vladimirtzu
Orange Belt
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2006
- Messages
- 317
- Reaction score
- 0
I like 5/3/1 better because you don't have to deal with plateaus, missing weights and trying to figure out if you should push through, are ready for a mini-reset or full reset, etc., as early.
People say SS is a better beginner program all the time, but I think that is overlooking the fact that after about 2.5 months most lifters on SS are going to be in a place where they have to make some tough programming decisions without a whole lot of experience to draw from.
If you have a coach, SS might be better, but 5/3/1 is better if you want to avoid ambiguity for a longer time period.
Most definitely.
Again, it's not that SS doesn't have a dramatically faster rate of progression on paper. It's that it rarely works out like that for anything but the smallest amounts of time.
Again using myself as an example, I got 70 percent of my gains in the first two months of starting strength. But because I fought through all the suggested resets, slowed the progression, etc. etc, I dragged the program out another 3 or 4, making the rate of progression in a 6 month time span dramatically lower then it would have been if I hit it and quit it. And that's the only point I'm trying to make. If you do Starting Strength, do it til shit plateaus, and fuck the resets, move on.