• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Summery in March (SCO v 31)

Your tin foil hat.
8a8.gif
 
why was the cia hacking state elections making it look like china and russia was doing the hacking
 
The cacophony of stupid ITT is stupefying.

Fucking harpies, you never met a dishonest argument you didn't like. It's a sickness.

Why is it so easy for you to forget that there's a difference between having probable cause to initiate an investigation and the outcome of that investigation? Why is it so easy for you forget nuance and subtlety in every aspect of this discussion? Why is it so easy for you to forget the investigation was into the campaign, not only Trump himself. Why is it OK that he employed a bunch of crooks just because one accusation turned out to be wrong?

Let's see the report. And then, as many sane people ITT said from the beginning, if the Trump campaign did nothing wrong, ditto President Trump, great, good news. But everyone knows you are just blowing hot air if you want to keep saying it was wrong to initiate the investigation. The Russians made numerous attempts to create conduits to the Trump campaign. Trump made numerous public and private comments that strongly implied overt cooperation.

He's still a dirtbag and leader of the most corrupt administration in the country's history. Your celebrations are anarchic.
 
<TrumpWrong1>


Flynn was in no way charged with conspiracy.

Once again, trying to pass your lies off here only makes the adults in the room think less of you.

Was he not having secret meetings with members of hostile governments while in the White House as the National Security Advisor?

Real question - Would you be ok with Obama's National Security advisor taking secret meetings with the Iranians pertaining to their nuclear program and the easing of sanctions, and then lied about it to our intelligence apparatus?
 
The cacophony of stupid ITT is stupefying.

Fucking harpies, you never met a dishonest argument you didn't like. It's a sickness.

Why is it so easy for you to forget that there's a difference between having probable cause to initiate an investigation and the outcome of that investigation? Why is it so easy for you forget nuance and subtlety in every aspect of this discussion? Why is it so easy for you to forget the investigation was into the campaign, not only Trump himself. Why is it OK that he employed a bunch of crooks just because one accusation turned out to be wrong?

Let's see the report. And then, as many sane people ITT said from the beginning, if the Trump campaign did nothing wrong, ditto President Trump, great, good news. But everyone knows you are just blowing hot air if you want to keep saying it was wrong to initiate the investigation. The Russians made numerous attempts to create conduits to the Trump campaign. Trump made numerous public and private comments that strongly implied overt cooperation.

He's still a dirtbag and leader of the most corrupt administration in the country's history. Your celebrations are anarchic.

It's funny how we're being told that it's the left who has a want for authoritarian action, while the people making the claim support any and all encroachments upon checks and balances by this president. Could you even imagine if Obama, another cult of personality, mused over taking people's guns without due process?
 
why was the cia hacking state elections making it look like china and russia was doing the hacking
Further, and more to your point, why is it that Operation Dumbo Drop is completely ignored by the MSM? Hacking elections and training elephants to do wild shit under the guise of a Disney film...

7pUx8d3.gif


8a8.gif
 
Was he not having secret meetings with members of hostile governments while in the White House as the National Security Advisor?

Real question - Would you be ok with Obama's National Security advisor taking secret meetings with the Iranians pertaining to their nuclear program and the easing of sanctions, and then lied about it to our intelligence apparatus?


Hill, please stick to reality.

Was he charged with conspiracy? No.

To your second point. John Kerry.
 
The cacophony of stupid ITT is stupefying.

Fucking harpies, you never met a dishonest argument you didn't like. It's a sickness.

Why is it so easy for you to forget that there's a difference between having probable cause to initiate an investigation and the outcome of that investigation? Why is it so easy for you forget nuance and subtlety in every aspect of this discussion? Why is it so easy for you to forget the investigation was into the campaign, not only Trump himself. Why is it OK that he employed a bunch of crooks just because one accusation turned out to be wrong?

Let's see the report. And then, as many sane people ITT said from the beginning, if the Trump campaign did nothing wrong, ditto President Trump, great, good news. But everyone knows you are just blowing hot air if you want to keep saying it was wrong to initiate the investigation. The Russians made numerous attempts to create conduits to the Trump campaign. Trump made numerous public and private comments that strongly implied overt cooperation.

He's still a dirtbag and leader of the most corrupt administration in the country's history. Your celebrations are anarchic.
This is very well said, but on the other hand, SJW cuck beta this is it, NPC TDS MAGA they have to go back, and lock her up Muslim 2020.

As you can see, this debate is multifaceted and subtle.
 
Was he not having secret meetings with members of hostile governments while in the White House as the National Security Advisor?

Real question - Would you be ok with Obama's National Security advisor taking secret meetings with the Iranians pertaining to their nuclear program and the easing of sanctions, and then lied about it to our intelligence apparatus?

Speaking via open phone lines with the Russian Ambassador is now having secret meetings


Lol
 
Was he not having secret meetings with members of hostile governments while in the White House as the National Security Advisor?

Real question - Would you be ok with Obama's National Security advisor taking secret meetings with the Iranians pertaining to their nuclear program and the easing of sanctions, and then lied about it to our intelligence apparatus?

What if Trump sent a plane load of secret cash to Putin. Could you imagine that
 
Speaking via open phone lines with the Russian Ambassador is now having secret meetings


Lol

He lied about secret meetings he did not disclose in his clearances.

What if Trump sent a plane load of secret cash to Putin. Could you imagine that

That money was owed to Iran, per an agreement. Agreements need to be kept. When assets are unfrozen, they are given back. Idiot.
 
The cacophony of stupid ITT is stupefying.

Fucking harpies, you never met a dishonest argument you didn't like. It's a sickness.

Why is it so easy for you to forget that there's a difference between having probable cause to initiate an investigation and the outcome of that investigation? Why is it so easy for you forget nuance and subtlety in every aspect of this discussion? Why is it so easy for you to forget the investigation was into the campaign, not only Trump himself. Why is it OK that he employed a bunch of crooks just because one accusation turned out to be wrong?

Let's see the report. And then, as many sane people ITT said from the beginning, if the Trump campaign did nothing wrong, ditto President Trump, great, good news. But everyone knows you are just blowing hot air if you want to keep saying it was wrong to initiate the investigation. The Russians made numerous attempts to create conduits to the Trump campaign. Trump made numerous public and private comments that strongly implied overt cooperation.

He's still a dirtbag and leader of the most corrupt administration in the country's history. Your celebrations are anarchic.


New Name today, Hunter?

Crazy Diamond, huh?

(you got the 'Crazy' part right...)
 
Back
Top