Social Steven crowder demonetized

wtf are you babbling about?
You're in this thread bitching about privately owned websites enforcing their rules against what they deem hate speech.

Sherdog enforces this rule exactly the same as YouTube, yet you won't say shit. You'll stay here posting under these rules like the little cuck you are.
 
Still waiting on your evidence that he faked it because you made that claim.

Alright, what in your view would constitute evidence that he edited the audio? The numerous accounts of others who posted videos asking the same questions and getting different results? You would then claim that THEY were the ones doing the editing, for which of course you'll have no proof. Or you'll claim that Amazon changed it hours after Crowder posted the video.. of which of course you will also have no evidence.

"jesus christ was a fictional character" is not the type of answer Alexa gives, its too limited. But your dishonest quackery will never allow you to admit being wrong, so keep sippin'
 
You're in this thread bitching about privately owned websites enforcing their rules against what they deem hate speech.

Sherdog enforces this rule exactly the same as YouTube, yet you won't say shit.

I think you are misrepresenting what I have said. Youtube can do whatever they are allowed to do. They just need to be consistent about it. I was criticizing the arguments people are using in regards to harassment and "hate speech".

You'll stay here posting under these rules like the little cuck you are

You're premise is faulty but you sound really dumb so I'll try not to pick on you. It might be "harassing".
 
Alright, what in your view would constitute evidence that he edited the audio? The numerous accounts of others who posted videos asking the same questions and getting different results?

There are people claiming to have had the same results as well.

You would then claim that THEY were the ones doing the editing, for which of course you'll have no proof. Or you'll claim that Amazon changed it hours after Crowder posted the video.. of which of course you will also have no evidence.

"jesus christ was a fictional character" is not the type of answer Alexa gives, its too limited. But your dishonest quackery will never allow you to admit being wrong, so keep sippin'

You made the claim so you provide the evidence. If you have none then don't make the claim.
 
There are people claiming to have had the same results as well.



You made the claim so you provide the evidence. If you have none then don't make the claim.


Ok buddy, I have some ufo and Bigfoot conspiracies to sell you
 
Ok buddy, I have some ufo and Bigfoot conspiracies to sell you

You're the one claiming the conspiracy dumbass.

I'm the one asking for evidence so you go enjoy some conspiracy videos since you don't need any apparently.
 
You're the one claiming the conspiracy dumbass.

Careful boy, wouldn't want to throw that rock around in that glass house of yours. You are uninformed enough to buy his "raw unedited" video as proof, when its obvious the track has been rendered already... But I guess you can't expect intelligence from a reactionary
 
They genuinely don't care about any of that. They just want to get back with whatever they can at the libs, truth be damned, and in the case of people like Crowder make a shit ton of money doing it. Either by paid ads on youtube, or by being funded by the Koch brothers (Dave Rubin).

Every now and then they'll get themselves banned from a big platform just so they can whine about it and pretend it's because of their conservative politics, when it's clearly about them not following the rules they agreed to follow when signing up their account. It's the same here: there's plenty of right wing posters who continuously whine about the mods having an anti-conservative bias when it's clear they just can't follow the rules.
I thought their half-asian lawyer and youtube haven't found anything wrong with their content? What are these rules that they specifically broke?
 
when its obvious the track has been rendered already...

There's the accusation with no proof again. It's obvious the problem here is people like you who hate Crowder are perfectly fine making these accusations with no evidence. If it was someone you liked or were indifferent to you would give the benefit of the doubt and ask for actual evidence.
 
Give me a fucking break with this "no evidence" crap. Sounds to me that unless Crowder himself admits to it, you won't believe anything

Someone else did a thorough breakdown of it:

Amazon Echo
1. Amazon sells a voice-enabledproduct called the Echo, which uses a virtual assistant called Alexa.
3. Amazon launched the Echo on 05/23/15,, the market cap of Amazon was about 205 billion.
4. The market cap of Amazon when Crowder initially posted his video last week was about 571 billion, a 366 billion (279%) increase over 29 months.
5. Voice enabled speakers are growing rapidly, and as of this May Article, the market grew by 129%, year over year, with the Echo accounting for 70.6% of the 35.6 million speakers or about 25.1 million.
6. The Echo was exclusively available in the US/Canada, Germany, and the UK, although it just recently launched in India and Japan.
7. These initial countries have about 333 million Christians (65.4% of population) compared to only about 11 million (2.2% of population).
8. Given religious practices and distribution of wealth, the 333.2 millino Christians are probably far more likely to use the technology than the 11 million Muslims.


Steven Crowder
1. Comedian
2. Christian
3. Conservative
4. Primarily known for his political commentary, most notably for criticizing liberals and secularism.

Crowder's Claim
1. Alexa called Jesus a fictional character but Muhammad a wise profit, which would not only be anti-Christian it would be pro-Muslim.
3. This anti-Christian, pro-Muslim message was a result of the leftist bias of Amazon.
4. Crowder did not fake or manipulate the outcome in anyway.
5. Crowder's evidence for the lack of manipulation is a video of the incident.

