Steven Spielberg vs. Stanley Kubrick - Who's the better director?

Who's the better director?

  • Steven Spielberg

  • Stanley Kubrick


Results are only viewable after voting.

Takes_Two_To_Tango

Formally known as MXZT
Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
32,001
Reaction score
42,119
Both legendary directors. I guess both are different in their own ways, but who's better?



 
Not a Kubrick fan....

Not huge on Spielberg either,
But I'll chose him anyway.
 
Not a huge fan of either, but Spielberg has done more in a more broad range.
 
Spielberg is best director of all time easily imo

1. Saving private Ryan
2. Indiana Jones TRILOGY
3. Jaws
4. Jurassic Park
5. Catch me if you can
 
Come on, that's not even debatable. Spielberg it's good with cheap sentimentalism and that's it.
Kubrick has created masterpiece after masterpiece.
 
Apples/Oranges and Kubrick died, making this a tough call.

Spielberg is more audience friendly whereas Kubrick was more of an auteur.

I don't think Spielberg would have done as good of a job with 2001, A Clockwork Orange etc. and Kubrick could never have made Raiders of the Lost Ark or Jurassic Park.
 
I wanna throw an Eyes Wide Shut party at my house.

tumblr_mt258tPWlI1sbx7luo1_500.gif
 
QT wins any director contest imo.

U may not like him but Caneron is pretty Greta too
 
2 of my favorites actually. Kubrick put out some true masterpieces, but Spielberg put out so much more and it was also high quality stuff.
 
In that context you can argue Kubrick's premature death keeps him from battling Spielberg's output fairly
I dunno. Usually I feel that Kubrick mastered one film, and just kept doing that. I prefer Spielberg's overall theme of Family Foibles, particularly Fathers and Sons, over Kubrick's monotonous Civilization on the Brink of Chaos.
 
Back
Top