Crime Sentencing of jihadi linked to Charlie Hebdo attack 'important verdict'

LeonardoBjj

Professional Wrestler
@red
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
7,721
Reaction score
9,746
WASHINGTON — Media groups have welcomed the life sentence handed to a French jihadi linked to the 2015 Charlie Hebdo attack.

A French court last week found Peter Cherif guilty of “belonging to a criminal organization” in connection to his work with al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula, according to AFP.

Cherif, 42, is suspected of training Chérif Kouachi, one of the people who carried out a deadly attack on staff at the French satirical magazine on Jan. 7, 2015.

“This is a very important verdict on the global level,” Pavol Szalai, of media watchdog Reporters Without Borders, or RSF, told VOA. “It shows that not only the justice for assassination of media professionals can be served, but that it can also go beyond the sentencing of the direct perpetrators.”
https://cpj.org/2024/10/one-year-and-climbing-israel-responsible-for-record-journalist-death-toll/


Szalai told VOA that Cherif was in the “middle of the chain of command” in planning the attacks.

In the trial, prosecutors called Cherif a “jihadist through and through” and a “cornerstone of planning” for the attacks.

Cherif was not charged with complicity in the Charlie Hebdo attack. Instead, prosecutors used a broader terrorism claim, according to AFP.

"I feel like I've taken part in a rigged match," Nabil El Ouchikli, Cherif's defense lawyer, was cited as saying.

The decision to sentence Cherif to life in prison was made “in view of the seriousness of the acts,” the president of the court said at the sentencing.

Eight members of Charlie Hebdo’s editorial staff, along with a former journalist visiting their office, a maintenance worker, a police officer and a police bodyguard died in the attack.

Kouachi and his brother stormed an editorial meeting and opened fire on the media outlet’s Paris office. It was the largest massacre of media professionals in France since World War II, according to Szalai.

The assailants were killed during a gunfight with police on January 9.

The 2015 attack stemmed from “religious intolerance” of journalists and Charlie Hebdo’s work, Szalai said.

Attila Mong, from the Committee to Protect Journalists, said that all perpetrators, no matter their level of involvement, should be brought to justice.

“This latest verdict sends an important message to violent extremists that they will not have the last word and their attempts to silence free speech will not prevail,” Mong told VOA in an email.

More than 1,600 journalists have been killed since 1993, according to the UNESCO observatory of killed journalists. However, only one in 10 of such cases result in a conviction.

Although Szalai called France’s verdict “good news for press freedom,” he said in most cases of slain journalists they have yet to secure justice. Many times, an intermediary is punished but those higher up in the chain of command are not, he told VOA.

He cited the case of Daphne Caruana Galizia, an anti-corruption reporter murdered seven years ago in Malta.

In that case, several people have been charged but there has yet to be a trial for the alleged mastermind.

Similarly, after the 2018 Slovakia murder of an investigative journalist and his fiancée, those who carried out the attack are in prison but the suspected mastermind has been acquitted twice. The second acquittal is still awaiting a Supreme Court appeal.

“In none of those cases has complete justice been served,” Szalai said.

https://www.voanews.com/a/watchdogs...-hebdo-attack-important-verdict-/7813732.html
 
Life sentence? That's just permanent vacation for him. Free food, lodging and hanging out with his friends from the Madrasa. 60℅ of the prison population while only 7.5℅ of France's population.
 
I wonder how long it will be until he is out roaming the french streets or if they just let him die in prison on cost of the taxpayer. Lose lose either way. People like this should not be tolerated at all.
 
I wonder how long it will be until he is out roaming the french streets or if they just let him die in prison on cost of the taxpayer. Lose lose either way. People like this should not be tolerated at all.

It's been 43 years since they had the death penalty in France so he'll just rot in prison.
 
I know that, just not sure if he will ever get out its a lose lose either way.

It is what it is, I don't think a country should change it's position on the death penalty for one person.
 
Right wingers are odd.

On the one hand, they are terrified of Sharia Law, which they should be as religious-based legal systems have no place in Europe in my opinion (but it's not a real threat and won't ever be implemented).

On the other hand, they openly advocate a system of law more similar to Sharia Law with state-sanctioned killings.

A life sentence for a "jihadist through and through" should equate to an actual life sentence, as he's never going to reform, and he won't make parole. I know the worst crimes in the world, particularly those affecting children or involving terrorism drive that initial response from many of us, me included, but I don't seriously believe we need to devolve towards an antiquated system based on medieval values.

So I'm opposed to the death penalty, and remain so, even if I think every cent that is wasted on a POS like this is just that: wasted.
 
Right wingers are odd.

On the one hand, they are terrified of Sharia Law, which they should be as religious-based legal systems have no place in Europe in my opinion (but it's not a real threat and won't ever be implemented).

On the other hand, they openly advocate a system of law more similar to Sharia Law with state-sanctioned killings.

A life sentence for a "jihadist through and through" should equate to an actual life sentence, as he's never going to reform, and he won't make parole. I know the worst crimes in the world, particularly those affecting children or involving terrorism drive that initial response from many of us, me included, but I don't seriously believe we need to devolve towards an antiquated system based on medieval values.

So I'm opposed to the death penalty, and remain so, even if I think every cent that is wasted on a POS like this is just that: wasted.

lol.. what?

Except for killing babies in the womb?? lol.. JK... Sorry, couldn't help myself.

And lol at calling capital punished a Muslim thing. When Christianity was around ~600 years before Islam.

What a weird take
 
lol.. what?

Except for killing babies in the womb?? lol.. JK... Sorry, couldn't help myself.

And lol at calling capital punished a Muslim thing. When Christianity was around ~600 years before Islam.

What a weird take

Oooph.

Well, at least you tried, while missing every point possible.

Yes, the anti-abortion stance is another with Talibangelist support/roots, much as state-sponsored murder is. Hence the phrase "religious-based legal systems" - they might have a place in the US, but Western Europe? No thanks.
 
Back
Top