Social Steven crowder demonetized

the comments crowder made about this dude absolutely come off as homophobia and harassment. crowder is a fucking low IQ douche bag

Referring to someone as gay or queer is homophobic? What does the Q stand for in LGBTQ?

Also how is this harassment? It's just a response video mocking someone they disagree with. That's a huge part of youtube and especially the political side of youtube.
 
Referring to someone as gay or queer is homophobic? What does the Q stand for in LGBTQ?

Also how is this harassment? It's just a response video mocking someone they disagree with. That's a huge part of youtube and especially the political side of youtube.
Calling someone a queer in a derogatory way, repeatedly, is absolutely harassment. Wtf are you talking about? Why are you idiots acting like you don't know how real life works? Hey man, do you work with any gay people? Why don't you challenge them on their political views in the break room and then start calling them a "lispy little queer mexican". Tell me how that works out for you. Oh, politics in the work place, right. Okay, find a gay guy that works somewhere else, and start showing up at his work and insulting his politics while you refer to him as a lispy mexican queer. Do that repeatedly about two dozen times and tell me how that works out for you.

Like dude, was that really necessary? Did I really have to spell all of that out for you? Why are you fucking idiots acting like you suddenly don't know how life works?????

Why can't Crowder stick to the ideas and the facts? I thought the rights ideas are all based on FACTS and LOGIC. And the right BTFOS the left. Isn't that how it works? If thats the case why do you need to bring up and rag on someones sexuality or their race? You make your arguments and your ideas look bad when you cant stick to the argument and have to personally insult the other person.
 
And leftists claim everyone to the right of them are triggered snowflakes. :rolleyes:

There's a lot of triggere snowflakes on the left. If you think the right is any different I suggest you go check the Robert Deniro divorce thread. At least Crowder ain't losing quarter of a billion.
 
Calling someone a queer in a derogatory way, repeatedly, is absolutely harassment. Wtf are you talking about? Why are you idiots acting like you don't know how real life works?

Is queer not the accepted word to use? I really don't get the rules here. If a feminist is mocking a man and says man derogatory is that now some kind of hate speech against men? If you use liberal or conservative in a negative manner is that now harassing?

Hey man, do you work with any gay people? Why don't you challenge them on their political views in the break room and then start calling them a "lispy little queer mexican".

Why would I want to mock or insult my co worker? I never argued that Crowder was being nice to the guy. He should be shut down for using some mean words?

Tell me how that works out for you. Oh, politics in the work place, right. Okay, find a gay guy that works somewhere else, and start showing up at his work and insulting his politics while you refer to him as a lispy mexican queer. Do that repeatedly about two dozen times and tell me how that works out for you.

Oh do you agree then that insulting someone's politics is also harassing?

Like dude, was that really necessary? Did I really have to spell all of that out for you? Why are you fucking idiots acting like you suddenly don't know how life works?????

It's not illegal to insult someone and the internet is the internet.

Why can't Crowder stick to the ideas and the facts? I thought the rights ideas are all based on FACTS and LOGIC. And the right BTFOS the left. Isn't that how it works? If thats the case why do you need to bring up and rag on someones sexuality or their race? You make your arguments and your ideas look bad when you cant stick to the argument and have to personally insult the other person.

I don't know what left wing channels you might subscribe to but I see some of them do the same type of thing. Attacking someone personally and not just sticking to ideas and facts. Also Crowder is far more comedy than those supposedly serious channels.
 
He’s also a lying piece of shit.


It’s so typical of right wing pundits to play the victim.
 
Calling someone a queer in a derogatory way, repeatedly, is absolutely harassment. Wtf are you talking about? Why are you idiots acting like you don't know how real life works? Hey man, do you work with any gay people? Why don't you challenge them on their political views in the break room and then start calling them a "lispy little queer mexican". Tell me how that works out for you. Oh, politics in the work place, right. Okay, find a gay guy that works somewhere else, and start showing up at his work and insulting his politics while you refer to him as a lispy mexican queer. Do that repeatedly about two dozen times and tell me how that works out for you.

Like dude, was that really necessary? Did I really have to spell all of that out for you? Why are you fucking idiots acting like you suddenly don't know how life works?????

Why can't Crowder stick to the ideas and the facts? I thought the rights ideas are all based on FACTS and LOGIC. And the right BTFOS the left. Isn't that how it works? If thats the case why do you need to bring up and rag on someones sexuality or their race? You make your arguments and your ideas look bad when you cant stick to the argument and have to personally insult the other person.
They genuinely don't care about any of that. They just want to get back with whatever they can at the libs, truth be damned, and in the case of people like Crowder make a shit ton of money doing it. Either by paid ads on youtube, or by being funded by the Koch brothers (Dave Rubin).

