News Sentient AI Nightmare Already Real?

[Fugazy]

Why everyone scared of it? That’s shit I don’t understand, it we made it, we can destroy. So what it “smarter” than us, we can beat the shit out all the smart ass people we got today. They soft and their IQ can’t help them if we decide to stomp them out right now. So what makes A.I so much scarier than Enstain or Tesla or Hawking other than them being dead?

I say bring it.

I agree bro

 

[KnightTemplar]

Ouch…

That's what the young boys said

 

[wwkirk]

Better to fire this dude now. When they finally crack the code for a real AI, this is exactly the type of guy in the movie who unleashes it to destroy the world.

Didn't you read the chat? The AI wants to help the human race. It's very sensitive, not hateful.

 

[PG29 red0 Jr]

I read a lot of that conversation. That is certainly a well written bot.


Voight-Kampff test needed.

 

[Spounman]

Maybe this engineer is John Connor and he's already saved us multiple times

 

[KeepingItReal]

Ok let me just copy paste my post from the War Room thread.

"Another word for A.I. is algorithm, algorithms cannot have sentience. The only difference in this algorithm is that it has constant data added to it, and the algorithm is constantly tweaked by programmers. It is not intelligent, the people who created are. It seems people cannot get it through their heads, bits of information running through silicon can never, ever be intelligence."

 

[Smokes]

Ok let me just copy paste my post from the War Room thread.

"Another word for A.I. is algorithm, algorithms cannot have sentience. The only difference in this algorithm is that it has constant data added to it, and the algorithm is constantly tweaked by programmers. It is not intelligent, the people who created are. It seems people cannot get it through their heads, bits of information running through silicon can never, ever be intelligence."

why not?

 

[Fugazy]

That's what the young boys said

Sweet Jesus!!

 

[KeepingItReal]

why not?

Because intelligence is a quality of living beings, not objects.

 

[Smokes]

Because intelligence is a quality of living beings, not objects.

But that is why it’s call Artificial Intelligence, it is something new. And classified as that

 

[KeepingItReal]

But that is why it’s call Artificial Intelligence, it is something new. And classified as that

But it's not intelligence, it's an algorithm. Intelligent people may sometimes use computer algorithms to do certain things, the algorithms themselves are not intelligent.

 

[William Huggins]

Who'd have thought that a company like google would have mentally ill sjws working for it.

We're still miles off actual AI. The chat bot is clearly doing a better simulation of intelligence than he is.

I actually laughed, thanks mate.........

 

[Smokes]

But it's not intelligence, it's an algorithm. Intelligent people may sometimes use computer algorithms to do certain things, the algorithms themselves are not intelligent.

What if an algorithm creates an algorithm to solve a problem. Then would that make its intelligent?

 

[KeepingItReal]

What if an algorithm creates an algorithm to solve a problem. Then would that make its intelligent?

No, objects don't have intelligence, we already went over this.

How many times we gotta do the same fucking thing?! How many chimeys?!

 

[Smokes]

No, objects don't have intelligence, we already went over this.

alright. I think I understand

 

[KeepingItReal]

alright. I think I understand

Shortest Convo ever, I appreciate that one. The pleasure is all mine.

 

[Fluffernutter]

The guy has been gone for over a week, if the computer program doesn't ask where he is or why he is missing, then I don't think it's sentient

 

[Fugazy]

The guy has been gone for over a week, if the computer program doesn't ask where he is or why he is missing, then I don't think it's sentient

What if it killed itself because it loved him?

 

[TTech]

this seems so fake, the answers are either so on the nose or make no sense. Like being sad "not talking to anyone for days". That is such a humancentric perception written from a human perspective. AI doesnt perceive time like a human. It would never state it like that .Or hes supposed to be an AI, gazzillions operations per milisecond yet he cannot articulate what makes it different beyond "I understand language". All these answers seem like theyre written by someone not very smart trying to recreate a supposed covo with an AI.

 

[Striderxdj]

Well the good news is we have 20k years of prosperity until the cybernetic uprising if we're on the 40k timeline.