• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Social Spying on Trump confirmed: Operation Crossfire Hurricane ***UPDATE: Comey Admits, "I Was Wrong" ***

Which intelligence agency suspects Kilimnik of being a Kremlin "operative"?
If you want me to answer your questions then you have to answer mine first. I am not wasting my time quoting anything if your reply is going to be 'that is not proof. I need to see the raw intel classified data...' or 'a conviction in a court of law', no other evidence will do, type standard that so many sherdogs just dismiss everything else for.

Not playing that game. Not wasting my time.
 
i'm still not sure how it's legal

When you can suspend Habeas Corpus for 'suspected terrorists', commit torture, and undergo acts of rendition...

what's the pt of the Constitution in the first place? Isn't rendition specifically an illegal search and seizure? Maybe it doesn't apply to non citizens, sure, but even worse if we authorized something to do that to OTHER NATION'S citizens.

I may come off as a straight Conservative, but I am a registered Libertarian and completely agree. The Patriot Act is way out of control. I completely agree with your assessment on it.
 
It's time for Obama to make the trip to Mar a Lago and make a deal. He should set the meeting with Trump and admit to Trump... you caught us. But, for the good of the country, this is what we want. You Pardon everyone, we make Lynch the "fall lady" and she gets a pardon too. In return, you look magnanimous, forgiving, and win the 2020 election in a runaway.

The deal needs to be made. It will be incredibly worse for Democrats and the Left if the truth is allowed to come out in full.
 
If you want me to answer your questions then you have to answer mine first. I am not wasting my time quoting anything if your reply is going to be 'that is not proof. I need to see the raw intel classified data...' or 'a conviction in a court of law', no other evidence will do, type standard that so many sherdogs just dismiss everything else for.

Not playing that game. Not wasting my time.
What's your question?

I'm merely asking you to justify a couple of the claims you have made in this thread. If that's too much trouble for you, I will continue to believe that you are making things up.
 
What's your question?

I'm merely asking you to justify a couple of the claims you have made in this thread. If that's too much trouble for you, I will continue to believe that you are making things up.
What standard of 'proof' will you accept?

As an example on a talk I had some time ago about all the Intelligence Agencies in the US admitting Russian interference in the election before Trump did a person here said that was not proof. He needed to see what they were basing their views on and if I could not supply I had nothing.

Many on this site demand court conviction or classified info level documentation from a fellow sherdogger or they will acknowledge nothing as sufficient proof. Everything to them is a trial and they are playing lawyers thinking that makes them seem smart. i've seen you do the latter so that is why I am not interested in wasting my time.

If i can get a senior intelligence official, current or retired, saying on some talking head show that Kiliminich was known to be a Russian asset are you going to accept that as proof and admit you were wrong, or just wave your arms saying that is not sufficient unless I can also produce the info (classified info he would see but we would not) he based that view upon?
 
lol "several potential violations"
This is a girlfriend getting mad because she got caught cheating.
 
Crickets lol

Probably because you posted a story from the President’s literal propaganda network (that he regularly calls into) without substance. Your truck sucks and you pretending to be objective makes me chuckle.

Yawn


Wait, wait... this is it.


Did I do it right?
 
What standard of 'proof' will you accept?

As an example on a talk I had some time ago about all the Intelligence Agencies in the US admitting Russian interference in the election before Trump did a person here said that was not proof. He needed to see what they were basing their views on and if I could not supply I had nothing.

Many on this site demand court conviction or classified info level documentation from a fellow sherdogger or they will acknowledge nothing as sufficient proof. Everything to them is a trial and they are playing lawyers thinking that makes them seem smart. i've seen you do the latter so that is why I am not interested in wasting my time.

If i can get a senior intelligence official, current or retired, saying on some talking head show that Kiliminich was known to be a Russian asset are you going to accept that as proof and admit you were wrong, or just wave your arms saying that is not sufficient unless I can also produce the info (classified info he would see but we would not) he based that view upon?

You do realize that you are doing the exact same thing but from the opposite direction. If a court decision isn’t good enough for a worthless fuck job like yourself than what will be???

Also still waiting for your “proof” or for you to eventually fuck off back to the Mayberry like the last time you got clowned like the pathetic libtard sheep that you are.
 
I love a good CT, especially when it is true.

27ca3eb543e02ddf076e15d19d1498c4.gif
 
Probably because you posted a story from the President’s literal propaganda network (that he regularly calls into) without substance. Your truck sucks and you pretending to be objective makes me chuckle.

Yawn


Wait, wait... this is it.


Did I do it right?
Great response! Now, go fuck yourself.
 
Back
Top