• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Crime Should we shoot down the UFOs in New Jersey?

The US government says radioactive material was lost in New Jersey. It arrived in a crate that was damaged and the material was missing!!

This New Jersey mayor says it's still a major problem that the government is lying to us, but that he thinks that's what the drones are about.

Problems with this notion are that the drones are only flying at night and why would they stop looking during the day?

Problems with this are why would the drones be looking in military airports and shutting them down? And why would the drones shut down an international airport? And why would a drone fly 6 ft under a senator's helicopter causing them to land?...

There's a top secret Congressional meeting taking place about the situation, but the Mayors are not privy to it.

@Rob Battisti

@Sakuraba'sEar Ear

@N13






So not a nuke, but radioactive material. I wander which kind of material? Regardless, radioactive particles are enough to kill people, depending on how it's introduced.

Alpha, beta, and gamma particles all affect differently. Gamma being the worst for people
 
I don't think it's the govts job to tell everyone everything
giphy.gif
 
How do you know this? And how do you know what kind of radioactive materials were stolen?
THIS MATERIAL EVENT CONTAINS A 'Less than Cat 3' LEVEL OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL

Sources that are "Less than IAEA Category 3 sources," are either sources that are very unlikely to cause permanent injury to individuals or contain a very small amount of radioactive material that would not cause any permanent injury. Some of these sources, such as moisture density gauges or thickness gauges that are Category 4, the amount of unshielded radioactive material, if not safely managed or securely protected, could possibly - although it is unlikely - temporarily injure someone who handled it or were otherwise in contact with it, or who were close to it for a period of many weeks.
 
The US government says radioactive material was lost in New Jersey. It arrived in a crate that was damaged and the material was missing!!

This New Jersey mayor says it's still a major problem that the government is lying to us, but that he thinks that's what the drones are about.

Problems with this notion are that the drones are only flying at night and why would they stop looking during the day?

Problems with this are why would the drones be looking in military airports and shutting them down? And why would the drones shut down an international airport? And why would a drone fly 6 ft under a senator's helicopter causing them to land?...

There's a top secret Congressional meeting taking place about the situation, but the Mayors are not privy to it.

@Rob Battisti

@Sakuraba'sEar Ear

@N13
@Zer









Even if that's true - and I wouldn't bet my own money on it - it doesn't explain the drone swarms over American bases in the UK and Germany.

And if they're looking for radioactive material, why aren't they searching 24/7 instead of just at night?
 
THIS MATERIAL EVENT CONTAINS A 'Less than Cat 3' LEVEL OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL

Sources that are "Less than IAEA Category 3 sources," are either sources that are very unlikely to cause permanent injury to individuals or contain a very small amount of radioactive material that would not cause any permanent injury. Some of these sources, such as moisture density gauges or thickness gauges that are Category 4, the amount of unshielded radioactive material, if not safely managed or securely protected, could possibly - although it is unlikely - temporarily injure someone who handled it or were otherwise in contact with it, or who were close to it for a period of many weeks.
If this is true, let's put aside the radioactive material idea. It would have to substantial enough to warrant this kind of goverment response


Nonetheless, I'll add it to the list
 
How do you account for the different kinds of orbs some having no propellers making no sound and leaving no trails that seem to be just bright lights in the sky and that can disappear at will?

How do you account for a car size drone flying under a senator's helicopter 6 ft below causing so much panic for the pilot that they landed their plane immediately for fear?

How do you account for those drones closing down a national airport?


How do you account for them closing down a military installation?

@chardog Don't miss this reply man. I'm very curious what you think about this.
like I said, I havent paid much attention to the story, but the fact that these are all done at night tells me that they dont want these devices to be seen, hence the various depictions are sketchy. drones wont appear to make sounds if far enough (especially in noisy environments), and it's at night, turning off lights will make it "disappear". not going to address the rest other than "rules for thee not for me" is essentially government SOP.
 
Stolen Nuke Theory
Its a Psyop Theory
China Theory
Drones Vs Intergalactic Plasmids Theory
CERN accidently opened a gate to hell Theory
Cartel Theory
Training exercise/system test theory.
Hoax theory
AI controlled Drones (like skynet) Theory
Santa's Drones Theory
+ Lost radioactive material Theory
 
Everyone should watch this video. It's the most important one I've seen. This guy thinks it's a foreign Nation and that we are risk of going to war with China probably.

 
Whatever it is, it's becoming evident they are just lying about it.

And whats up with the Orbs?

Is the purpose of this psyop to irritate everyone? Mission accomplished Kirby!
Yeah I don't know much about the orbs other than talk. I've heard the drones don't have heat signatures, but what about the orbs?
 
Right now it seems like the most logically coherent explanation is that it is our government and they are doing psyops to see how we will react to drones in a perceived drone attack or illegal drone scenario that sometimes breaks laws and causes disruptions to airports and military bases and private helicopters.

As I type that out it kind of strains credulity a little bit but so does every other explanation I've heard so far.


The data that is left out and ignored for this scenario is that there are orbs that appear to be unmanned and not of human origin that are also being cited alongside of these.

Gosh, I started this post to give my opinion of what I think is the most likely, but I can't say it with a straight face..... but every other explanation seems to fall apart also.

Every single explanation that I've heard on the forums minimizes certain pieces of data or ignores them completely while emphasizing others. I've not heard a single coherent explanation given in this thread by me or anyone else that includes all of the data and takes it all seriously.

Honestly, the theory that makes the most sense of all the data if you want to include all of the data is that there are extraterrestrial UFOs (or exotic technologies unconnected to our known technological history) flying all over New Jersey and that the government is either obfuscating that fact by flying tons of drones at the same time or trying to study those with drones at the same time.

No way am I saying that's the case but it does seem to be the one explanation that takes in all of the data without excluding pieces of information that don't fit a certain theory.
9NHL.gif


Slow down Gramps…
 
THIS MATERIAL EVENT CONTAINS A 'Less than Cat 3' LEVEL OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL

Sources that are "Less than IAEA Category 3 sources," are either sources that are very unlikely to cause permanent injury to individuals or contain a very small amount of radioactive material that would not cause any permanent injury. Some of these sources, such as moisture density gauges or thickness gauges that are Category 4, the amount of unshielded radioactive material, if not safely managed or securely protected, could possibly - although it is unlikely - temporarily injure someone who handled it or were otherwise in contact with it, or who were close to it for a period of many weeks.

The missing radioactive material is part of a PET scanner with 0.267 mCI
 
Back
Top