Social Spying on Trump confirmed: Operation Crossfire Hurricane ***UPDATE: Comey Admits, "I Was Wrong" ***

Not without proper predication.

That's not for me or you to say. There is proper protocol for this stuff, much like there is in any investigation. Even if Trump was truly suspected of having some shady dealings, they better have crossed their T's and dotted their I's before going after him. They can't just game the system because they had a feeling.

Checks and balances and all that.
 
A reminder, we already know for a FACT from bakers testimony that protocol was broken in the Hillary investigation, and Comeys fireside chats, DOJ leaks, etc.


If you think it’s impossible protocol was broken spying on trump, you need to re-evaluate your bias.
 
Can you post your fantasy porn somewhere else please?

It’s a legitimate area of inquiry given Comey’s suicidal ideation. If he’s tipped off ahead of time, they may find him hanging from a tree. Personally I think a pre-dawn raid is the best route, so they catch him off guard.
 
I'm not surprised, now that I've known you this long, you would be this confused.

That isn't an indictment related to Barr's proposed investigation of surveillance abuse. That's another indictment substantiating the validity of the Mueller investigation I supported. The one you opposed.

Still on snooze, princess.

And it's now being used against Obama's underlings.

The investigation that the left fully supported is now being used as a rod for their own backs.

<{Heymansnicker}>

<20>

<13>

Justice couldn't be more poetic.
 
It’s a legitimate area of inquiry given Comey’s suicidal ideation. If he’s tipped off ahead of time, they may find him hanging from a tree. Personally I think a pre-dawn raid is the best route, so they catch him off guard.

Thanks to Obamacare, you can get insurance to pay for your antipsychotic medications. They should really help with your delusions.
 
Tbh, it wouldn’t surprise me if every president gets ‘spied’ on. Everyone is watching everyone, like that scene in ‘Casino’ when DeNiro is breaking it down lol
 
Aren’t you that guy who was talkin bout muh Russian collusion?

I still stand by all that I have posted, but we can talk about that later, don't try to deflect, for everyone's edification, please lay out your analysis of the legal jeopardy Comey finds himself in.<{Heymansnicker}>
 
And it's now being used against Obama's underlings.

The investigation that the left fully supported is now being used as a rod for their own backs.

<{Heymansnicker}>

<20>

<13>

Justice couldn't be more poetic.
its not really that poetic. Obamas administration, by and large, wasnt crawling with corruption, cronyism, and outright illegality. Its why theres only been one of his staffers in hot water vs Trumps admin having dozens of possible convictions.
Conservatives would count as a victory 1 Obama staffer getting jail time if it meant 100 Trump bots get pokey time.
 
its not really that poetic. Obamas administration, by and large, wasnt crawling with corruption, cronyism, and outright illegality. Its why theres only been one of his staffers in hot water vs Trumps admin having dozens of possible convictions.
Conservatives would count as a victory 1 Obama staffer getting jail time if it meant 100 Trump bots get pokey time.

This new facet of the investigation is only just beginning. Now the former Obama administration will face the same level of scrutiny as the administration of President Trump.

Those on the left have been saying for 2 years how we need a full, robust, and complete investigation.

Be careful what you wish for lefties, you just might get it.

<13>
 
@Farmer Br0wn
@bobgeese

Don't be wishy washy, pick something I said to talk about, if you are coming on, COME ON!!!







Below is all that needs to be said.


“A reminder, we already know for a FACT from bakers testimony that protocol was broken in the Hillary investigation, and Comeys fireside chats, DOJ leaks, etc.


If you think it’s impossible protocol was broken spying on trump, you need to re-evaluate your bias.”




PS, truthfully I thought what I quoted was in the Meuller investigation thread. If you agree with the above, than I have no quarrel with you good sir.
 
Below is all that needs to be said.


“A reminder, we already know for a FACT from bakers testimony that protocol was broken in the Hillary investigation, and Comeys fireside chats, DOJ leaks, etc.


If you think it’s impossible protocol was broken spying on trump, you need to re-evaluate your bias.”




PS, truthfully I thought what I quoted was in the Meuller investigation thread. If you agree with the above, than I have no quarrel with you good sir.

