Social Spying on Trump confirmed: Operation Crossfire Hurricane ***UPDATE: Comey Admits, "I Was Wrong" ***

[GelatinousMusic]

This thread is going to explode once the IG report comes out.

I can’t help but think Strzok will ultimately be the only one to face time.

 

[Bargey]

That gif perfectly sums up your effort

 

[ShadowRun]

The plot thickens !!

 

[Seano]

Shame the moderators here are so pathetic at addressing it.

Thats a pretty embarrassing post. If you want to fish for someone to get banned, at least have some pride and do it in a private message.

 

[Cake4Breakfast]

You folks didn’t think this was going away, did you?

https://mobile.twitter.com/kilmeade/status/1119221694714060801?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1119221694714060801&ref_url=https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/breaking-papadopoulos-just-dropped-two-new-names-in-spygate-says-mueller-got-it-wrong/

Special counsel Robert Mueller alleges in his report on the Russia investigation that Mifsud lied to the FBI about the timeline of his contacts with George Papadopoulos, Also on Thursday, an Italian newspaper revealed that after Mifsud was first linked to Papadopoulos, he allegedly went into hiding for months, living at a Rome apartment owned by Link International. The company controls Link Campus, a university in Rome that partners closely with Western intelligence agencies.

Mifsud and Papadopoulos first met March 14, 2016, at Link Campus, days after Papadopoulos found out he would be joining the Trump team.


“An FBI asset named Joseph Mifsud dropped unsolicited info in my lap about ‘Russians having Clinton’s emails,'” Papadopoulos wrote on Twitter, referring to a fateful meeting he had with Mifsud in April 2016.

Papadopoulos and Mifsud became fast friends after the initial meeting. They began corresponding online, and met in London on March 24, 2016. Mifsud introduced Papadopoulos to a woman he claimed to be the niece of Russian President Vladimir Putin. Mifsud introduced the woman as Olga Vinagradova, though it was later determined that her real name is Olga Polonskaya and that she is not related to Putin.

Mueller’s report contains new details about Mifsud and Polonskaya, including that they might have been in a relationship at the time they were in contact with Papadopoulos. Mueller also revealed Mifsud was drafting and editing some of Polonskaya’s messages to Papadopoulos.

“For example, within a week of her initial March 24 meeting with him, Polonskaya attempted to send Papadopoulos a text message which email exchanges show to have been drafted or edited by Mifsud,” the report said.

....




Cliffs,

GP is approached, unsolicited, by Mifsud (who at very least has ties to western intelligence), Mifsud just totally happens to drop this “russia has Hillary dirt” in his lap.

Just a short time later, he is then approached, again, unsolicited, by Downer, who totally just happens to bring up this “dirt”.... odd...

Again, just a short time later, known spy Stefan Halper (who had already been dispatched to spy on members of the trump campaign) also contacts him, flys him in under false pretenses, and again, just happens to grill him about the same “dirt”.



Again, let’s recap.

Days after GP learns he’ll join Trump campaign, he’s baited by an fbi asset (unsolicited), and fed information.

Just a short time later, he is again (unsolicited) approached by a foreign government official, who just happens to bring up this information, and just happens to report the info back to the fbi, who just happen to open an investigation into the trump campaign.

Shortly after, he’s then approached by a known spy, Halper, and grilled again about the information.


But, GP totally wasn’t set up by the intelligence agencies of various countries all tying back to the obama administration.


<{cruzshake}>

I haven't had time to read Mueller's report yet, but you are claiming that Mifsud is an "FBI asset" now, because why, George P says so?

George also says he never lied to the FBI, despite him pleading guilty to lying to federal agents about his contacts with Kremlin-connected Russians, and he also says that his wife is one of those Italians with a Russian accent.

