I honestly disagree and I'll explain why.
At the start of his first candidacy run it became clear early on he wasn't going to be represented fairly by the media. I wanted to check on some of the claims they made, so instead of just reading their articles or their 10second clip, I watched several whole rallies and I was very surprised at how much gets left out and not reported on.
He regularly calls for uniting as a country and talks highly of immigrants that came with a good work ethic and have become successful Americans. He has well thought out policies and plans that will help specific groups of people. I never saw any of those positive statements reported on.
He seemed genuinely frustrated with the way the democratic party behaved last election. He really did talk alot about reaching out a hand, joining together and making America great. You should watch some of his speeches from 2016. They're very, very positive about the communities people accuse him of hating. It's surreal to see after what gets reported on.
I do think his rhetoric this time around is less friendly than last, which is a genuine shame. He does appear to have completely given up on any sort of partisanship, although I can't say I blame him the way he has been treated. It's been made clear the democrats have no wish to find any compromise on any subject and would rather tear the country apart than work together.
It's not my guide to politics, it's an observation in the different behaviour from each group in the same style of videos. Am I wrong about their behaviour?
The Whatever podcast is a good example of idiots trying to make dumber idiots look stupid on the internet.
I do believe the commentators in university tours do so in a genuine attempt to get young liberals speaking about or looking at otherwise controversial/taboo topics from a different point of view as they are unlikely to encounter that sort of debate otherwise in their time on campus.
I'm just a dude giving another dude my opinion. We're still allowed to do that right?