- Joined
- Nov 7, 2012
- Messages
- 7,003
- Reaction score
- 1
Nope, God creates stuff. All humans do is play with and manipulate things that have already been created.
nah, humans create new stuff all the time.
Nope, God creates stuff. All humans do is play with and manipulate things that have already been created.
Nope, God creates stuff. All humans do is play with and manipulate things that have already been created.
Sooo, I don't get it. Are they making a super E.Coli strand? Isn't E.Coli supposed to be quite dangerous?
If famine, war and atrocities committed by humans relate to free will where do you chalk up natural disasters and pandemics?
Explain the VCR then.
I said nothing that would give you grounds to make such a comment. You're just being defensively hostile as per usual when people mention you in a thread that somehow links to religion.
Explain the VCR then.
OK, gotcha, thanks.No problem I believe they are saying that they made a new strain of E. coli that can live without without the same DNA as what is required to sustain life on earth. I believe that is why they call it alien DNA? Essentially they created a new life form that can be used to test new type of drugs and treatments?
You're right, it would be much bigger news than a new dna strand I think.I don't think so. What they have done is pretty cool and impressive but yeah if they were actually creating life from non-living matter then that would be a game changer.
Thanks, that's the distinction I was missing... creating a life form is not quite the same as creating life.All life on earth has two-pairs of DNA. They created a life form with three-pairs. Well, they just "altered" an already living life form but they proved that it can live with two extra types of DNA, and that doesn't EXIST on this planet. So it is alien.
Creepy and exciting. Maybe we can have flying horses since its taking so dam long for flying cars to arrive. Stupid Back to the Future ll lied!
... and the devil, homosexuality, cancer, marijuana and Justin Beiber.
You were spouting your usual nonsense regarding god. I merely pointed out that if god created "sruff" he then also had to have engineered famine, Nigerian kidnappings, mass murder, rape of babies and other things.
Either god created these things or it did not.
Not sure what you're rambling on about.
What if he did? So what?
If famine, war and atrocities committed by humans relate to free will where do you chalk up natural disasters and pandemics?
If he did create famine then he created famine.
That's what I'm saying.
It was not I who needed to form a hasty defense of god's indifference to or unwillingness to help with suffering around the world but fellow poster, Comeback Kid.
Why should God help out relieving the suffering in this world? Are we so useless and ungovernable as a people that we require help with everything we do solely to avoid responsibility for our actions and ultimately blame someone else? God is an observer. Why should he constantly intervene and mess around with his experiment? Sounds counterproductive to what he intended.
You don't believe that "natural" disasters and pandemics can be created by humans in a lab or that our technology can influence earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, tidal waves, etc?
Red herring.
The dichotomy which I presented was both absolute and valid.
If god is real and if god created space and time then god watches with indifference or chooses not to help the human species when they need it.
God is either powerless, evil or non existent. Take your pick.
I don't mean to be harsh but this is the reality.. you cannot chalk it down to "god has a plan" because that is a grotesque and immoral argument by modern standards.
Red herring.
The dichotomy which I presented was both absolute and valid.
If god is real and if god created space and time then god watches with indifference or chooses not to help the human species when they need it.
God is either powerless, evil or non existent. Take your pick.
I don't mean to be harsh but this is the reality.. you cannot chalk it down to "god has a plan" because that is a grotesque and immoral argument by modern standards.