- Joined
- Apr 24, 2016
- Messages
- 1,349
- Reaction score
- 228
Who would have won if they fought? Peter wouldn't have to go looking for Tua, which I think favors him.
Peter was bigger, more awkward and arguably hit harder.
Peter also has a better resume (Toney x2, Maskaev).
Tua beat a lot of green fighters like Ruiz, Maskaev and Rahman and shot fighters like Michael Moorer. All things considered, Tua's best win is Fres Oquendo - a small heavyweight.
So Tua who beat a lineal unified champion in Rahman, and a world title holder in Ruiz(who also beat Holyfield)..and you consider his best win against Oquendo....just fuck off!!!
Where are these fucking trolls coming from these days?
And you also claim that Maskaev is a better win for Peter...wtf...and Toney was about 5 stone and 5 years past his best when he even got to HW, never mind when he fought Peter
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!! Oquendo - FFS.
Tua and Ibeabuchi fought fucking hard for 12 rounds, even though Tua lost, he still has more credit than 95% of the heavyweights from the same generation, and some would even argue he should have got the nod in that fight
But Peter who beat an old fat Toney, Williams and troubled Wlad is better....get the fuck off the boxing forum please
I always liked peters use of the triple jab. Wish more guys could pull it offTough to identify anything that Peter is better than Tua at.