- Joined
- Oct 16, 2015
- Messages
- 5,971
- Reaction score
- 902
It’s not that easy to tell what’s acting or not in a situation where someone is just concussed. Behaviors aren’t expected to be normal or follow a fixed pattern.
Exactly. The Mayo clinic has a fairly long list of possible concussion indicators, including:
Other signs and symptoms of a concussion include:
- Confusion or feeling as if in a fog
- Amnesia surrounding the traumatic event
- Dizziness or "seeing stars"
Stirling might have been acting, but if so I'll give him credit for going for symptoms that match those indicated by one of the best hospitals in the world.
One interesting point I haven't seen mentioned: in most other contact sports (especially the NFL and NHL) someone taking a head shot like Stirling did would immediately be taken out of the game, because even if they can get back on their head in a few minutes they're medically not fit to continue (ie they've increased susceptibility to the next hit https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second-impact_syndrome).
So if Stirling had been able to continue, he would have done so with a much weakened chin -- Yan's illegal knee would have given Yan a major advantage. In fact, throwing illegal strikes (like that knee, or eye-pokes) is a way of gaining significant unearned advantage. Its possible that Stirling knew he could continue, but only at 50%. Should he continue under those circumstances? If I were his coach I'd say no, you shouldn't let your opponent benefit from his illegal action.
The only way I can think of making continuing the fight fair would be to let the fighter fouled get a free shot like the one they took. In this case, put Yan on his knees and let Stirling knee him. That of course would get the UFC sued so quickly that it could never happen (and likely would even be against the law), but any other way of continuing the fight means an unearned advantage for the fighter who did the foul.
Last edited: