• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Crime Should we shoot down the UFOs in New Jersey?

Yes. This is pointing out how it's a nothing burger so terrapin can quit flipping his lid about it and move to the next theory.
Yeah, was just adding the more precise context.

And for perspective, everyone is absorbing radiation all the time, about 2-3 mSv per year.

With this device in the room with you, you would get an extra few days worth of radiation.

Nothing to worry about and certainly nothing that could be detected via aerial drone.
 
an air balloon? how about bullets?
It was 200 feet in size and an altitude that made it ineffective to shoot bullets. They used a missile to ensure safety and accuracy. A plane would also have to have been dangerously close to use bullets at that altitude. Anything that could have triggered a slow deflation could have also caused complications such as the balloon returning to land during decent. The gov didn't make any announcement other than to say there was no indication the balloon was sending or receiving information signals during its course. The most acceptable scenario was that it was a Chinese device for monitoring weather conditions around Hawaii which had been blown off course. The USA even stated they were aware of it and had been tracking it long before the public and media found out. They likely didn't release a statement because they would have to admit there was a general over reaction triggered by hysteria ... which is likely what is happening again here. The airline authorities have already responded stating many of the sightings are just normal air traffic.
 
But it wasn't the opposite. I'm not a theist.

You described yourself as a 'hardcore athiest' once. To now using verbiage like satanic, reptilian and nazis in antarctica. These are conspiracies formulated and propagated from religious cults.
 
  • Like
Reactions: N13
Difference between you and I is that I wait till information arrives. You’re a speculative nutjob that blurts out the dumbest shit and illogical ideas one could come up with, right away, with the utmost zeal!
No, the difference between you and I is that I like to talk about it from all angles and consider every angle without make a conclusion. And you like to make fun of people for thinking about it without making a conclusion.

Also, I can read people's positions and understand them and you can't because you just criticized me for the exact opposite of what I'm doing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I personally think all this hysteria about the drones is the cost of people losing trust in the system.
That's definitely a really big part of this is that the Biden administration is lying about it and said they didn't know what it was which is b******* they certainly have to know. They're telling us they know what it is but that it's all people's personal drones. Just coincidentally all of a sudden flying them all at the same time in New Jersey. 6 foot drones.. privately owned.. all a coincidence... lol

When asked, what about the drones invading illegal airspace? They said that's a different matter altogether and then moved on.
 
No, the difference between you and I is that I like to talk about it from all angles and consider every angle without make a conclusion. And you like to make fun of people for thinking about it without making a conclusion.

Also, I can read people's positions and understand them and you can't because you just criticized me in the exact opposite of what I'm doing.
You're constantly called out on here for not understanding anybody's position. You argue with everybody and call them all liars. You're unclear, all over the place and just spit out the first idea that pops into your head on almost every topic.

You're entertaining, if nothing else. Like punching bag is entertaining.

Let me know when it's time to catch a ride with Bigfoot and Jebus through the wormhole over NJ!
 
- Drones are poking fun at your guys cost.

Millions of guns in the US, and a couple of car sized drones can do what they want?
 
You're constantly called out on here for not understanding anybody's position. You argue with everybody and call them all liars. You're unclear, all over the place and just spit out the first idea that pops into your head on almost every topic.

You're entertaining, if nothing else. Like punching bag is entertaining.

Let me know when it's time to catch a ride with Bigfoot and Jebus through the wormhole over NJ!

What you've done is not read a single post I've made and only skimmed and then assumed which is really dumb.



here is the original post you quoted claiming I am forming definitive conclusions. try reading the whole post.

Right now it seems like the most logically coherent explanation is that it is our government and they are doing psyops to see how we will react to drones in a perceived drone attack or illegal drone scenario that sometimes breaks laws and causes disruptions to airports and military bases and private helicopters.

As I type that out it kind of strains credulity a little bit but so does every other explanation I've heard so far.


The data that is left out and ignored for this scenario is that there are orbs that appear to be unmanned and not of human origin that are also being cited alongside of these.

Gosh, I started this post to give my opinion of what I think is the most likely, but I can't say it with a straight face..... but every other explanation seems to fall apart also.

Every single explanation that I've heard on the forums minimizes certain pieces of data or ignores them completely while emphasizing others. I've not heard a single coherent explanation given in this thread by me or anyone else that includes all of the data and takes it all seriously.

Honestly, the theory that makes the most sense of all the data if you want to include all of the data is that there are extraterrestrial UFOs (or exotic technologies unconnected to our known technological history) flying all over New Jersey and that the government is either obfuscating that fact by flying tons of drones at the same time or trying to study those with drones at the same time.

No way am I saying that's the case but it does seem to be the one explanation that takes in all of the data without excluding pieces of information that don't fit a certain theory.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
like I said, I havent paid much attention to the story, but the fact that these are all done at night tells me that they dont want these devices to be seen, hence the various depictions are sketchy. drones wont appear to make sounds if far enough (especially in noisy environments), and it's at night, turning off lights will make it "disappear". not going to address the rest other than "rules for thee not for me" is essentially government SOP.
The problem with this position is that if they don't want them to be seen, why are all their lights on?? All of the drones have been lit up like a Christmas tree so that kind of excludes the motivation of stealth doesn't it??
 
What you've done is not read a single post I've made and only skimmed and then assumed which is really dumb.



here is the original post you quoted claiming I am forming definitive conclusions. try reading the whole post.

Right now it seems like the most logically coherent explanation is that it is our government and they are doing psyops to see how we will react to drones in a perceived drone attack or illegal drone scenario that sometimes breaks laws and causes disruptions to airports and military bases and private helicopters.

As I type that out it kind of strains credulity a little bit but so does every other explanation I've heard so far.


The data that is left out and ignored for this scenario is that there are orbs that appear to be unmanned and not of human origin that are also being cited alongside of these.

Gosh, I started this post to give my opinion of what I think is the most likely, but I can't say it with a straight face..... but every other explanation seems to fall apart also.

Every single explanation that I've heard on the forums minimizes certain pieces of data or ignores them completely while emphasizing others. I've not heard a single coherent explanation given in this thread by me or anyone else that includes all of the data and takes it all seriously.

Honestly, the theory that makes the most sense of all the data if you want to include all of the data is that there are extraterrestrial UFOs (or exotic technologies unconnected to our known technological history) flying all over New Jersey and that the government is either obfuscating that fact by flying tons of drones at the same time or trying to study those with drones at the same time.

No way am I saying that's the case but it does seem to be the one explanation that takes in all of the data without excluding pieces of information that don't fit a certain theory.
Look at you go.

<36>
 
dod statement about drones. Same talking point. Nothing is happening out of the ordinary.

 
they're fucking lying SEND MORE DRONES TO CHECK!!!!!!!!!!!

“Having closely examined the technical data and tips from concerned citizens, we assess that the sightings to date include a combination of lawful commercial drones, hobbyist drones, and law enforcement drones, as well as manned fixed-wing aircraft, helicopters, and stars mistakenly reported as drones,” the federal agencies said.
 
If it was just a pet scanner with a tiny amount of radiation, they would've said so on day 1. The fact that they're pretending to either not know about it or pretending to be stupid should send some fucking alarms

If Trump has been President all this time, all the people playing it down in this thread would be drumming up the stolen nuke theory
 
If it was just a pet scanner with a tiny amount of radiation, they would've said so on day 1. The fact that they're pretending to either not know about it or pretending to be stupid should send some fucking alarms

If Trump has been President all this time, all the people playing it down in this thread would be drumming up the stolen nuke theory
Where are you getting this? I'm curious.
 
Back
Top