Summery in March (SCO v 31)

[BarryDillon]

And you know how it mischaracterizes the other report you haven’t seen.

Because of Barr's careful parsing of language, and his decision to not include a single complete sentence from the actual report.

Take a depth breath and try to actually process information dispassionately.

Thanks in advance!

 

[HereticBD]

Also, dude, bleeding vagina is not the preferred nomenclature. “Bleeding wherever,” please.

*Leaking front hole

 

[waiguoren]

Whether or not Mueller would speak out against Barr if he disagreed, though, is pure speculation.

Not really. Mueller spoke out just two months ago when Buzzfeed mischaracterized his investigation.


Mueller’s office disputes BuzzFeed News report that Trump told Cohen to lie to Congress

https://www.vox.com/2019/1/18/18187790/trump-mueller-buzzfeed-cohen-obstruction

 

[bobgeese]

I never called him a coward, but you already knew that.

You literally just told me,


“it's shaping up that way.”


Get some help man. Or don’t.

 

[Witchhunt]

Who? That's my dead friend, Ned.

<Lmaoo>

 

[waiguoren]

Because of Barr's careful parsing of language, and his decision to not include a single complete sentence from the actual report.

We don't know that Barr "carefuly parsed" Mueller's report, because we have not seen Mueller's report.

The fact that Barr's letter does not quote full sentences of the Mueller report does not mean that Barr mischaracterized the report.

 

[glenwo2]

Oh', that makes total sense. Kind of like how Mueller finding nothing on Trump, means that he actually found something on Trump...

You guys are fucking insane.

This is why I'm only going to talk to you guys and ignoring these clowns for the time being.

at the rate I was going earlier, I was ready to say something that would've gotten me in trouble.

So aggravating, these leftist dunderheads are.

 

[ocean size]

Because of Barr's careful parsing of language, and his decision to not include a single complete sentence from the actual report.

Mischaracterised is probably a stretch, but considering the language choices it isn't impossible that the report is misleading. This is a hackjob blog in general but makes a few interesting points on the subject. https://patribotics.blog/2019/03/25/william-barrs-wonderful-letter

 

[Bloody Pulp]

Take a depth breath and try to actually process information dispassionately.

Thanks in advance!

So you don’t know. Gotcha.

 

[BarryDillon]

You literally just told me,


“it's shaping up that way.”


Get some help man. Or don’t.

A pile of dog shit? Do you think Mueller would sit idly by as Barr---his long-time friend---mischaracterized his investigation to the American public?

So far he has. I certainly hope he doesn't, but we'll see.

 

[Bloody Pulp]

Not really. Mueller spoke out just two months ago when Buzzfeed mischaracterized his investigation.


Mueller’s office disputes BuzzFeed News report that Trump told Cohen to lie to Congress

https://www.vox.com/2019/1/18/18187790/trump-mueller-buzzfeed-cohen-obstruction

Oh don’t worry, I already showed him that. Doesn’t matter though cause that wasn’t Mueller himself, it was just his spokesperson speaking for him which means Mueller didn’t actually say it.

Yes that’s really his stance.

 

[bobgeese]

LOL, your definition of "trouncing" people, is reporting them for hurting your feelings, and getting banned for irritating the mods with your bleeding vagina and incessant whining.

LOLOLOLOLOLLLLL


But seriously, you forgot hotdog gifs.

 

[glenwo2]

That have nothing to do with Russian collusion nor obstruction of justice.
Nice shitpost.

These are not shitposts.

Just Plain old utter SHIT.

 

[computer fogie]

I'm pretty sure if Barr grossly mischaracterized Mueller's findings to the point of completely fabricating a conclusion that Mueller never came to, you'd have heard about it.

You're sure, but it's still a guess.

Now, just for one solid minute, I want you to think about just how desperate you are not to believe the official findings, and how far you're reaching to think some shady shit is going on...and then slap yourself.

I haven't said I don't believe the official findings, where did I say that? It's other people here who don't believe what Barr said about the report. I know it's hard for some of us to believe that Mueller found evidence that Trump obstructed justice (and that he didn't), but that's what Barr said, not me. My quoting of his words upsets people who want to believe something else.

I also haven't said there's anything shady going on. Where do you think I said this? You and a couple of other people have completely missed the points I'm making, and are trying to spin things so hard that you're saying Barr is a liar in effect.

 

[JamesRussler]

Because of Barr's careful parsing of language, and his decision to not include a single complete sentence from the actual report.

The letter did directly quote an independent clause from Mueller's report: "[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.” That's all there is to say.

 

[computer fogie]

Again, you’re either being very careless with your language, or you’re deliberately ignoring the fact that the decision was not made by Barr alone.

Look, it's Barr's office, it's his decision. His name is on the door. Nobody can make the decision for him, he can consult with whomever he wants but it's his to make. If you want to keep being deliberately obtuse, go ahead.

 

[HereticBD]

I haven't said I don't believe the official findings, where did I say that? It's other people here who don't believe what Barr said about the report. I know it's hard for some of us to believe that Mueller found evidence that Trump obstructed justice (and that he didn't), but that's what Barr said, not me. My quoting of his words upsets people who want to believe something else.

I also haven't said there's anything shady going on. Where do you think I said this? You and a couple of other people have completely missed the points I'm making, and are trying to spin things so hard that you're saying Barr is a liar in effect.

Yes or no. Do you accept the findings? Should be a very simple answer, not requiring a bunch of paragraphs explaining why you may or may not, sorta, kinda, non-committal garbage.

Yes or no. What say you?

 

[bobgeese]

These are not shitposts.

Just Plain old utter SHIT.

Democrats forgot how to shitpost.


I WILL TEACH THEM!

 

[BarryDillon]

The letter did directly quote an independent clause from Mueller's report: "[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.” That's all there is to say.

That [T] means they excluded the beginning of that sentence. They didn't bracket the T just for fun.

 

[bobgeese]

Look, it's Barr's office, it's his decision. His name is on the door. Nobody can make the decision for him, he can consult with whomever he wants but it's his to make. If you want to keep being deliberately obtuse, go ahead.

Like I said, if you don’t want to be shit on, stop using careless language. If RR disagreed, we’d know about it.