Sweden police hand out magic "do not molest me" bracelets

Are there any mainstream news sources for this?

When I google it, it looks like it's reported only on fringe sites with an agenda.
 
Need to be handing out I'll slit your ballsack pocket knives
 
Are there any mainstream news sources for this?

When I google it, it looks like it's reported only on fringe sites with an agenda.

Aww so innocent. You must be new here.
 
Aww so innocent. You must be new here.
But like I thought it wasnt a big deal??

I guess its a big enough deal for the cops to put out fuckin bracelets to remind people to report the crime.

but like, the muslims are peaceful and shit, and like bring great things to our society..

Its only a few incidents. Yea i'm sure the girls getting raped are fine in knowing that hey were part of the "few" that would of never had to go trough this if not for cucks like you and your government.

It's ok ladies, you take some rapes for the betterment of society>>>>
 
I think they should branch out with more bracelets:

Don't murder me
Don't blow me up
 
I think they should branch out with more bracelets:

Don't murder me
Don't blow me up
It's in line with the multicult worldview, though: It's all just a misunderstanding - the rapefugees don't know people don't want to be raped, stabbed or blown to bits. They've never thought about it, you see.
 

"The bracelets are just a small part of the police work against sexual offences, more about the other sections can be read in the boxes and in the links below. The bracelets are not designed to protect the wearer, but a way to get more young people to contemplate (their behaviour)".


So this is just part of a larger program from the swedish police, specific to this festival. Without spending too much time on it, I can see they have also put up video surveillance, increased the amount of security guards, declared that they will be more visibly present etc.
The bracelets are merely intended as symbolic initiatives, as part of an anti-sexual assault campaign.

So back to the WR classic: Acknowledging the issue of sexual assault, but refusing initiatives that is meant to put attention to the problem, because there is no racial/religious element to the initiative. Which again goes to show that you care more about the racial/religious aspect, than the women's right aspect (in which your concern is probably bordering zero).

Again the right winger on this forum find themselves in a paradox:
Making a case for sexual assault being a huge issue, while simultaneously having to oppose anti-sexual assault initiatives (and ridiculing feminists for claiming that sexual assault is a problem).

This only becomes a paradox, because you guys refuse to addres the elephant in the room. Which is that you deep down just want anti-immigration/discriminatory policies aimed at non-whites/muslims, and any occurence in society (no matter the statistical reality) that you can spin into a support of such policies, you will cling on to.
The problem is that we have seen so many of you be vigorously opposed to any feminist or other women's rights policies in the past, that this apparent concern for women's rights we suddenly see from you falls very flat.

Remember back when we discussed college girls getting assaulted at parties, and the overwhelming consensus from the right wing group on this forum was "They could just stay away from drunk horny men, that is expected to happen". Or you can just look at the usual mainstream right wing conservative answer to this problem (a problem that have existed since the dawn of man) -> "just dress modestly and don't act promiscuous".
But now suddenly there is a huge support for making policies, that addres a specific demographic of men. Even though there is little to no statistical evidence, of them being any worse than any other drunk young males.
 
Don't stone me if I get raped

Don't cut out my clit

Pleas let me drive

Please let me go to school

Please let me not have to wear all these hot ass clothes
 
But like I thought it wasnt a big deal??

I guess its a big enough deal for the cops to put out fuckin bracelets to remind people to report the crime.

but like, the muslims are peaceful and shit, and like bring great things to our society..

Its only a few incidents. Yea i'm sure the girls getting raped are fine in knowing that hey were part of the "few" that would of never had to go trough this if not for cucks like you and your government.

It's ok ladies, you take some rapes for the betterment of society>>>>

It has always been a big deal.
Feminist groups having tried to put light on this issue for decades. It's only after that certain unwanted demographics, also took part in the fun, that the right wing male suddenly also saw this as a huge issue (as it concerned the unwanted demographic).
 
"The bracelets are just a small part of the police work against sexual offences, more about the other sections can be read in the boxes and in the links below. The bracelets are not designed to protect the wearer, but a way to get more young people to contemplate (their behaviour)".

So this is just part of a larger program from the swedish police, specific to this festival. Without spending too much time on it, I can see they have also put up video surveillance, increased the amount of security guards, declared that they will be more visibly present etc.
The bracelets are merely intended as symbolic initiatives, as part of an anti-sexual assault campaign.

So back to the WR classic: Acknowledging the issue of sexual assault, but refusing initiatives that is meant to put attention to the problem, because there is no racial/religious element to the initiative. Which again goes to show that you care more about the racial/religious aspect, than the women's right aspect (in which your concern is probably bordering zero).

