You're constantly called out on here for not understanding anybody's position. You argue with everybody and call them all liars. You're unclear, all over the place and just spit out the first idea that pops into your head on almost every topic.
You're entertaining, if nothing else. Like punching bag is entertaining.
Let me know when it's time to catch a ride with Bigfoot and Jebus through the wormhole over NJ!
What you've done is not read a single post I've made and only skimmed and then assumed which is really dumb.
here is the original post you quoted claiming I am forming definitive conclusions. try reading the whole post.
Right now it seems like the most logically coherent explanation is that it is our government and they are doing psyops to see how we will react to drones in a perceived drone attack or illegal drone scenario that sometimes breaks laws and causes disruptions to airports and military bases and private helicopters.
As I type that out it kind of strains credulity a little bit but so does every other explanation I've heard so far.
The data that is left out and ignored for this scenario is that there are orbs that appear to be unmanned and not of human origin that are also being cited alongside of these.
Gosh, I started this post to give my opinion of what I think is the most likely, but I can't say it with a straight face..... but every other explanation seems to fall apart also.
Every single explanation that I've heard on the forums minimizes certain pieces of data or ignores them completely while emphasizing others. I've not heard a single coherent explanation given in this thread by me or anyone else that includes all of the data and takes it all seriously.
Honestly, the theory that makes the most sense of all the data if you want to include all of the data is that there are extraterrestrial UFOs (or exotic technologies unconnected to our known technological history) flying all over New Jersey and that the government is either obfuscating that fact by flying tons of drones at the same time or trying to study those with drones at the same time.
No way am I saying that's the case but it does seem to be the one explanation that takes in all of the data without excluding pieces of information that don't fit a certain theory.