alleged triggers for the spying on multiple members of the trump campaign.
You should ask Paul Ryan and Gowdy about the evidence that led to the use of an informant. Or just wait for Mueller’s report.
Post your supposed timeline, with sources, for your dishonest theory of the case.
A reminder: law enforcement using informants on suspicion of crimes is nothing unusual or illegal. Police forces all across the US use them every day to gather information to make a determination of whether further investigation is warranted.
Spygate is still as dead as every other BS propaganda piece you’ve pushed in the WR. Sorry.