Again the right winger on this forum find themselves in a paradox:
Making a case for sexual assault being a huge issue, while simultaneously having to oppose anti-sexual assault initiatives (and ridiculing feminists for claiming that sexual assault is a problem).

This only becomes a paradox, because you guys refuse to addres the elephant in the room. Which is that you deep down just want anti-immigration/discriminatory policies aimed at non-whites/muslims, and any occurence in society (no matter the statistical reality) that you can spin into a support of such policies, you will cling on to.
The problem is that we have seen so many of you be vigorously opposed to any feminist or other women's rights policies in the past, that this apparent concern for women's rights we suddenly see from you falls very flat.

Remember back when we discussed college girls getting assaulted at parties, and the overwhelming consensus from the right wing group on this forum was "They could just stay away from drunk horny men, that is expected to happen". Or you can just look at the usual mainstream right wing conservative answer to this problem (a problem that have existed since the dawn of man) -> "just dress modestly and don't act promiscuous".
But now suddenly there is a huge support for making policies, that addres a specific demographic of men. Even though there is little to no statistical evidence, of them being any worse than any other drunk young males.
But you always talk about how they are not a big deal. But then you list eveything from bracelets to increased police presence, to more video cameras, etc?

If they are so peaceful and the crimes arent a big deal, then why is so much extra shit being done to be on the lookout for the crimes that supposeldy don't happen or happen in really low rates?
 
It has always been a big deal.
Feminist groups having tried to put light on this issue for decades. It's only after that certain unwanted demographics, also took part in the fun, that the right wing male suddenly also saw this as a huge issue (as it concerned the unwanted demographic).
If its always been a big deal, then why do you always downplay the issue and defend them?
 
"The bracelets are just a small part of the police work against sexual offences, more about the other sections can be read in the boxes and in the links below. The bracelets are not designed to protect the wearer, but a way to get more young people to contemplate (their behaviour)".

So this is just part of a larger program from the swedish police, specific to this festival. Without spending too much time on it, I can see they have also put up video surveillance, increased the amount of security guards, declared that they will be more visibly present etc.
The bracelets are merely intended as symbolic initiatives, as part of an anti-sexual assault campaign.

So back to the WR classic: Acknowledging the issue of sexual assault, but refusing initiatives that is meant to put attention to the problem, because there is no racial/religious element to the initiative. Which again goes to show that you care more about the racial/religious aspect, than the women's right aspect (in which your concern is probably bordering zero).

Again the right winger on this forum find themselves in a paradox:
Making a case for sexual assault being a huge issue, while simultaneously having to oppose anti-sexual assault initiatives (and ridiculing feminists for claiming that sexual assault is a problem).

This only becomes a paradox, because you guys refuse to addres the elephant in the room. Which is that you deep down just want anti-immigration/discriminatory policies aimed at non-whites/muslims, and any occurence in society (no matter the statistical reality) that you can spin into a support of such policies, you will cling on to.
The problem is that we have seen so many of you be vigorously opposed to any feminist or other women's rights policies in the past, that this apparent concern for women's rights we suddenly see from you falls very flat.

Remember back when we discussed college girls getting assaulted at parties, and the overwhelming consensus from the right wing group on this forum was "They could just stay away from drunk horny men, that is expected to happen". Or you can just look at the usual mainstream right wing conservative answer to this problem (a problem that have existed since the dawn of man) -> "just dress modestly and don't act promiscuous".
But now suddenly there is a huge support for making policies, that addres a specific demographic of men. Even though there is little to no statistical evidence, of them being any worse than any other drunk young males.

Or... peeps just having a joke about it. It is kinda silly even if it is to raise awareness.

I mean. Awareness bracelets are so 2008.
 
these bracelets are in swedish, pretty useless considering they target illiterate foreigner.
 
Or... peeps just having a joke about it. It is kinda silly even if it is to raise awareness.

I mean. Awareness bracelets are so 2008.
Here we all are in 2016 reading and/or talking about it though...
 
If its always been a big deal, then why do you always downplay the issue and defend them?
He's defending the issue while explaining that rape isn't the refugee's raison d'être as populistic leanings would have one here believe; saying, that the mistreatment of women is now a point of convenience for those with an agenda to make.
 
Jeeze rape use to be such a bad thing until the muzzies came along.
Today people are so numb and out of touch, they hear rape and it nothing.

When I was growing up if People heard rape, the community would physically something.

These people won't stop until people do something
 
Back
Top