• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Sherdog POTWR: Round 4: The General Election

2016 Sherdog President of the War Room Ballot

  • Total voters
    193
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Gandhi said:
Hence the term analogy, and it still sucks, mods are not are bosses in anyway
Click to expand...

I'll take it as a sign that you made no effort to support your analogy. As for you last assertion, that's not very impressive comparison skills. Mods say what is/isn't allowed and can ban you. That's like making/enforcing the rules and being able to fire people. They're basically middle-management. They sure aren't "regular" posters.

Going back to your idea, I don't support the usurpation of votes in that manner. Voting for a first round loser shouldn't allow them any power/weight of your vote later. Nothing says I'd support who they'd support so I shouldn't be used to further their own personal choices.

If it's looking like a tie then mods should contact any non-voters on the registry and tell them to vote or be removed in the future. That might be a good idea regardless.

How about we all get to vote for the mods if they're just regular posters? How does it work now? Mods choose new mods or what?

Lastly, who gives a fuck what I have to say anyway? I carry no weight here. :D
 
Anung Un Rama said:
Glenn bringing da funk. That is oddly perfect.
Click to expand...

Who says Asians ain't got rhythm.



























Oppa, Brained-Man Style!!!


0pXVILD.gif
 
Lead said:
Will GNN continue after the elections?
Click to expand...
The @Palis/Dr J campaign feels that the media plays an important role in WR politics. However, our opponent feels that the Presidential thread should be serious discussion only, so there might not be space for a media.

Well Gandhi, if you get your way at the close of the polls...

giphy.gif

@Palis will see to it that you don't.

@Palis/Dr J 2016
 
Cubo de Sangre said:
I'll take it as a sign that you made no effort to support your analogy. As for you last assertion, that's not very impressive comparison skills. Mods say what is/isn't allowed and can ban you. That's like making/enforcing the rules and being able to fire people. They're basically middle-management. They sure aren't "regular" posters.

Going back to your idea, I don't support the usurpation of votes in that manner. Voting for a first round loser shouldn't allow them any power/weight of your vote later. Nothing says I'd support who they'd support so I shouldn't be used to further their own personal choices.

If it's looking like a tie then mods should contact any non-voters on the registry and tell them to vote or be removed in the future. That might be a good idea regardless.

How about we all get to vote for the mods if they're just regular posters? How does it work now? Mods choose new mods or what?

Lastly, who gives a fuck what I have to say anyway? I carry no weight here. :D
Click to expand...
I heard mods get paid $1800 a month, true?
 
Cubo de Sangre said:
I'll take it as a sign that you made no effort to support your analogy. As for you last assertion, that's not very impressive comparison skills. Mods say what is/isn't allowed and can ban you. That's like making/enforcing the rules and being able to fire people. They're basically middle-management. They sure aren't "regular" posters.

Going back to your idea, I don't support the usurpation of votes in that manner. Voting for a first round loser shouldn't allow them any power/weight of your vote later. Nothing says I'd support who they'd support so I shouldn't be used to further their own personal choices.

If it's looking like a tie then mods should contact any non-voters on the registry and tell them to vote or be removed in the future. That might be a good idea regardless.

How about we all get to vote for the mods if they're just regular posters? How does it work now? Mods choose new mods or what?

Lastly, who gives a fuck what I have to say anyway? I carry no weight here. :D
Click to expand...

TL/DR except the last part :)
 
Ask yourself what kind of immigration policy you want in the War Room. One where @JDragon wastes your valuable resources on a "Wall" to keep Heavies posters out, or one where my DHS under President @Palis runs strict and efficient screening on these types of posters to make sure we maintain a high level of poster here.
 
ens189 said:
Ask yourself what kind of immigration policy you want in the War Room. One where @JDragon wastes your valuable resources on a "Wall" to keep Heavies posters out, or one where my DHS under President @Palis runs strict and efficient screening on these types of posters to make sure we maintain a high level of poster here.
Click to expand...
I surround myself with nothing but the best folks--the best!

images
 
ens189 said:
Ask yourself what kind of immigration policy you want in the War Room. One where @JDragon wastes your valuable resources on a "Wall" to keep Heavies posters out, or one where my DHS under President @Palis runs strict and efficient screening on these types of posters to make sure we maintain a high level of poster here.
Click to expand...

That's a serious misrepresentation of what Palis promised. The Palis campaign wants to create sort of a waiting room for prospective War Room posters:

Dr J said:
Lock the War Room with access granted to its current citizens.

• Create a War Room forum for foreigners looking to immigrate into the War Room

• Grant War Room citizenship to those in the foreigner forum who demonstrate dedication and a posting skill set that is appropriate for War Room standards. This will be at the discretion of current/future moderators and our administration.

@Palis/Dr J 2016
Click to expand...


On the other side, I value open discussion and give everyone the benefit of the doubt. Once here, we have the option of vetting them and making sure they adapt quickly or leave.

So ask yourself, who really has strict and efficient screening and who seeks to build up dual infrastructure?
 
JDRAGON CAMPAIGN ANNOUNCES INDEPENDENT ARBITRATOR

The JDragon campaign today announced the addition of an independent arbitrator that will, in a non-binding way, make judgments to resolve issues from posters. The new role will carry the title of Chief Executive Regulator Of Very Feebleminded Controversies. 'I cannot tell who it will be just yet', JDragon commented, 'but I can tell you that it will be someone who is perfectly suited for this role as he is in nobody's pocket due to his complete absence of a voter base.' JDragon further confirmed the same person would also become Chief Strategic Advisor.

The new role is in line with JDragon's campaign direction of bridging the divide in the War Room.
 
ens189 said:
Ask yourself what kind of immigration policy you want in the War Room. One where @JDragon wastes your valuable resources on a "Wall" to keep Heavies posters out, or one where my DHS under President @Palis runs strict and efficient screening on these types of posters to make sure we maintain a high level of poster here.
Click to expand...

Without a wall, how will we grant the heavyweight kulaks the socialized bullet to the brain stem?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,282,069
Messages
58,412,060
Members
176,031
Latest member
Golden Rhino

Share this page

Back
Top