Summery in March (SCO v 31)

[CrazyN8]

Yes, Nate, anyone who doesn't blindly swallow Republican propaganda is a troll. It's not possible for people to think for themselves. Good job.

Oh, so you're just delusional then. Got it Jack.

 

[sickc0d3r]

You seem to be the usual retard posting. Any comment on that?

I like the truck in your av, so I forgive you for the lame insult.

 

[second sight]

if they found no evidence of collusion how can there be obstruction
how the fuck do you obstruct something that never took place

..".the evidence developed during the special counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the president committed an obstruction of justice offense."
"our determination was made without regard to, and is not based on the constitutional considerations that surround the indictment and criminal prosecution of a sitting president."
"generally speaking, to obtain and sustain an obstruction conviction, the government would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a person, acting with corrupt intent, engaged in obstructive conduct with a sufficient nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding."

1. Barr concludes that no charges of obstruction are warranted under DOJ rules because there was no underlying crime to obstruct

@computer fogie

 

[sickc0d3r]

But also, seriously, many of *them* are straight up losing it at their narrative being questioned.

I've noticed a lot of insults, CAPITALIZATION, and BOLD posting from the supposed calm folks.

 

[sickc0d3r]

Wait, what? Have you read this thread? @MikeMcMann has been having a historic meltdown for starters.

Looks like he's discussing the topic to me. Can you post an example? I love a good meltdown, I do.

 

[Jack V Savage]

Oh, so you're just delusional then. Got it Jack.

More childish namecalling is a good way to convince me that you're not melting down and that you really believe the GOP narrative here.

 

[unimackpass]

It's truly remarkable to see the constant freakouts from right-wingers here while they're desperately trying to insist that it's some kind of victory.

Here's a tweet from the right wing troll
Pierce Morgan

Very interesting to see which of the vast array of notable Trump-haters on here have the good grace to acknowledge he's been cleared of any Russia collusion. If they don't, after 2yrs of saying he's guilty, then their Trump Derangement Syndrome is so advanced it's incurable.
8:58 AM · Mar 25, 2019 · TweetDeck
172
Retweets
1.2K
Likes







Nutty Noah

@andii29
·
2h

Replying to
@piersmorgan

 

[BarryDillon]

I've noticed a lot of insults, CAPITALIZATION, and BOLD posting from the supposed calm folks.

AGREED

 

[Bloody Pulp]

This is one of the most brutal rants I've seen in a long time.
The guy with the fat face on the right looks like he's trying not to cry.
Greenwell is no friend of trump but sees clearly what's happening.
Its a clip from Democracy Now so libs don't have to be nervous.

"It's over!.... they just handed trump the biggest gift he could have hoped for!" ( some people want that gift to expand )

The human inspiration for Milhouse.

 

[Witchhunt]

He does get paid plentifully to talk shit about Trump so I'm not sure he's that sad.

Imagine how all the sherdoggies feel that aren’t getting paid.

 

[unimackpass]

PIERS MORGAN: The Russia collusion hoax was a disgraceful fake news witch-hunt that shames all of Trump’s deranged enemies in the media, the FBI and Hollywood and has probably ensured their worst nightmare - his re-election


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...-report-shows-collusion-disgraceful-hoax.html

After an intensive investigation, Mueller concluded that neither the President nor any of his campaign team conspired with any Russians to interfere with the election.

Trump is jubilant, understandably.

But whilst I am pleased for him that he was finally exonerated of a high crime I never thought he could possibly have committed, my overwhelming feeling today is one of fury that he had to endure such a disgraceful, deceitful and concerted attack on his presidency based on nothing but a fervent desire to destroy him and his family.

Make no mistake, this was a ‘Get Trump’ mission driven by a collection of people who just couldn’t stomach the thought that he won the White House.

The Democrats, led by the demented Adam Schiff, screamed ‘COLLUSION!’ so often I’m amazed their larynxes didn’t explode.

But at least they had an obvious political motive for wanting Trump gone.

 

[CrazyN8]

More childish namecalling is a good way to convince me that you're not melting down and that you really believe the GOP narrative here.

That wasn't an insult, it was a diagnosis, you're welcome.

 

[ocean size]

It absolutely did, because he left the decision up to Barr and RR.

He presented facts for and against (apparently), it was determined they were insufficient.

It's difficult to mesh these two things:

"[Mueller setting out] evidence on both sides of the question and leaves unresolved what the special counsel views as ‘difficult issues’ of law and fact concerning whether the president’s actions and intent could be viewed as obstruction.”

"[Mueller's report] absolutely did [exonerate Trump]".

A reasonable interpretation of the former is while there is evidence consistent with obstruction, Mueller noted difficult issues of law might include things like when exercise of executive power overlaps with what could be evidence of corrupt intent. Not sure what the difficult issues of fact would be, but I'd be curious to see them. However it's seems odd to parse that as an absolute exoneration when he is fully capable of writing much less equivocally, like when he addresses collusion.

 

[unimackpass]

PIERS MORGAN: The Russia collusion hoax was a disgraceful fake news witch-hunt that shames all of Trump’s deranged enemies in the media, the FBI and Hollywood and has probably ensured their worst nightmare - his re-election


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...-report-shows-collusion-disgraceful-hoax.html

"After an intensive investigation, Mueller concluded that neither the President nor any of his campaign team conspired with any Russians to interfere with the election.

Trump is jubilant, understandably.

But whilst I am pleased for him that he was finally exonerated of a high crime I never thought he could possibly have committed, my overwhelming feeling today is one of fury that he had to endure such a disgraceful, deceitful and concerted attack on his presidency based on nothing but a fervent desire to destroy him and his family.

Make no mistake, this was a ‘Get Trump’ mission driven by a collection of people who just couldn’t stomach the thought that he won the White House.

The Democrats, led by the demented Adam Schiff, screamed ‘COLLUSION!’ so often I’m amazed their larynxes didn’t explode.

But at least they had an obvious political motive for wanting Trump gone.

"
What is far worse is the way so many mainstream US media networks, newspapers and individual journalists fuelled the fake frenzy.

They let all the normal rules of balanced reporting fly out the window as they competed with each other over who could land the biggest Pulitzer prize-winning Trump/Russia sucker punch that would KO the President they loathe.

Only it turned out they were all punching thin air.

There was no collusion.

None.

Nada.

And today, all the people who’ve spent the past two years telling the world ‘Trump’s going down for Russia collusion’ look very stupid and have their reputations for impartiality irrevocably ruined.

Once revered newspapers like The New York Times and Washington Post are effectively finished as credible purveyors of fair and balanced news.

Their sustained, often viciously partisan Russiagate coverage has been dictated not by any ‘higher purpose’ journalistic rigour but by commercial greed: the more they hammer the President, the more copies they sell and website clicks they attract, and the more money they make.

And the ‘Trump’s a traitor’ narrative has been their biggest money-spinner.

The Times has seen subscriptions and profits skyrocket since it erupted and has boasted about its success ad nauseam - but at what cost to its integrity?"

 

[Witchhunt]

No, you're arguing for the President to be above the law. You're a disgusting hack, and beneath my contempt.

Really Homer? You argued with that?
Even the premis of investigating a person, rather than a crime, is against our entire system. It benefits the rich and the poor, the powerful and most meek among us. It’s the entire purpose behind this country’s foundation.
I’ve had some fun gouging with you back and forth in the past, but damn man, wake up.

 

[computer fogie]

You see, this is the argument of a child.

“Trump wasn’t exonerated by Meullers report”

That’s because Meuller decided not to make a decision. His decision was to leave the decision up to his boss.

Your point is wholly meaningless. You keep using this talking point, but it means nothing. That’s what a child does, repeat the same meaningless, mindless thing over and over.

The adults are trying to tell you that Meuller did make a decision. To pass the decision onto his boss.

Perhaps you should listen to the folks who’ve been right since day 1.

100% troll post.

 

[BarryDillon]

Really Homer? You argued with that?
Even the premis of investigating a person, rather than a crime, is against our entire system. It benefits the rich and the poor, the powerful and most meek among us. It’s the entire purpose behind this country’s foundation.
I’ve had some fun gouging with you back and forth in the past, but damn man, wake up.

People are investigated for possibly committing crimes.

 

[bobgeese]

Now you don't think Mueller's report is a big deal. Say WHAT?!?

Tell me what I've said here that is even an opinion of mine, much less an avoidance of the truth. I'm trying to tell some of you the truth, in the form of what Barr has said. I say Trump wasn't exonerated by Mueller's report, you guys say he was. I reply that Barr himself said that about Mueller's report, you guys dodge that fact.

What is it that you're so defensive about? It has to be that Barr said there is evidence in the report of Trump committing obstruction. Now before you go off the rails again, tell me why you don't believe Barr about what is in the report. At least try.

Btw, this is your typical post in response to me.


“Is the investigation over, or is it closing in on Trump?”
https://forums.sherdog.com/threads/...on-thread-v-22.3820567/page-15#post-144359927






So by all means, keep posting your literal meaningless point. It only serves to embarrass yourself further.

 

[HereticBD]

People are investigated for possibly committing crimes.

Yep, and people get exonerated by the investigation, if they are found not to have committed a crime.

 

[Ornife]

Btw, this is your typical post in response to me.


“Is the investigation over, or is it closing in on Trump?”






So by all means, keep posting your literal meaningless point. It only serves to embarrass yourself further.

Meaningless point or insightful and nuanced position?