Let's get down to brass tacks on any of those points though, as all of the usual right wing talking points are easily disabused as bullshit (e.g., Comey "leaking classified information", Comey corruptly making up his mind about Hillary before she sat down for her FBI interview, etc., etc.,). Comey has been very open about everything in his professional career, from battling Cheney's goons about torture and domestic spying in the Bush Administration, to why he felt the need to put the integrity of the DOJ over politics when he "knifed" Hillary in 2016, to why he went after Martha Stewart for lying about an insider trade which saved her about the amount of money that falls off her desk in about 30 minutes. Trump did some very weird shit in his interactions with Comey before Comey was fired, and he said some very weird shit after Comey was fired. And after Comey "leaked" his memos, what did Rosenstein (the man who had just written the justification for his firing) do? He didn't go after Comey for leaking classified information <45>he considered wearing a wire in his interactions with Trump, he pondered the 25th Amendment (and supposedly 2 members of Trump's cabinet were on board), and Comey actually heard from his FBI folks that Rosenstein wanted to know what Comey thought he should do before he, the Trump appointed, GOP senate confirmed, republican deputy attorney general, appointed Mueller.

In sum, Comey isn't concerned, don't let Barr's "spying" bullshit fool you (which he couldn't offer any evidence for and later walked back through anonymous sources), Barr is about as credible as Sean Spicer at this point, but at least Spicer could offer talking points without appearing to have a stroke in the middle of them.



“Um, did you say that I said that it occurred?” Barr had replied.<{you!}>

“I just want to make it clear, thinking back on all the different colloquies here, that I am not saying that improper surveillance occurred,” Barr offered at the close of the hearing. “I am saying I am concerned about it and looking into it, that’s all.”
 
So what's the official line on this now? I remember it was definantly no surveillance and now it is ok yes there was surveillance but it was fine to do?
 
Let's get down to brass tacks on any of those points though, as all of the usual right wing talking points are easily disabused as bullshit (e.g., Comey "leaking classified information", Comey corruptly making up his mind about Hillary before she sat down for her FBI interview, etc., etc.,). Comey has been very open about everything in his professional career, from battling Cheney's goons about torture and domestic spying in the Bush Administration, to why he felt the need to put the integrity of the DOJ over politics when he "knifed" Hillary in 2016, to why he went after Martha Stewart for lying about an insider trade which saved her about the amount of money that falls off her desk in about 30 minutes. Trump did some very weird shit in his interactions with Comey before Comey was fired, and he said some very weird shit after Comey was fired. And after Comey "leaked" his memos, what did Rosenstein (the man who had just written the justification for his firing) do? He didn't go after Comey for leaking classified information <45>he considered wearing a wire in his interactions with Trump, he pondered the 25th Amendment (and supposedly 2 members of Trump's cabinet were on board), and Comey actually heard from his FBI folks that Rosenstein wanted to know what Comey thought he should do before he, the Trump appointed, GOP senate confirmed, republican deputy attorney general, appointed Mueller.

In sum, Comey isn't concerned, don't let Barr's "spying" bullshit fool you (which he couldn't offer any evidence for and later walked back through anonymous sources), Barr is about as credible as Sean Spicer at this point, but at least Spicer could offer talking points without appearing to have a stroke in the middle of them.



“Um, did you say that I said that it occurred?” Barr had replied.<{you!}>

“I just want to make it clear, thinking back on all the different colloquies here, that I am not saying that improper surveillance occurred,” Barr offered at the close of the hearing. “I am saying I am concerned about it and looking into it, that’s all.”





That’s a fancy way of dancing around my statement.


Btw, the IG is taking this very seriously. Halper has been interviewed 3 times.

IG + AG > cake
 
So what's the official line on this now? I remember it was definantly no surveillance and now it is ok yes there was surveillance but it was fine to do?

If you are referring to Trump blabbering about McCarthyism and saying "Obama had my wires tapped", yes that is still bat shit. Was the FBI looking at George P, yes, were they looking at Manafort, yes, were they looking at Carter Page yes, and they were looking at him long before Trump. And, Comey didn't announce that Trump's campaign was under investigation before the election, which you know, you would want to do if the point was the prevent him from becoming president.
 
So what's the official line on this now? I remember it was definantly no surveillance and now it is ok yes there was surveillance but it was fine to do?
7q7b.jpg




<TheDonald>
 
Back
Top