Law Supreme Court ruling on voter rights could destroy Democrats

HereticBD said:
At one point, racial districts made sense. Today it doesn't. It only makes sense to Liberals who still want to pretend that modern times are no different than the 1800's, or the Jim Crow South.

Basically, Liberals are whining about their race hustle being broken up. They overreached in Louisiana and caused this case.
Click to expand...

And yet a group of people in Louisiana is very, very upset that 2 of 6 representatives are black.

4 of 6 is not enough of a majority for them.
 
Sinister said:
And yet a group of people in Louisiana is very, very upset that 2 of 6 representatives are black.

4 of 6 is not enough of a majority for them.
Click to expand...
Yeah, yeah, yeah...

Do you believe in democracy, or not?
 
Sinister said:
Gerrymandering should be illegal, do you agree or not?
Click to expand...
Sure. Shame both sides abuse the absolute fuck out of it. Be interesting to see what the country would look like without it. Is what it is.
 
Another instance of not being racist being racist.
 
HereticBD said:
Sure. Shame both sides abuse the absolute fuck out of it. Be interesting to see what the country would look like without it. Is what it is.
Click to expand...

One side egregiously abuses it far more than the other, and it's the side that invariably votes against making it illegal, and never puts forth legislation to make it illegal..
 
Sinister said:
One side egregiously abuses it far more than the other
Click to expand...
Oh', but of course, LOL. That's why if in a war of redistricting maps, the Democrats have FAR more to lose due to their rampant gerrymandering, that has certain districts with ZERO representation from the opposition, despite having 30-40% of people who don't vote for Democrats.
Sinister said:
and it's the side that invariably votes against making it illegal, and never puts forth legislation to make it illegal..
Click to expand...
If you believe that one side wants to get rid of it, you're dumb. It's one of those issues that one side will virtue signal over when it's convenient, but never actually do anything about it.
 
Can't wait to vote Nov 4th! Get these Judges out of here!
Clowns like @Sinister Can laugh, but PA is a swing state, and last time i checked, PA swung in Trumps favor. And we are going to swing in favor of getting these Woke Supreme Court Justices out of office.

20251016-210632.jpg
 
Last edited:
White Whale said:

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson says minorities are disabled people.
Click to expand...


Lol, you're trying to frame that as if you didnt clearly hear her say that she is talking about access to political engagement?

She's absolutely correct. They are not enabled. What's the opposite of enabled? During the 2000 election in the Florida panhandle rural towns with majority black residents had ZERO polling stations. They were made to drive to neighboring towns on a time limit, because those towns would NEVER vote to keep the polls open later.

Whenever Republicans want ballot drop boxes and polling locations removed and closed, it's curiously almost always black districts at the top of the list. Hard data backs up her assertion.
 
Being black is a disability, so at least the democrats have that going for them. At least as per Justice KBJ
 
HereticBD said:
Oh', but of course, LOL. That's why if in a war of redistricting maps, the Democrats have FAR more to lose due to their rampant gerrymandering, that has certain districts with ZERO representation from the opposition, despite having 30-40% of people who don't vote for Democrats.

If you believe that one side wants to get rid of it, you're dumb. It's one of those issues that one side will virtue signal over when it's convenient, but never actually do anything about it.
Click to expand...

How gerrymandered States is not reflected by a notion of someone having "more to lose." That's not even measurable considering Republicans fight every measure of making gerrymandering illegal tooth and nail.

You can call me dumb all you want. What you cannot do is refute people's voting records.
 
Last edited:
Sinister said:
How gerrymandered States is not reflected by a notion of someone having "more to lose."
Click to expand...
Oh', of course not.
Sinister said:
That's not even measurable
Click to expand...
Oh', of course not.
Sinister said:
You can call me dumb all you want. What you cannot do is refute people's voting records.
Click to expand...
I can not care about them, and can call you dumb for thinking that Democrats would actually eliminate it if they could. It's all part of the game. You know it.
 
Sinister said:
How gerrymandered States is not reflected by a notion of someone having "more to lose." That's not even measurable considering Republicans right every measure of making gerrymandering illegal tooth and nail.

You can call me dumb all you want. What you cannot do is refute people's voting records.
Click to expand...

Remember when Massachusetts governor a few months ago said they were going to fight Texas gerrymandering by gerrymandering if their own, but it turned out they already did in their state and they cannot gerrymander it more?

Lmao. Cry harder
 
HereticBD said:
Sure. Shame both sides abuse the absolute fuck out of it. Be interesting to see what the country would look like without it. Is what it is.
Click to expand...
Imagine if we got rid of gerrymandering, enacted political finance reform in a meaningful way, and made it possible to safely vote online.

Talk about interesting
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Hog-train
Law Questions on the Supreme Court Taking on Birthright Citizenship
19 20 21
Replies
411
Views
4K
Hog-train
Hog-train

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,530
Messages
58,293,921
Members
175,997
Latest member
WingedC

Share this page

Back
Top