Forrest at least proved he was tue best in his division for a time, even if that time was very short lived and he fell apart afterwards.
DC's LHW title wins aren't real title wins. He was never the best. I get that it isnt his fault Jones cant get his personal life together and of course he is going to take the belt they offered him...but he was never the best.
He then beat Stipe, tried his best to get an easy win in Brock to retire on, and lost to Stipe twice. Going 1-2 against Stipe isn't terrible by any means and having a win over him is impressive, but again, he lost the rivalry. He was #2 to Stipe.
He was never the best guy in any division and history will show that.
The best LHW ever not only cannot get his personal life together, he also struggles getting his professional life together. Let’s not forget the fight that was canceled due to a failed test and the other fight that was a NC due to another failed test. We can call Jon the best because he beat DC, but not without major controversy. While Jon was out due to suspension, DC was the best active LHW in the world.
Forrest had 0 title defenses. So Forrest proved he was the best for a short period of time but DC couldn’t be considered the best for a short period of time after beating Stipe the first time they fought?
DC wasn’t just trying to get an easy win against Brock. He was trying to get a money fight. No different than Usman or Woodly challenging Conor as champions.
Just seems like the bar is set higher for DC than anyone else and the rules for him are different. Kinda like DC pokes Stipe “oh DC is a dirty fighter. Stipe pokes DC “yeah but Stipe didn’t do it on purpose”. Not saying you said that, but just pointing out what I see in general—DC is held to a different standard for some reason.