Every now and then they'll get themselves banned from a big platform just so they can whine about it and pretend it's because of their conservative politics, when it's clearly about them not following the rules they agreed to follow when signing up their account. It's the same here: there's plenty of right wing posters who continuously whine about the mods having an anti-conservative bias when it's clear they just can't follow the rules.
 
He’s also a lying piece of shit.


It’s so typical of right wing pundits to play the victim.


Extremely bias video saying stuff that is just an opinion with no proof to it. Hurr Durr "His goal was to smear union workers as violent thugs".
 
Obviously my point is that the channel is less serious and more focused on joking around.
It's political "comedy", emphasis on the political. His big breakthrough was the "change my mind" series, which was mainly serious. He wants it both ways: take me serious because I'm a conservative smart guy but also don't take me serious because I'm just a comedian.
 
Extremely bias video saying stuff that is just an opinion with no proof to it. Hurr Durr "His goal was to smear union workers as violent thugs".
"Ready let's do this."

The guy just fell on the floor after being close to Steven who put his hands on him, and chose to attack Crowder because he's a nutty liberal.

You don't think the editing is proof of trying to hide something?
 
It's political "comedy", emphasis on the political. His big breakthrough was the "change my mind" series, which was mainly serious. He wants it both ways: take me serious because I'm a conservative smart guy but also don't take me serious because I'm just a comedian.

Yeah that's pretty accurate. No one thinks of him as a serious debater type of guy except maybe a big fan of his who doesn't know any better yet.
 
"Ready let's do this."

The guy just fell on the floor after being close to Steven who put his hands on him, and chose to attack Crowder because he's a nutty liberal.

You don't think the editing is proof of trying to hide something?

Being close to someone means you must have attacked him right? Yeah no.

Why would he care to edit it when it doesn't show anything else? He's standing near to the guy and then you don't see how the guy ended up on the ground. Not really any different from the edited video which Crowder claims he didn't edit.
 
Being close to someone means you must have attacked him right? Yeah no.

Why would he care to edit it when it doesn't show anything else? He's standing near to the guy and then you don't see how the guy ended up on the ground. Not really any different from the edited video which Crowder claims he didn't edit.
His hand is literally on the guy's back as he's falling, right after he says "Ready let's do this". It's clear dishonesty.

"Why would he care to edit it when it doesn't show anything else?" You answered your own question. It shows something else besides the sob story Crowder put out.
 
The guy falling next to Crowder is evidence of nothing.
It's evidence that he didn't assault Crowder for no reason. Crowder had his hand on the guy's back as he was falling, right after he said "ready let's do this". He also chose to edit this part out. Why do you think he chose to edit this part out?
 
It's evidence that he didn't assault Crowder for no reason.

Him being on the ground is not proof that Crowder did something to deserve getting hit for.

Crowder had his hand on the guy's back as he was falling,

You seem pretty confident of that so why don't you try to pause the video where you see Crowder's hand on the guy's back. I would really like to see that.

right after he said "ready let's do this". He also chose to edit this part out. Why do you think he chose to edit this part out?

You're assuming the edited video was from him. How do you know that?

On a side note if you have watched all of the tape on this event you would know that the guy who hit Steven had started instigating with him earlier and following him around. Looks like a guy who would be happy to find any excuse to throw a punch at him.
 
Extremely bias video saying stuff that is just an opinion with no proof to it. Hurr Durr "His goal was to smear union workers as violent thugs".

You wouldn't be defending the violent criminal like Crowder now would ya? Oh the irony
He edited the video, specifically for that reason, he instigated so that he can claim his victimhood status when someone retaliated... But I guess you aren't in favor of self defense when it doesn't server your dishonest partisan hackery

Muh muh muh antifa REEEEE
 
You wouldn't be defending the violent criminal like Crowder now would ya? Oh the irony

Could just make an argument instead of being passive aggressive. But maybe you're hesitant because in all of our discussions you just kept getting proven wrong.

Edit: Also cute coming from the Antifa defender.
 
Him being on the ground is not proof that Crowder did something to deserve getting hit for.



You seem pretty confident of that so why don't you try to pause the video where you see Crowder's hand on the guy's back. I would really like to see that.



You're assuming the edited video was from him. How do you know that?

On a side note if you have watched all of the tape on this event you would know that the guy who hit Steven had started instigating with him earlier and following him around. Looks like a guy who would be happy to find any excuse to throw a punch at him.
I can't watch it again right now, but why do you think he says "Ready, let's do this" right before the altercation?
 
Back
Top