Summery in March (SCO v 31)

McConnell is taking concrete action to try to prevent the public from knowing what's in there. If Trump fights him on that, I'll believe that Trump wants people to know. And "Mueller finding nothing on Trump" is a claim you're making with no basis at all. There have already been multiple indictments and guilty pleas here.
Guilty pleas of people, but no collusion by Trump. Those are the facts.
 
McConnell is taking concrete action to try to prevent the public from knowing what's in there. If Trump fights him on that, I'll believe that Trump wants people to know. And "Mueller finding nothing on Trump" is a claim you're making with no basis at all. There have already been multiple indictments and guilty pleas here.

Stop it, Jack. You're not good at the whole blissful ignorance trolling thing. There have been no indictments related to Trump, or his campaign colluding with Russia, and the Mueller investigation found nothing of significance regarding it.

You know this, but you're just being a pitiful reality denying hack.
 
McConnell is taking concrete action to try to prevent the public from knowing what's in there. If Trump fights him on that, I'll believe that Trump wants people to know. And "Mueller finding nothing on Trump" is a claim you're making with no basis at all. There have already been multiple indictments and guilty pleas here.

That have nothing to do with Russian collusion nor obstruction of justice.
Nice shitpost.
 
if they found no evidence of collusion how can there be obstruction
how the fuck do you obstruct something that never took place
 
You don't think that it's an example of dishonest argumentation and rank tribalism to actually post comments from anonymous randos as if it makes any kind of larger point?
I never claimed it made a larger point. That's your paranoia talking. I posted it because it's entertaining.
 
Stop it, Jack. You're not good at the whole blissful ignorance trolling thing. There have been no indictments related to Trump, or his campaign colluding with Russia, and the Mueller investigation found nothing of significance regarding it.

You know this, but you're just being a pitiful reality denying hack.

He's just terrible at trolling. He really is a nice guy, though a brainwashed partisan.
 
And it's interesting how Republican partisans are both angrily melting down AND trying to claim victory. That's another thing that seems fishy (in that one gets the sense these guys don't believe what they're saying).

Jack I think you're legit losing it, maybe you need to take some safe space days away from the interwebs. Your brain is short circuiting working so hard to spin this. Hillary lost. Trump did not collude with the ruskies you were wrong now deal with it like an adult.
 
What I noted smells fishy is the way a poster professes to believe that the report looks good for Trump and to not be curious about why McConnell would suppress it.

But McConnell objected, noting that Attorney General William Barr is working with Mueller to determine what in his report can be released publicly and what cannot.

"The special counsel and the Justice Department ought to be allowed to finish their work in a professional manner," McConnell said. "To date, the attorney general has followed through on his commitments to Congress. One of those commitments is that he intends to release as much information as possible."


https://thehill.com/homenews/senate...ion-calling-for-mueller-report-to-be-released
 
Liberals who are whining that report is taking too long to fully release are intentionally overlooking the very obvious reality that's now undeniable, that this whole "RUSSIA CONFUSION" was just a fishing expedition by Obama's DOJ. Time to kill it and turn the heat on those who started it.
 

Here is a meme for you.
1b90OkR3niwBVzTDQBnss9g.jpeg
 
And it's interesting how Republican partisans are both angrily melting down AND trying to claim victory. That's another thing that seems fishy (in that one gets the sense these guys don't believe what they're saying).
This thread has been hilarious. Buncha Trump fans hoping people will "melt down", not getting anything like that from the normal people, and then pretending it happened anyway. Must be a weekday in the War Room.
 
This thread has been hilarious. Buncha Trump fans hoping people will "melt down", not getting anything like that from the normal people, and then pretending it happened anyway. Must be a weekday in the War Room.

Well, most are dodging or not posting since yesterday. And few are going full retard and trolling to save face.

I'm entertained.
 
This thread has been hilarious. Buncha Trump fans hoping people will "melt down", not getting anything like that from the normal people, and then pretending it happened anyway. Must be a weekday in the War Room.
You seem to be the usual retard posting. Any comment on that?
 
Stop it, Jack. You're not good at the whole blissful ignorance trolling thing. There have been no indictments related to Trump, or his campaign colluding with Russia, and the Mueller investigation found nothing of significance regarding it.

You know this, but you're just being a pitiful reality denying hack.

He actually believes in his own hi IQ trope and it's devastating that a farmer that watches fox news has been right the whole time and has been trying to explain to him for two years he was believing in conspiracies.
Your talking about a paradigm shift of immense proportions,
this will probably take some time.
 
Jack I think you're legit losing it, maybe you need to take some safe space days away from the interwebs. Your brain is short circuiting working so hard to spin this. Hillary lost. Trump did not collude with the ruskies you were wrong now deal with it like an adult.

:) It's truly remarkable to see the constant freakouts from right-wingers here while they're desperately trying to insist that it's some kind of victory.
 
This thread has been hilarious. Buncha Trump fans hoping people will "melt down", not getting anything like that from the normal people, and then pretending it happened anyway. Must be a weekday in the War Room.

But also, seriously, many of *them* are straight up losing it at their narrative being questioned.
 
Written by a liberal

It's official: Russiagate is this generation's WMD

The Iraq war faceplant damaged the reputation of the press. Russiagate just destroyed it

https://taibbi.substack.com/p/russiagate-is-wmd-times-a-million

For those anxious to keep the dream alive, the Times published its usual graphic of Trump-Russia “contacts,” inviting readers to keep making connections. But in a separate piece by Peter Baker, the paper noted the Mueller news had dire consequences for the press:

It will be a reckoning for President Trump, to be sure, but also for Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel, for Congress, for Democrats, for Republicans, for the news media and, yes, for the system as a whole…

This is a damning page one admission by the Times. Despite the connect-the-dots graphic in its other story, and despite the astonishing, emotion-laden editorial the paper also ran suggesting “We don’t need to read the Mueller report” because we know Trump is guilty, Baker at least began the work of preparing Times readers for a hard question: “Have journalists connected too many dots that do not really add up?”

The paper was signaling it understood there would now be questions about whether or not news outlets like itself made galactic errors by betting heavily on a new, politicized approach, trying to be true to “history’s judgment” on top of the hard-enough job of just being true. Worse, in a brutal irony everyone should have seen coming, the press has now handed Trump the mother of campaign issues heading into 2020.

Nothing Trump is accused of from now on by the press will be believed by huge chunks of the population, a group that (perhaps thanks to this story) is now larger than his original base. As Baker notes, a full 50.3% of respondents in a poll conducted this month said they agree with Trump the Mueller probe is a “witch hunt.”
 
But McConnell objected, noting that Attorney General William Barr is working with Mueller to determine what in his report can be released publicly and what cannot.

That's a strange place to start quoting. :)
 
Back
Top