Summery in March (SCO v 31)

[BarryDillon]

The memo actually said it was written without regard to the DOJ's policy against indicting sitting Presidents. In other words, they could not have indicted Trump even if he were not President.

According to Barr. Not according to the memo, or necessarily the evidence, since we haven't seen either.

 

[JamesRussler]

According to Barr. Not according to the memo, or necessarily the evidence, since we haven't seen either.

I was referring to the 8-page memo that Barr wrote. Which one were you referring to?

 

[BarryDillon]

I was referring to the 8-page memo that Barr wrote. Which one were you referring to?

It's 4 pages, and it's a pile of dog shit.

 

[CrazyN8]

Did anyone actually expect posters to admit they have been wrong for the last 2 years? Admit that they lapped up the media propaganda?

No but its fun to watch them twist themselves into knots to try and maintain credibility.

 

[Witchhunt]

I agree, it really doesn't matter what anyone has for an opinion. Mueller's report, no matter what is in it, has been deemed by Barr to be no threat to Trump. We can agree or disagree, but it's a done deal.

Whether or not Mueller would speak out against Barr if he disagreed, though, is pure speculation.

Meuller has an ass to cover too. Beleive it. This entire shitshow is an obfuscation of what really goes on between big business, the media and government.
The internet free press is putting a ton of heat on these assholes and they’re pulling out all of the stops to deflect. They want us blind with lubed assholes. And many are.

 

[ocean size]

I agree, it really doesn't matter what anyone has for an opinion. Mueller's report, no matter what is in it, has been deemed by Barr to be no threat to Trump. We can agree or disagree, but it's a done deal.

Whether or not Mueller would speak out against Barr if he disagreed, though, is pure speculation.

I don't think anyone reasonably expects Mueller would say a word unless there was some absolute constitutional crisis type shit happening and even then he'd wait until Congress put him on the stand

 

[second sight]

The 4-page summary letter of the Mueller report already has been subject to copious punditry, but very little has been said about the law regarding obstruction of justice. Many will criticize the attorney general as being politically motivated for not proceeding on obstruction charges, but his letter tracked the Supreme Court’s limitations on obstruction of justice prosecutions.

In light of a long line of Supreme Court precedent that has limited various obstruction statutes, even reversing convictions, the decision has legal support. To successfully bring obstruction charges, a prosecutor would have to prove that a defendant did more than lie, get others to lie, or even destroy documents.

The special counsel “did not draw a conclusion — one way or the other — as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction.” While the report “does not conclude that the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.” Instead it left “any legal conclusions … to the Attorney General to determine whether the conduct described in the report constitutes a crime.”

Attorney General William Barr, along with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, then “concluded that the evidence developed … is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.” The reasons cited in the short letter include:

• “the President was [not] involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference”;
• he did not act “with corrupt intent”; and
• there was no “nexus” with the president’s conduct “to a pending or contemplated proceeding.”

https://thehill.com/opinion/crimina...enstein-likely-made-correct-legal-decision-on

 

[Farmer Br0wn]

As usual you are all misinterpreting the result for the sake of trolling. I'll wait for the report and the results of the other criminal investigations. You can crow all you want. Thinking it's great that your President, his campaign, and his administration, were all unwitting puppets of the Russians is a good thing, is as sad as electing that criminal POS in the first place, and I don't think it's necessarily better than Trump being a treasonous Putin bottom bitch.

The narrative that the investigation shouldn't have occurred because there was no fool proof case for conspiracy is as stupid as saying "no collusion" over and over again. I don't intend to argue about it. I don't have much else to say right now. As I said in the last thread, I'm just going to wait and see. You may search my post history to see I've always said, if he didn't do anything wrong, that's just great, but it doesn't mean the investigation shouldn't have taken place. There was "just cause" smoke all over the place, regardless of whether any fire was found.

At this point, it's perfectly safe to say that any insinuation that the President of the United States was in any way in collusion, or made a puppet of the Russian government, is extremist language.

 

[JamesRussler]

It's 4 pages, and it's a pile of dog shit.

Oh, you are correct, it's 4 pages, my mistake. He's the AG, and this is his second tour of duty in that capacity. Why wouldn't you trust him?

 

[ocean size]

Check out this guy's Robert Mueller tattoo!
What a genius

that dude better put RIP Grandpa underneath real quickly before he starts on removal sessions

 

[second sight]

LOLOLOLOLOLLLLL at you new AV, just realized that’s Homer.

You know he’s fucking seething over that hat.

what?

 

[Witchhunt]

lol

It has been a really strange thread because of that. Been sniped at a couple times myself, implying that I'm mad about the news or whatever, but that's not the case. I think the event has settled down enough that these threads could stand to be moderated for shitposting/memeposting and derails/callouts.

Yep, more gubment is needed.

 

[BarryDillon]

Oh, you are correct, it's 4 pages, my mistake. He's the AG, and this is his second tour of duty in that capacity. Why wouldn't you trust him?

His belief in the Unitary Executive.

Iran Contra.

The memo he wrote to audition for the job.

 

[glenwo2]

Holy.

fucking.

shit.

<Lmaoo><Lmaoo><Lmaoo><Lmaoo><Lmaoo><Lmaoo><Lmaoo><Lmaoo>

 

[grizzard2bid]

It's 4 pages, and it's a pile of dog shit.

"It hurts my feeling and reality" doesn't mean the report is a a "pile of dogshit". Mueller did not indict anyone for conspiracy. Seek help.

 

[waiguoren]

It's 4 pages, and it's a pile of dog shit.

A pile of dog shit? Do you think Mueller would sit idly by as Barr---his long-time friend---mischaracterized his investigation to the American public?

 

[BarryDillon]

"It hurts my feeling and reality" doesn't mean the report is a a "pile of dogshit". Seek help.

Sorry, "It's a pile of dog shit legally speaking.".

 

[BarryDillon]

A pile of dog shit? Do you think Mueller would sit idly by as Barr---his long-time friend---mischaracterized his investigation to the American public?

So far he has. I certainly hope he doesn't, but we'll see.

 

[JamesRussler]

His belief in the Unitary Executive.

Iran Contra.

The memo he wrote to audition for the job.

So what? Do you have any reason to believe his summary of Mueller's findings is inaccurate?

 

[grizzard2bid]

Sorry, "It's a pile of dog shit legally speaking.".

Who the fuck are you, legally speaking?