Assumptions necessary to back Crowder's claims
1. One of the most successful companies in the history, has decided to directly insult the faith of 2.4 billion Christians worldwide (33% of world population).
2. More specifically, based on the demographic and geographic characteristics of Amazon's primary market's, Christians would represent the vast majority of the the consumer base.
3. Instead Amazon specifically catered to a religion that represents a small minority of its consumer base.
4. Amazon decided to use their agenda on a rapidly growing technology market as they try to not only increase sales but maintain their market share.
5. This anti-Christian, pro-Muslim agenda, either went unnoticed for nearly 29 months by its 20+ million users, or it was just recently programmed.
5. If it was just recently programmed, then Amazon decided to do this right before a biggest shopping days of the year.
6. If it had gone unnoticed for a long time, (or even if recent)somehow the person to finally noticed it happened to be a popular political commentator, whose popularity is based upon criticizing the same agenda he happened to discover here.
7. In order for the video to completely support the lack of manipulation on Crowder's part beforehand, he must have been filming it upon his random discovery.


So for Crowder's claims to be true, then Amazon is ran by or relies on a bunch of incompetent idiots and/or is actively trying to harm its own name and business for some unknown reason AND Crowder is the luckiest political commentator of all time by stumbling upon something that just happens to perfectly fit his commentary.


NONSENSE, any thinking person could see right through it.. He is a liar through and through as are his supporters and defenders
 
You people complaining about "liberal censorship" don't seem this get this decision is 100% about MONEY.

They don't want links to T-Shirt stores that say "Socialism is for f*gs."

It's homophobic and that's not good for business. Everything is always 100% about profit. It's not a political agenda.
 
You people complaining about "liberal censorship" don't seem this get this decision is 100% about MONEY.

They don't want links to T-Shirt stores that say "Socialism is for f*gs."


But see, thats the market working against them, so it doesnt count.
It's homophobic and that's not good for business. Everything is always 100% about profit. It's not a political agenda.
 
"Ready let's do this."

The guy just fell on the floor after being close to Steven who put his hands on him, and chose to attack Crowder because he's a nutty liberal.

You don't think the editing is proof of trying to hide something?

The editing was weird but I have a hard time believing the Steven Crowder has the balls to grab that guy and throw him on the ground. I don't know what happened looks like the crowd was rushing so maybe the guy was knocked over I don't know.
 
This is no longer true my friend. And when you realize this all it brings about is more questions.

Even media outlets that are slanted one way politically is like that on purpose ultimately for profits. Every single channel, website, newspaper - CNN, MSNBC, Fox News, NY Times, every one of them - the motive is profit. If not profit for the channel itself, then for the parent company - ABC owned by Disney, NBC owned by Comcast, etc.

Political websites operate to get the maximum amount of clicks.
 
Like feckless cunt or cock holster? Aren't those still up and monetized?
Go report those videos contact YT if you have a problem with them.
For now people can still watch his content, he has not been banned or, as far as I know, even had any of his videos removed so this is all hypothetical talk. Even Pewdiepie is still on YT and he said :eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:. Do you really think he's entitled to monetization on YT?
 
If he removes the links for his shirts they will monetize him again. It's not about his language its the shirts.
I know, I was talking about the "joke" on the shirt in question that got him demonetized.
And then the dude whine about the figs shirt because he didn't get the joke.
^ Everyone got it, it wasn't funny, and now Crowder has to pay the price for it.
 
I am late to this.

Youtube said they won't pay him but allow him to post and host his videos? How is this wrong? They are a private company and should be able to determine who they will pay for views or not based on their standards. They should be under no obligation to pay him if he posts views that youtube advertisers don't want to be associated with.

What prevents him from running advertisements during his videos. Is there anything preventing him from getting ED drugs or fleshlight from paying him and for him to mention how good those products are while he is trying to do his "comedy"?
 
is this the end of louder with crowder?

This is different than Barry dillons thread saying only supremacists are banned

If you dont know the story, some whiny liberal bitch cried to YouTube about crowder. Crowder wasn’t banned, but YouTube is now cracking down on many independent journalists and content makers.

YouTube says they will promote large media companies more and scale back promoting independent content makers.

The media is pissed that guys like Tim pool get WAY more viewship numbers per week than major cnn anchors on cable tv.

Can’t have freedom. Of course the left rejoices.




Probably he should get a job and stop relying on Youtube to pay his bills, eh eh?
 
I am late to this.

Youtube said they won't pay him but allow him to post and host his videos? How is this wrong? They are a private company and should be able to determine who they will pay for views or not based on their standards. They should be under no obligation to pay him if he posts views that youtube advertisers don't want to be associated with.
Yeah I really don't get it either. If they had banned him I would've said that was too far but someone as edgy and political as him should've realized this could happen.
What prevents him from running advertisements during his videos. Is there anything preventing him from getting ED drugs or fleshlight from paying him and for him to mention how good those products are while he is trying to do his "comedy"?
He does advertise on his channel, for his own merchandise actually which is smart. It was one of the shirts he advertises that got him demonetized, specifically this one
https://reviewshirt.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Socialism-is-for-:eek::eek::eek:s-The-Louder-with-Crowder-Shirt.jpg
He can get monetization again if he removes the shirt from his store.
 
Back
Top