Erm...you want to import people into our countries that treat women like animals...but you know that already. You can't claim to be knowledgable if you didn't know what most 13 year olds can understand. You "care" about the issue?. No you don't, you reek of a sad man who couldn't get laid if he tried, so for your "revenge", you cheer on the mass rape of women by sub human scum. You aint fooling anyone son
Try to read the thread. Your arguments have already been addressed.
That case is certainly ludicrous, to say the least.
But I do not consider that evidence of the extraordinary claim that "the police is deliberately avoiding collecting statistics". Your link shows that a specific council didn't, but that seems like a singular case of criminal negligence, rather than evidence of a systemic conspiracy.
Source? Also, why are you completely ignoring the practice of Taqiyya?
http://forums.sherdog.com/posts/118333701/
https://books.google.dk/books?id=BKw0nyfo3zgC&lpg=PP1&hl=da&pg=PA342#v=onepage&q&f=false
I do not see how the concept of "Taqiyya" have any relevance here. Seems like another very large stretch, to claim that such a niché concept inside Islam somehow dictates the behaviour of these second generation muslims.
But are they a net positive in reality? Yes, some studies suggest they provide a small economic benefit. But the cultural damage long-term could far outstrip that. Additionally, the only reason they provide any benefit at all is the ridiculously low birth rates. Yes, we need young workers. But we need replacement birth rates amongst our native populations, not import slave labour. Your first source is from 2015, missing out on the recent crisis which is what I referred to. The second stops in 2010, and neither make reference to religion.
Yes, in particular in reality.
Cultural damage long term? You're going to have to be more specific. I certainly don't feel that my culture is under attack.
Of course the recent refugees are going to add to the unemployment rate. By the very nature of them being refugees, that is to be expected. Taking in refugees is a humanitarian effort, not an economic one.
As for the crime statistics, the 2010 one is just the one explaining the crime rates in detail, you can look up the crime statistics in general to this day as well. The trend continues till this day, crime rates are dropping across the entire west and has been for decades, while immigration has gone up.
There is no reference to religion, since that is not regarded as a significant factor.
I would like immigration to be focused upon particular specialist skills we need. Even an IQ test would help. As far as low level labour, I want to boost our birthrates and move into automation instead of bringing in people who will alter my country permanently from a cultural perspective. It seems rather rational to me.
That is a fairy tale land. Ethical concerns and human rights conventions aside, if you adjust immigration policies that way, you simply won't get any immigrants.
When I talk about rationality, I refer to economic rationality. Feelings and such is not part of it.
How are you going to "boost birthrates"? Like this?: