Social Spying on Trump confirmed: Operation Crossfire Hurricane ***UPDATE: Comey Admits, "I Was Wrong" ***

Madmick said:
No, it's pretty obvious that the primary players in this debacle, such as Page and Strzok, acted with a partisan malice.
Click to expand...
But that's not at all what the report concluded generally. At all, and 100% it concluded it was A-political in how it was begun with proper procedures followed and ample evidentiary basis to do so.

Trump and Barr remain, liars.
 
bobgeese said:
Unfortunately, I already showed these goofs the dictionary 60 pages ago. They covered their eyes and kept pretending.


They’re broken.
Click to expand...

Yes, anyone that can't take a step back and say, "yeah, they were spying" is not an honest person. They want to play semantic games.
 
we can add shifty to the fray for spying on other members of congress, these suckers have balls thats for sure
 
Whippy McGee said:
Yes, anyone that can't take a step back and say, "yeah, they were spying" is not an honest person. They want to play semantic games.
Click to expand...

The question isn't "were they being spied on". The question is "why were they being spied on?". Was is for political gain against Trump or some conspiracy, or were there legitimate criminal reasons to look into them and corners were cut?

If they were being spied on because the Democrats had some conspiracy to gather dirt for political purposes, that's a problem (kind of exactly the same situation Trump is being accused of doing in Ukraine now), but if members of the campaign were caught in sketchy behavior and the reasons for spying were justified due to alleged criminal activity then I don't see a problem. Nobody is above the law, especially not political candidates. If they, or their campaign, were doing something illegal or shady, then I would want law enforcement to look into said activities. That's literally their job.
 
PolishHeadlock2 said:
Click to expand...


How about post of the part where an FBI lawyer doctored emails between them and the CIA in regards to Page being a CIA asset. And they are facing criminal charges. Nobody mentioned anything about Obama nor cars about Obama.
 
jgarner said:
The question isn't "were they being spied on". The question is "why were they being spied on?". Was is for political gain against Trump or some conspiracy, or were there legitimate criminal reasons to look into them and corners were cut?

If they were being spied on because the Democrats had some conspiracy to gather dirt for political purposes, that's a problem (kind of exactly the same situation Trump is being accused of doing in Ukraine now), but if members of the campaign were caught in sketchy behavior and the reasons for spying were justified due to alleged criminal activity then I don't see a problem. Nobody is above the law, especially not political candidates. If they, or their campaign, were doing something illegal or shady, then I would want law enforcement to look into said activities. That's literally their job.
Click to expand...

An FBI lawyer DOCTORED EMAILS between them and the CIA to make it look as though Page wasn't a CIA asset when he was. You don't think that isn't a problem?
 
bobgeese said:
Mods have changed the title twice now.


They’re now just deliberately ignoring the AG because???


It’s laughable because anyone with a brain realizes Durham wouldn’t have released that statement for nothing.

I assure you, when Durham’s report is out, it will catch them by surprise just as badly as trump walking after the Meuller flop. Meanwhile we’re like


<seedat><TheDonald><Y2JSmirk>
Click to expand...

That's fucking bullshit.

If they did that to a thread I created, I would keep on changing it back to what it was so fuck all that nonsense.
 
PolishHeadlock2 said:
ahhhhhh

Click to expand...


Care to show those text. And put them side by side to Strzok and Page? Were they lawyers working directly under the 2nd person in chain of command at the FBI? or were they "low level" people as you hint at the lawyer who DOCTORED EMAILS to continue the FISA warrants?

Also not notifying the Trump campaign about possible Foreign influence into his campaign was a huge mistake by the FBI, as stated by Horowitz. It's literally the point of it in the first place, and Hillary was notified about hers. Unbiased still?
 
b34stmode said:
Care to show those text. And put them side by side to Strzok and Page?
Click to expand...

Lol if we're looking for bias we just have to look at the FBI announcing an investigation into Hillary a week before the election and keeping the investigation into Trump's campaign secret to the nation until after the election

And that was actually the rationale Trump used to fire Comey lol
 
PolishHeadlock2 said:
Lol if we're looking for bias we just have to look at the FBI announcing an investigation into Hillary a week before the election and keeping the investigation into Trump's campaign secret to the nation until after the election

And that was actually the rationale Trump used to fire Comey lol
Click to expand...

The only reason the FBI opened that up a week before is the NYPD threatened the FBI to show emails containing classified information found on Hillarys secretarys laptop by Weiner.
 
PolishHeadlock2 said:
Lol if we're looking for bias we just have to look at the FBI announcing an investigation into Hillary a week before the election and keeping the investigation into Trump's campaign secret to the nation until after the election

And that was actually the rationale Trump used to fire Comey lol
Click to expand...

Why did you avoid addressing the point that they did not inform Trump?
 
PolishHeadlock2 said:
Inform him of what?
Click to expand...

That his campaign was being spied on. Oh, I'm sorry...... you're a leftie. Right. Why wasn't Drumph informed that his campaign was being investigated for possible Russian influence within his team?
 
Confucamus said:
That his campaign was being spied on. Oh, I'm sorry...... you're a leftie. Right. Why wasn't Drumph informed that his campaign was being investigated for possible Russian influence within his team?
Click to expand...

Does the FBI normally tell people they are investigating that they are investigating them?

And the FBI did warn him and his campaign that Russia would try to infiltrate the campaign.

His response was to go on TV and ask them to release Clinton's e-mails
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,072
Messages
57,966,832
Members
175,884
Latest member
cloudfair

Share this page

Back
Top