- Joined
- Mar 2, 2008
- Messages
- 44,751
- Reaction score
- 10,517
lmao @ 750,000 = $2000/mo
All markets and situations are different, if you need the flexibility then renting is likely the better and cheaper option.
If you can afford it and are putting down some roots than owning > renting... I'm sure Revo would back me up on that.
Hey Revo, how much better of a situation are you in owning a home with a boatload of equity in SoCal, probably for the cost (or maybe even less than the cost of renting that same place)
I'll provide an example.
Two friends of mine are engineers who went to school out of state and moved back here when they finished, both got pretty great jobs. One decided to rent on the westside and live carefree, the other bought house a little further away and rented out a room or two to make it work.
The one still rents, the other came up 6 figures on the sale of that place and parlayed it into an even nicer place and pays less per month than the renter, and still has all that equity. Give it another 10 years and he will be free and clear on a damn near million dollar asset and the other guy might JUST be buying.
Factor in the tax advantages and like I said, it's an excellent wealth building tool.
Spoken like any random person who works in real estate.