And again, you never answered my challenge: what was the Obama's deep state's profoundly convoluted and unsuccessful master plan, because I am having trouble connecting the dots on that one, and "please incorporate Rosenstein's role (you know the guy Trump appointed, and the GOP senate confirmed, who wasn't involved with the 2016 stuff but thought about wearing a wire to record Trump, and who appointed the special counsel to look at possible conspiracy between Russia and the Trump campaign, possible obstruction of justice, and also Trump possibly actually being a Russian asset). Smatter can't get the bat off your shoulder?

 

[Cake4Breakfast]

From the Mueller report and media analysis it sounds a lot like the Obama administration knew full well that Russian agents were attempting to influence the 2016 election but chose not to warn the Trump campaign or inform the American people. Instead, they attempted to use the information to their advantage politically by setting traps to entangle the Trump campaign in crimes and bring him down, sabotage his Presidency and so on.

Trump campaign officials were warned, but didn't go to the FBI because they wanted the help.

"In the weeks after he became the Republican nominee on July 19, 2016, Donald Trump was warned that foreign adversaries, including Russia, would probably try to spy on and infiltrate his campaign, according to multiple government officials familiar with the matter."

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...ans-would-try-infiltrate-his-campaign-n830596

Also, if you want to take a whack at the question no Trumpleforeskins on here will answer: "what was the Obama's deep state's profoundly convoluted and unsuccessful master plan...please incorporate Rosenstein's role (you know the guy Trump appointed, and the GOP senate confirmed, who wasn't involved with the 2016 stuff but thought about wearing a wire to record Trump, and who appointed the special counsel to look at possible conspiracy between Russia and the Trump campaign, possible obstruction of justice, and also Trump possibly actually being a Russian asset)?

 

[Cake4Breakfast]

Letter from Grassley to Barr, easier to read in link

https://www.grassley.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2019-04-25 CEG RJ to DOJ (Surveillance of Trump Transition Team).pdf



The Honorable William P. Barr Attorney General
U.S. Department ofJustice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530

Dear Attorney General Barr,
During your April 10, 2019, testimony before a Senate Appropriations Subcommittee, you stated that you are looking into the "genesis and conduct of intelligence activities directed at the Trump campaign during 2016."1 You further stated that "spying did occur," and that you believe it is your obligation to look into the question of whether surveillance activities by the Federal Bureau oflnvestigation (FBI) or other intelligence agencies were adequately predicated.
We share your concerns about these activities, and are troubled by the apparent unauthorized disclosures of surveillance efforts and other classified information during the same time period. We bring to your attention information that may assist your review.

First, in the course of our oversight work we have reviewed certain text messages that may show potential attempts by the FBI to conduct surveillance of President-elect Trump's transition team. In text messages exchanged between former FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok and former FBI Attorney Lisa Page, the two discussed the possibility ofdeveloping "potential relationships" at a November 2016 FBI briefing for presidential transition team staff.

Specifically, it appears they discussed sending "the CI guy" to assess an unnamed person(s) "demeanor" but were concerned because it might be unusual for him to attend. A few weeks after the presidential election, Mr. Strzok and Ms. Page discussed the logistics for the briefing. Mr. Strzok and Ms. Page said the following:
Strzok: Talking with Bill3. Do we want Joe4 to go with Evanina5 instead of Charlie6 for a variety of reasons?
Page: Hmm. Not sure. Would it be unusual to have [sic] show up again? Maybe another agent from the team?
1 Gregg Re and Brooke Singman, Dems rage against Barrfor backing claims ofTrump campaign 'spying' by FBl FoxNews (April 10, 2019). Available at https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dems-rage-against-barr-for-backing-claims-of-trump- campaign-spying-by-fbi; Nicholas Fandos and Adam Goldman, Barr Asserts Intelligence Agencies Spied on the Trump Campaign,

The New York Times (April 10, 2019). Available at https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/10/us/politics/barr-trump- campaign-spying.html; Philip Ewing, Citing 'Spying' On Trump, Barr Says He Is Looking Into Origins OfRussia Inquiry, NPR (April 10, 2019). Available at https://www.npr.org/2019/04/10/711852861 /citing-spying-on-trump-barr-says-he-s-looking-into- origins-of-russia-inquiry.
2 Id.
3 "Bill" most likely refers to E.W. Priestap, former Assistant Director of the FBI's counterintelligence division.
4 "Joe" most likely refers to Joe Pientka III, FBI Special Agent.
5 "Evanina" most likely refers to William R. Evanina, Director of the National Counterintelligence and Security Center. 6 At this time it is unknown who "Charlie" is.
2

Attorney General Barr April 25, 2019 Page 2 of3
Strzok: Or, he's "the CI guy." Same.might [sic] make sense. He can assess if thete [sic] are any news [sic] Qs, or different demeanor. IfKatie's husband is there, he can see if there are people we can develop for potential relationships
Page: Should I ask Andy7 about it? Or Bill8 want to reach out for andy9? Strzok: ItoldhimI'msurewecouldaskyoutomaketheswapifwethoughtit
10
The nature of these communications, and the precise purpose of any attempts to "develop relationships"withTrumporPencetransitionteamstaffarenotimmediatelyclear. Werethese efforts done to gain better communication between the respective parties, or were the briefings used as intelligence gathering operations? Further, did any such surveillance activities continue beyond the inauguration, and in the event they did, were those activities subject to proper predication? Any improper FBI surveillance activities that were conducted before or after the 2016 election must be brought to light and properly addressed.
Additionally, we note that a number of news outlets have reported sensitive information related to the investigation into alleged Russian collusion with the Trump campaign. Those reports have revealed sensitive information focusing on the FBI sending informants to meet with Trump advisors; a warrant to surveil Carter Page; and the United Kingdom signal intelligence agency briefing former CIA Director John Brennan on alleged communications between Trump's campaign and Russian officials, among other things. 11 Notably, the Justice Department Inspector General's review ofthe Clinton investigation found "profound concerns about the volume and extent ofunauthorized media contacts by FBI personnel..."12 It appears the same happened during the Russia investigation. Leaks to the media about ongoing investigations undermine the ability ofinvestigators to properly investigate. Moreover, sensitive leaks to the media while members of congress performing constitutionally mandated oversight are kept in the dark is unacceptable.13
Accordingly, please contact our staffto schedule a briefing and answer the following no later than May 9, 2019:
7 "Andy" most likely refers to Andrew McCabe, former Deputy Director of the FBI.
8 "Bill" most likely refers to E.W. Priestap, former Assistant Director ofthe FBI's counterintelligence division.
9 "Andy" most likely refers to Andrew McCabe, former Deputy Director ofthe FBI.
10 November 17, 2016, Strzok-Page Texts Part 2, p. 159, DOJ-PROD-0000325. Emphasis added.
11 Eli Lake, Focus on the Leaking, Not Just the Spying, Bloomberg Opinion (April 11, 2019). Available at
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-04-l l/spying-did-occur-but-barr-should-also-focus-on-the-leaking.
12 A Review ofVarious Actions by the Federal Bureau oflnvestigation and Department ofJustice in Advance ofthe 2016
Election at 429 (June 14, 2018). Available at https://www.justice.gov/file/l 071991/download.
13
For example, former Deputy Director McCabe was fired for making unauthorized disclosures to the media regarding the FBI's investigation into the Clinton Foundation and then lying about it. In addition, transcripts of former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn's phone calls with Russian Ambassador to the U.S., Sergey Kislyak, were leaked. On February 15, 2017, the Judiciary Committee requested information from the Justice Department and FBI relating to that leaked information. On March 15, 2017, the FBI provided a briefing about the FBI's Russia investigation which answered a few ofthe questions posed by the Committee, but most were not.
was smart. It's not until Mon so Bill can always discuss with him tomorrow.

Attorney General Barr April 25, 2019 Page 3 of3
1. Please describe the nature and extent o f your review o f FBI surveillance o f the Trump Campaign, President-elect Trump's transition staff, Vice President- elect Pence's transition staff, President Trump's staff, and Vice President Pence's staff, including your efforts to determine whether that surveillance was adequately predicated.
2. How many counter-intelligence briefings were provided to the Trump and Pence transition staffs prior to Inauguration Day? Please list the dates, all agencies involved, and each official that represented those agencies at the briefings.
3. Many of the FBI employees involved in these activities are no longer employed by the federal government. How will your review obtain information needed from these individuals?
4. Will you commit to providing the results of your review once completed?
5. What steps have you taken to investigate whether DOJ or FBI officials had
unauthorized contacts with the media during the Russia investigation?
We anticipate that your written reply and most responsive documents will be unclassified. Please send all unclassified material directly to each Committee. In keeping with the requirements of Executive Order 13526, if any of the responsive documents do contain classified information, please segregate all unclassified material within the classified documents, provide all unclassified information directly to each Committee, and provide a classified addendum to the Office of Senate Security. Although our Committees comply with all laws and regulations governing the handling of classified information, they are not bound, absent prior agreement, by any handling restrictions.
Should you have any questions, please contact Joshua Flynn-BrowrI of Chairman Grassley's Finance Committee staff at (202) 224-4515 or Brian Dowriey of Chairman Johnson's Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee staff at (202) 224-4751.
~Ji_~
Charles E. Grassley Chairman
Senate Finance Committee
ommittee on Homeland and Governmental Affairs
Sincerely,

...........





Just out today.

History will not reflect kindly on the Obama administration.

Uh oh, and Grassley got Ron "there's a secret society" Johnson on board too!

notice how they quoted the thing Barr said about how "spying occured" before Barr hemmed and hawed when asked a direct question about this and gave the "Um, did you say that I said that it occurred?" " I just want to make it clear, thinking back on all the different colloquies here, that I am not saying that improper surveillance occurred,” Barr offered at the close of the hearing. “I am saying I am concerned about it and looking into it, that’s all.”

Political shills gonna shill Bob.

 

[Wingslaught]

Trump campaign officials were warned, but didn't go to the FBI because they wanted the help.

"In the weeks after he became the Republican nominee on July 19, 2016, Donald Trump was warned that foreign adversaries, including Russia, would probably try to spy on and infiltrate his campaign, according to multiple government officials familiar with the matter."

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...ans-would-try-infiltrate-his-campaign-n830596

From the article:

Montoya and other former FBI officials told NBC News the FBI would not have wanted to compromise that investigation by saying too much in the counterintelligence briefing of Trump.

The FBI was already investigating Trump's campaign for potential collusion before briefing him of the threat of foreign adversaries meddling in the election. Also, it sounds as though it was a standard briefing given to all incoming party nominees that was not related to all the Russian activities outlined in the Mueller report.

Rosenstein relates in the below video that the Obama DOJ chose not to publish the full story on Russian interference in the election prior to his arrival. A decision he clearly disagrees with at this point.

Also, if you want to take a whack at the question no Trumpleforeskins on here will answer: "what was the Obama's deep state's profoundly convoluted and unsuccessful master plan...please incorporate Rosenstein's role (you know the guy Trump appointed, and the GOP senate confirmed, who wasn't involved with the 2016 stuff but thought about wearing a wire to record Trump, and who appointed the special counsel to look at possible conspiracy between Russia and the Trump campaign, possible obstruction of justice, and also Trump possibly actually being a Russian asset)?

I don't understand the question. Isn't it obvious? To destroy or undo Trump's Presidency one way or another. FBI officials are on record admitting that they held meetings about the 25th Amendment which can be used to remove a President from office.

“There were meetings at the Justice Department at which it was discussed whether the vice president and a majority of the Cabinet could be brought together to remove the president of the United States under the 25th Amendment,” Pelley said Thursday. “And the highest levels of American law enforcement were trying to figure out what to do with the president.”

https://thehill.com/homenews/admini...-discussed-25th-amendment-confirms-rosenstein

 

[Timmahhhh]

Don’t engage in illegal activities and you don’t have to worried about being investigated.

It would be nice if that were true.

 

[Darkballs]

Thats a pretty embarrassing post. If you want to fish for someone to get banned, at least have some pride and do it in a private message.

I don't think bob should be banned. I think the mods should be stricter on what is clear shitposting/trolling.

And I'm not sure why you think I should slam someone behind their back, in secret in a PM. I'd rather just call it like I see it.

 

[bobgeese]

I haven't had time to read Mueller's report yet, but you are claiming that Mifsud is an "FBI asset" now, because why, George P says so?

George also says he never lied to the FBI, despite him pleading guilty to lying to federal agents about his contacts with Kremlin-connected Russians, and he also says that his wife is one of those Italians with a Russian accent.

And again, you never answered my challenge: what was the Obama's deep state's profoundly convoluted and unsuccessful master plan, because I am having trouble connecting the dots on that one, and "please incorporate Rosenstein's role (you know the guy Trump appointed, and the GOP senate confirmed, who wasn't involved with the 2016 stuff but thought about wearing a wire to record Trump, and who appointed the special counsel to look at possible conspiracy between Russia and the Trump campaign, possible obstruction of justice, and also Trump possibly actually being a Russian asset). Smatter can't get the bat off your shoulder?

Cake, if you’re asking some of this stuff, you need to catch up with the news of the last couple weeks.

Mifsud, was just outed from hiding by an Italian newspaper. You’ll need to read the whole thing, but suffice to say, he now has far more ties to western intelligence, than the kremlin.

Rosenstien, I’m not sure what you’re implying here. I’ve rarely if ever criticized Rosenstien, even when the “wearing a wire” story broke.


....


To your point (that for some reason you think is good, or clever) about Obama.

Um, hello Cake, even before trump, Barry Osoeto had been caught spying multiple times. Shit, how many times on his homegirl Angela Merkel alone?

Obama was literally looking at his arch enemy being elected to replace him. In Obama’s own words, the election was a referendum on him and his presidency. Furthermore, as you’re likely aware the president following him would end up changing the courts for a generation with all the appointments needed, not to mention the Supreme Court.

It’s not like this was some massive undertaking that was impossible to conceive. It literally consisted of a handful of people at the fbi, the DOJ (who have already been caught breaking protocol), and some old assets and foreign politicians who owed Hillary a favor.

FFS man, we already know all the people, they’ve already been fired, demoted, or forced to resign in disgrace. They’ve already thrown each other under the bus to save their own assess. Every week a new little detail emerges, it won’t be long until the entire picture of what happened is on display.

........


Now, I would like a one topic, specific reply to this question.


Mifsud, a man with ties to western intelligence, who’s been in hiding since this news broke (being paid for and sheltered by a group that literally trains these assets), approaches GP unsolicited, who then feeds him this “Russian information”.

GP is then approached by Downer, again unsolicited. This conversation just also happens to be the excuse for which the whole investigation was started.

Then, just a bit later, GP is again approached under false pretenses by the known spy Stefan Halper, who grills him about the conversation with Downer. And a reminder, Halper had already been dispatched to spy on the trump campaign, and had already been in contact with multiple trump campaign officials (so there goes your page theory).


So cake, GP finds out he will work on the trump campaign. Less than 2 weeks later he’s approached unsolicited by a US intelligence asset who feeds him controversial info. Two weeks later, he’s approached again unsolicited, by a foreign diplomat close to the Clintons, who then just happens to take that conversation back to us intelligence, to use as premise for an investigation into the trump campaign. Oh, and then GP is approached a third time, again unsolicited, this time he’s grilled over the same information by a guy who’s already been caught spying on presidential campaigns.


Exactly what part of the above is a coincidence?

 

[Cake4Breakfast]

I don't understand the question. Isn't it obvious? To destroy or undo Trump's Presidency one way or another. FBI officials are on record admitting that they held meetings about the 25th Amendment which can be used to remove a President from office.

You do understand the question: why would they cook up a witch hunt investigation and then not leak it to the press before the election, you know, when it could have kept Trump from being president? That's kind of the whole point, no?

And it was Rosenstein who brought up wearing a wire in his interactions with Trump, it was him talking about the 25th Amendment and it was him doing the straw poll of cabinet members who would sign on, and it was him who wanted to know what Comey thought he should do after he heard Trump tell the Russians that firing Comey relieved great pressure and Rosenstein realized that he had been played as Trump's patsy for firing Comey in the first place.

 

[Cake4Breakfast]

Cake, if you’re asking some of this stuff, you need to catch up with the news of the last couple weeks.

Mifsud, was just outed from hiding by an Italian newspaper. You’ll need to read the whole thing, but suffice to say, he now has far more ties to western intelligence, than the kremlin.

Rosenstien, I’m not sure what you’re implying here. I’ve rarely if ever criticized Rosenstien, even when the “wearing a wire” story broke.


....


To your point (that for some reason you think is good, or clever) about Obama.

Um, hello Cake, even before trump, Barry Osoeto had been caught spying multiple times. Shit, how many times on his homegirl Angela Merkel alone?

Obama was literally looking at his arch enemy being elected to replace him. In Obama’s own words, the election was a referendum on him and his presidency. Furthermore, as you’re likely aware the president following him would end up changing the courts for a generation with all the appointments needed, not to mention the Supreme Court.

It’s not like this was some massive undertaking that was impossible to conceive. It literally consisted of a handful of people at the fbi, the DOJ (who have already been caught breaking protocol), and some old assets and foreign politicians who owed Hillary a favor.

FFS man, we already know all the people, they’ve already been fired, demoted, or forced to resign in disgrace. They’ve already thrown each other under the bus to save their own assess. Every week a new little detail emerges, it won’t be long until the entire picture of what happened is on display.

........


Now, I would like a one topic, specific reply to this question.


Mifsud, a man with ties to western intelligence, who’s been in hiding since this news broke (being paid for and sheltered by a group that literally trains these assets), approaches GP unsolicited, who then feeds him this “Russian information”.

GP is then approached by Downer, again unsolicited. This conversation just also happens to be the excuse for which the whole investigation was started.

Then, just a bit later, GP is again approached under false pretenses by the known spy Stefan Halper, who grills him about the conversation with Downer. And a reminder, Halper had already been dispatched to spy on the trump campaign, and had already been in contact with multiple trump campaign officials (so there goes your page theory).


So cake, GP finds out he will work on the trump campaign. Less than 2 weeks later he’s approached unsolicited by a US intelligence asset who feeds him controversial info. Two weeks later, he’s approached again unsolicited, by a foreign diplomat close to the Clintons, who then just happens to take that conversation back to us intelligence, to use as premise for an investigation into the trump campaign. Oh, and then GP is approached a third time, again unsolicited, this time he’s grilled over the same information by a guy who’s already been caught spying on presidential campaigns.


Exactly what part of the above is a coincidence?

1. please link to a legitimate article about Mifsud to back up your point, I have searched google and found nothing, outside of what George P is saying.

2. Your rambling answer about Obama's legacy doesn't touch my actual question. beyond all of the improbable drama with Comey and Rosenstein figuring into your deep state coup theory, not to mention all of Trump's obstruction, let's start with why didn't anyone leak it after they went to all of that trouble? why undertake all that effort, and risk, to load the cannon and then not fire it? I mean that Grassley letter you posted was all about leaks to the media undermining investigations, and nothing was leaked about Crossfire Hurricane, yet the whole thing was a figment of the deep state's imagination conjured up specifically as insurance to keep Trump from being elected?
<puh-lease75>

3. Yes, as we went over before talking about Ohr, people have been demoted, but not officially for having to do with anything connected to Trump, so that doesn't support your point, as if there was something they could officially be nailed for, they would have been nailed. Even the drama Trump cooked up with firing Mccabe was about McCabe leaking something damaging to Killary. When someone is actually penalized for something having to do with your deep state conspiracy, then you might have some actual evidence to back up your theory.

4. Why do you keep taking what George P says as factual history, the guy is a creepy little sleazeball, and is a convicted felon, and he hasn't even kept his story straight on his lying to the FBI, and Papadopoulos’s lies to investigators “undermined investigators’ ability to challenge Mifsud” during the interview, according to the report.

 

[Cake4Breakfast]

My god, Al Bundy is a legend.



Peggy could definitely get it too.



18+ Kelly...

 

[bobgeese]

1. please link to a legitimate article about Mifsud to back up your point, I have searched google and found nothing, outside of what George P is saying.

2. Your rambling answer about Obama's legacy doesn't touch my actual question. beyond all of the improbable drama with Comey and Rosenstein figuring into your deep state coup theory, not to mention all of Trump's obstruction, let's start with why didn't anyone leak it after they went to all of that trouble? why undertake all that effort, and risk, to load the cannon and then not fire it? I mean that Grassley letter you posted was all about leaks to the media undermining investigations, and nothing was leaked about Crossfire Hurricane, yet the whole thing was a figment of the deep state's imagination conjured up specifically as insurance to keep Trump from being elected?
<puh-lease75>

3. Yes, as we went over before talking about Ohr, people have been demoted, but not officially for having to do with anything connected to Trump, so that doesn't support your point, as if there was something they could officially be nailed for, they would have been nailed. Even the drama Trump cooked up with firing Mccabe was about McCabe leaking something damaging to Killary. When someone is actually penalized for something having to do with your deep state conspiracy, then you might have some actual evidence to back up your theory.

4. Why do you keep taking what George P says as factual history, the guy is a creepy little sleazeball, and is a convicted felon, and he hasn't even kept his story straight on his lying to the FBI, and Papadopoulos’s lies to investigators “undermined investigators’ ability to challenge Mifsud” during the interview, according to the report.

Check the last two pages FFS.


I have no interest in addressing whatever it is you’re attempting to spin about Rosenstien and Comey. Everything I’ve stated is backed up with sources, and you’re unwilling to address it directly.


The Trump campaign was spied on.

It is known.

 

[Cake4Breakfast]

Check the last two pages FFS.


I have no interest in addressing whatever it is you’re attempting to spin about Rosenstien and Comey. Everything I’ve stated is backed up with sources, and you’re unwilling to address it directly.


The Trump campaign was spied on.

It is known.

1. just post the source
2. i am spinning nothing, you are dodging a simple question, again.
3. And nothing available publicly (or privately to AG Barr as of his last testimony) supports that the Trump campaign was spied on, hence Barr pulling a Steve Urkel, blathering about "colloquies", and power walking his spying allegations back when challenged with his own words.

 

[calavera2]

Why wouldn't you spy on the Trump campaign?

 

[bobgeese]

1. just post the source
2. i am spinning nothing, you are dodging a simple question, again.
3. And nothing available publicly (or privately to AG Barr as of his last testimony) supports that the Trump campaign was spied on, hence Barr pulling a Steve Urkel, blathering about "colloquies", and power walking his spying allegations back when challenged with his own words.

With regard to Barr, I’m not sure why you make a big deal out of rephrasing spying. Unauthorized surveillance or whatever the hell they settled on, is still spying. Sending who got caught spying on a presidential campaign, to make contact with at least 3 members of the trump campaign, is still spying.

Then a couple weeks after GP joins the trump campaign, he appears to have been fed information by someone who has connections to western intelligence, (has been in hiding for a year, and Meullers report states he lied to them), then again unsolicited, is approached, the conversation relayed back to the us as an excuse to open an investigation they’ve already dispatched Halper, you know, the spy on.


All just a day at the office for the fbi/DOJ/etc under Obama. At least according to cake.


<{cruzshake}>

 

[Cake4Breakfast]

With regard to Barr, I’m not sure why you make a big deal out of rephrasing spying. Unauthorized surveillance or whatever the hell they settled on, is still spying. Sending who got caught spying on a presidential campaign, to make contact with at least 3 members of the trump campaign, is still spying.

Then a couple weeks after GP joins the trump campaign, he appears to have been fed information by someone who has connections to western intelligence, (has been in hiding for a year, and Meullers report states he lied to them), then again unsolicited, is approached, the conversation relayed back to the us as an excuse to open an investigation they’ve already dispatched Halper, you know, the spy on.


All just a day at the office for the fbi/DOJ/etc under Obama. At least according to cake.


<{cruzshake}>

1. In regard to Barr, look at what he said when challenged: "I just want to make it clear... that I am not saying that improper surveillance occurred."

2. You have not provided a source to back up your assertion that Mifsud is an "FBI asset". And, you are consistently relying on a convicted lying felon, a lying felon whose felonious lies “undermined investigators’ ability to challenge Mifsud” during the interview, according to the report.

3. You are still unable to give a battle plan for your labyrinthine theory about the deep state's attempts to help Killary. Start with the fact that we know that Russia illegally interfered in the election in multiple ways, and that we know that team Trump did a lot of shady and concerning things in regard to their interactions with Russia agents, and then lied about those behaviors every chance they got... I know this is crazy Bob, but maybe the FBI and US intel was just doing its job, because they knew Russia was up to no good (and if you look at guys like Strzok and Ohr, their specialty has been Russia and Russian organized crime) and were looking at the liability and vulnerability of some of the weird fuckers on the Trump campaign. And because that was their focus (as opposed to helping Killary with a fake investigation started for the purposes of helping her beat Trump) they didn't leak the existence of the investigation for the purposes of helping Killary beat Trump.

 

[bobgeese]

1. In regard to Barr, look at what he said when challenged: "I just want to make it clear... that I am not saying that improper surveillance occurred."

2. You have not provided a source to back up your assertion that Mifsud is an "FBI asset". And, you are consistently relying on a convicted lying felon, a lying felon whose felonious lies “undermined investigators’ ability to challenge Mifsud” during the interview, according to the report.

3. You are still unable to give a battle plan for your labyrinthine theory about the deep state's attempts to help Killary. Start with the fact that we know that Russia illegally interfered in the election in multiple ways, and that we know that team Trump did a lot of shady and concerning things in regard to their interactions with Russia agents, and then lied about those behaviors every chance they got... I know this is crazy Bob, but maybe the FBI and US intel was just doing its job, because they knew Russia was up to no good (and if you look at guys like Strzok and Ohr, their specialty has been Russia and Russian organized crime) and were looking at the liability and vulnerability of some of the weird fuckers on the Trump campaign. And because that was their focus (as opposed to helping Killary with a fake investigation started for the purposes of helping her beat Trump) they didn't leak the existence of the investigation for the purposes of helping Killary beat Trump.

Jesus man, maybe if you bothered to read the thread, you wouldn’t be so uninformed.


From Fox,

The most fishy parts of the story are: Is Mifsud really a Russian agent?” former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy said Monday on “Fox and Friends.”

“No evidence has been presented to support the claim,” investigative journalist Lee Smith also wrote in a lengthy story about Mifsud for RealClearInvestigations. “Although Mifsud has traveled many times to Russia and has contacts with Russian academics, his closest public ties are to Western governments, politicians, and institutions, including the CIA, FBI and British intelligence services.”


“Mifsud also had Western ties at academic institutions like the Link Campus University in Rome, the University of Stirling in Scotland, the London Academy of Diplomacy and the London Center for International Law Practice







Hmm, I wonder where Mifsud has been hiding for the last year?

Oh, link Campus.


Because, western intelligence allies hide secret Russian assets all the time...