Streamer gets elbowed by former UFC fighter

[ssBaldy]

This retard got his shit rocked twice in 24hs lmao. The Larry Wheels clip was gold. Deserved it both times too.

Larry Wheels seems to be a very chill dude. This asshole streamer must have done his best to provike him.

 

[Syd1975]

First of all, no, it's not. That's not what the word "support" means. Just because you don't support one person in a confrontation doesn't entail that you support his antagonist. Second, "victim"? Really? Victim of what? Some idiot running his mouth? Someone saying hostile things makes a person a victim to you?

Are you Gen Z? Did you parents not teach you the "sticks and stones" lesson?

I'm unclear of this moderator flex at this point.

What do you want from me? What would you have me say?

Are you notifying me of a violation of forum rules?

Please let me know if I've done so.

If I haven't, please go pick an argument with someone else.

 

[Phlog]

Camera out, this is pro wrestling.

 

[Madmick]

I'm unclear of this moderator flex at this point.

What do you want from me? What would you have me say?

Are you notifying me of a violation of forum rules?

Please let me know if I've done so.

If I haven't, please go pick an argument with someone else.

At no point have I mentioned anything about you violating forum rules or threatened you with moderation. This bizarre reaction to what I just wrote gets to the heart of why I'm addressing you in the first place. You appear to wildly misread what people say to interpret all sort of loaded intents that simply aren't there.

Look again. The below were the only comments in this thread posted before you wrote your opinion the streamer "has some fans" that did anything other than rejoice in the streamer getting his just desserts.

Second degree assault, I'd say. Deserved or not, dumb move by the mma fighter.

What did @revoltub say that was wrong? He simply observes this likely constitutes a criminal offense. His comment "deserved or not" suggests that like everyone else he believes it was deserved. But that's not why he's calling it a dumb move.

Both come across as arseholes.

50 years old and still getting into fights because he felt disrespected or some shit, is pathetic. Clear cheap shot too.

Fucking Rampage clearly a dick at this point, too.

This is more subjective, but what did @LEWIS540 say that indicates support of the streamer? He says that both come across as assholes. While I don't agree with a general "bothsideism" character of his post, I definitely think the streamer was more in the wrong, it does seem like a poor decision from someone in his middle age who should have much more to lose at this point in his life by risking the sort of legal action he has by initiating battery of someone on film. I emphasize "initiate". Because Tiki threw the first blow. He escalated it to violence. The other man hadn't even adopted a fighting stance, so the law is less likely to forgive Tiki for self-defense. Yes, the law takes this stuff into consideration.

Because, he's right, it was a cheap shot. It's not 100% cheap because I believe most of us agree that if you're hurling fighting words at someone else, you should be prepared to throw hands, and I side with @Fedorgasm, who although he agreed it was a cheap shot, found himself sympathetic to Tiki for throwing it. But there is nothing about @LEWIS540's post that indicates support for the streamer.

Tiki was the role model of the early 2000s tapout d-bags.

Weird dude. Always in bar fights, thought he was the greatest thing since sliced bread (lost 4 straight UFC bouts all via finish and then goes to the WEC and gets finished 3 straight times), classic Lawler fight were he grabs the mic afterwords claiming he wasn't KO'd while the replay shows him unconscious.

Ends up on the TV show blind date and then later bangs Ariana Celeste. Ends up as Rampage Jacksons manager but even Rampage semi joked that most of the time he was a butler running errands for him and his friends.

Really odd

Finally, you have @560ti who didn't comment on the elbow exchange at all. He simply documented a relevant history within the context of Sherdog/MMA about Tiki.

For some reason, you misread one (or more) of these guys as somehow supporting the streamer. Why? I can't figure out how.

 

[LEWIS540]

Its indirect support when you spend your post attacking, saying how shitty a person the victim is, and saying absolutely zero about the mouthy prick of a perpetrator.

“The victim”.

LOL.

 

[RichardHarrow]

 

[Slobodan]

So nothing of value was hurt.

Tiki was your favourite fighter.