- Joined
- Jul 25, 2021
- Messages
- 1,925
- Reaction score
- 2,268
They were talking like the striking differential was close or Vanderaa was outlanding Arlovski as deciding factors of him taking the rounds, while it was mostly from Wanderaa's knees to Arlovski's thigh in the clinch. Stranger still, it ended up being a split decision.
To me it seems like exploiting ambiguity in understanding what are deciding factors in a fight, equating some strikes to be equal to head strikes as seen fit for the narrative.
To me it seems like exploiting ambiguity in understanding what are deciding factors in a fight, equating some strikes to be equal to head strikes as seen fit for the narrative.
Last edited: