Is anyone actually impartial anymore? I'm a brit and therefore will probably be accused of nut hugigng for even mentioning Joe but I don't care. Many said Lacy would mess Joe up, didn't happen. Then he goes and fights a guy younger, stronger, ranked as no two behind him and wins convincingly. Then he lands the most punches anyone has on BHop (I think). And still people poke fun at him and say he needs to fight this guy or that guy. Why not just be honest and say I don't like the guy? Look its easy I don't like Bernard Hopkins because of his stupid white boy comment and constantly going on about where he came from. He's loaded now and WE KNOW he was in jail. Its a good story but we don't need it on repeat... Its like when guys below a fighter, Froch is a good example in this case, claim the main man is avoiding them. Actually it is just unfortunate for Froch he'll always be behind Joe, its just timing. Like if Amir Khan thinks he can take Hatton the timing is wrong, nobodies fault, no big deal. This doesn't just have to be about Joe, what is it about a certain fighter that makes YOU think no matter what he does "I'm not impressed".