• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Law Same sex marriage under review?

Those nations require 14 year old children to marry the father of their unborn child who raped them?
You asked age of consent and thought it was outrageous a 14 year old could do so. Germany is one such place. So is Italy.

But no I don't think anybody should be required to marry anyone and I don't agree with wanting to ban same sex marriages which is your topic of discussion.
 
Those nations require 14 year old children to marry the father of their unborn child who raped them?

Where the fuck are you coming up with forced and raped you ding bat.

Show me where I ever posted that.

You then wonder why people think you are on dtugs.
 
You asked age of consent and thought it was outrageous a 14 year old could do so. Germany is one such place. So is Italy.

But no I don't think anybody should be required to marry anyone and I don't agree with wanting to ban same sex marriages which is your topic of discussion.
They got a lot of arrange marriages in the Middle East, but I bet she has nothing to say about that.
 
You asked age of consent and thought it was outrageous a 14 year old could do so. Germany is one such place. So is Italy.

But no I don't think anybody should be required to marry anyone and I don't agree with wanting to ban same sex marriages which is your topic of discussion.
Age of consent at 14 having being raped and forced into marriage in any country is beyond fucked up. Anyone agreeing that that's okay needs to be carted off.
 
Okay @oldshadow let's start afresh, why do you think 14 year old children should have to marry the man who raped them and made them pregnant?
I know Sherdog gonna Sherdog and women are sluts and gagging to be raped because they taunt men as 15 year olds. It's happened in Mayberry for decades.

Why do 14 year olds have to marry men who raped them?
 
Last edited:
There's no argument to be made against same sex marriage, and there hasn't been ever since various governments incentivized and stacked the cards towards those who are married.

Excluding anyone from obtaining significant legal and financial benefits based on some flimsy whackadoodle religious bullshit is something only a complete piece of shit would attempt to do.

But I think most people see that by now thanks to decades of pushing.
I agree yet for some reason the outspoken LBGTQ loves the people that hate them and hate the country that will tolerate them.. Biazaro world

(Legal Recognition, Living Conditions, and Risks – October 2025)
AspectIsraelIranGaza Strip
Domestic same-sex marriage Not allowed (no civil marriage for anyone) Illegal and impossible Illegal and impossible
Recognition of foreign same-sex marriage Full legal rights (taxes, inheritance, adoption, immigration, healthcare) since 2006 Supreme Court ruling No recognition; foreign marriage offers zero protection No recognition; irrelevant under local law
Can a same-sex couple live together openly? Yes, safely in most areas (especially Tel Aviv, Haifa, Jerusalem) No – life-threatening No – extreme danger
Legal penalty for same-sex acts None (decriminalized since 1988) Death penalty (hanging for "sodomy") Up to 10 years in prison (British Mandate law still enforced)
Social acceptance High in urban/secular areas; Tel Aviv has one of the world’s largest Pride parades Severe taboo; family honor killings common Strong social rejection; vigilante violence frequent
LGBTQ+ rights protections Strong: anti-discrimination in employment, military, housing; gender change on ID allowed None – state persecution None – Hamas actively hostile
Adoption by same-sex couples Allowed since 2008 Not possible Not possible
Transgender rights Legal gender change (no surgery required since 2015); hormone therapy covered Surgery allowed (state-funded), but only to "correct" gender — not for relationships No legal pathway
Real-world safety for couples Couples hold hands, live together, raise kids — common in cities Must hide completely or flee; asylum seekers common Many flee to Israel or West Bank; torture and killings reported


 
Okay @oldshadow let's start afresh, why do you think 14 year old children should have to marry the man who raped them and made them pregnant?
I know Sherdog gonna Sherdog and women are sluts and gagging to be raped because they taunt men as 15 year olds. It's happened in Mayberry for decades.

Why do 14 year olds have to marry men who raped them?

Where the fuck did I ever say that. Show me where.

One more time my post was about two teens that legally have sex and the female gets pregnant. I said under very particular circumstances and requirements they may be allowed to get married if they both want to. I gave an example that I knew of in the past. That's what I posted nothing about rape or forced to marry. Do you understand that.
 
Last edited:
regarding his one point about dems stuffing inappropriate material in schools, did you guys seriously memory hole the biden years??? like holy shit, i can't even..
He said, “schools to insert gay porn into their libraries”
Please cite a single example of this.
 
He said, “schools to insert gay porn into their libraries”
Please cite a single example of this.

you don't remember the left going apeshit over "book bannings" just a few years ago? they weren't even "book bannings" actually, the right was rightly pushing remove to inappropriate material in children's libraries, which included the standard leftist filth, which was mostly gay kink, teaching things like "rimjobs" and the standard drag queen nonsense at the time. you guys seriously don't remember all the schoolboard meetings of angry parents reading those books out loud, only to be censored or cutoff by leftist school board members?

how tf do you guys not remember this????? like holy shit, do y'all lie ALL the time??
 
The evidence is the fact that a child can only be created by two people of opposite sexes, so it's reasonable to assume that this is the ideal combo for raising a child.

By that logic would it be reasonable to take children away from single mothers so they can be adopted by couples?
 
The ideal is 2 biological parents, with a planned pregnancy, within a loving stable relationship ideology or attempts at social engineering isn't going to solve it........

This isn't to say other options cannot work, it's to say that statically they have the best outcomes for everyone.

I'm not against 2 people of the same sex getting married and honouring their vows to each other and providing a loving home to children, but if your union isn't within the religion you claim to be within, then maybe you need to change religion?
 
The outcomes for step parents involved have a greater risk of abuse it's called the Cinderella effect.

Yeah but when we're talking adoption we have to compare things to the care system. Unless you're willing to consider making childbirth outside of marriage illegal you're going to end up with children who need adopting and if they don't get adopted then they're at the mercy of the care system.
 
What if the biological mother then got into a lesbian relationship?
Well, then, I suppose the child would have to grow up in a two mom house, and I realize there will eventually be some rare cases like you describe, but this to me is kinda like the “what about the girls who got pregnant through sa” argument for abortions. It makes no sense to make rules to accommodate a tiny percentage over the vast majority… and I’m not against making exceptions in certain cases, my point is it shouldn’t be promoted or encouraged.
 
Well, then, I suppose the child would have to grow up in a two mom house, and I realize there will eventually be some rare cases like you describe, but this to me is kinda like the “what about the girls who got pregnant through sa” argument for abortions. It makes no sense to make rules to accommodate a tiny percentage over the vast majority… and I’m not against making exceptions in certain cases, my point is it shouldn’t be promoted or encouraged.

Just to clarify, if the choice (as it often is) is the kid stays in the care system or is adopted by a same sex couple, which do you choose?
 
The whole "benefits for marriage" thing is a fairly old scam.

What marriage offers should be a right for all those in long-term relationships or cohabiting or whatever, but of course some assholes want to exclude/prevent some people from being married in the first place.

If marriage was literally just symbolic, hey, no problem.

But when the government gets involved, symbolism is off the table and it becomes purely political. That's why there is no credible argument against same sex marriages.
- What i dont get is: If the gay people get the right to marry, how they can loss that after? I thought in law, you dont loss beneficies.
 
Back
Top