Discussion in 'Pro Wrestling Discussion' started by Michael Scott, Jul 2, 2020.
Who's with me!?
idk man. Undertaker just seems so slow and could collapse anytime
Match will probably suck but Id watch
I'd rather see Sting vs. Flair one more time.
Would take Sting vs Cena. That would probably be pretty safe and a decent match.
If they start filming it now they might, MIGHT, get an adequate cinematic match out of it in 9 months.
Sting going 0-3 would be amusing.
The way WWE does things, they would both have them doing retirement matches against separate opponents.
Vince against Undertaker
Shane O' Mac against Sting
Both McMahons win.
Nah, no point in beating a dead horse. Wwe would have him do a job at mania for Corbin
Sting would probably kill him with a Stinger Splash.
I'm so glad we got taker vs Goldberg instead.
If WWE can do some sort of taped cinematic match then yeah
I think that could be a way to make Sting and Taker look like a million bucks
Of course Vince would screw it up and demand it be Surfer Sting and Biker-Taker
This could work.
Just don't want to see Sting lose again.
No! just a disaster waiting to happen, Sting might break and Taker can't move like he use to
Considering Takers last "Match" vs AJ odds are it'll be another movie type match
Why the fuck didn't this happen in 2015? Oh yeah HHH is a cunt.
Sting is in his 60s and Taker's slower than molasses these days. I voted "don't care" but I'm actually sitting here considering changing it to a straight no.
I want to have sexual relations with Margot Robbie, it's good to have dreams.
Only if the match goes less than 10 minutes total (including Takers entrance). I'm fine with nostalgia, but let's keep it short and sweet.
Separate names with a comma.