• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Law Same sex marriage under review?

Freedom of association as long as they get no public funding and are private.

If a church say rents out halls for things then they have to follow the laws on that.

Do you agree with DEI.
Freedom of religion is indeed what our country was built on, whether you want or not want to practice. Did it say that churches like FLDS who marry children like you were suggesting was okay if they were pregnant and obviously used goods not fit for another suitor.
 
So not churches.

That contradicts what you said but ok.

Actual DEI or the made up stuff MAGA folks cry about?

Yes churches on who can become members or who they provide services for as long as they are not things like renting for profit. They can't advertise renting a hall for parties for profit and not following the laws for doing it.

DEI is discrimination especially say in college admissions.
 
Last edited:
Freedom of religion is indeed what our country was built on, whether you want or not want to practice. Did it say that churches like FLDS who marry children like you were suggesting was okay if they were pregnant and obviously used goods not fit for another suitor.

That is not what I said they still have to follow laws but they are giving freedom to practice some discrimination as they should be. They should not be required to perform gay marriage as one of them.

Where the fuck did I say anything about used goods. Why are you making shit up when I explained what I was talking about clearly.
 
Grants and tax exemptions

Tax exemption is to separate church and state. They must follow rules to stay tax exempt.

Grants for churches are very narrow.

Grant limitations
  • Non-religious activities: Government funds cannot be used for inherently religious activities like worship services, notes Catholic Funding Guide.
  • Focus on community: Grants are typically tied to specific, non-religious community projects, such as building repairs, community engagement, or providing services to underserved populations.
 
That is not what I said they still have to follow laws but they are giving freedom to practice some discrimination as they should be. They should not be required to perform gay marriage as one of them.

Where the fuck did I say anything about used goods. Why are you making shit up when I explained what I was talking about clearly.
No, you said yourself you were ambiguous about children having to get married if they are raped.
 
No, you said yourself you were ambiguous about children having to get married if they are raped.

And again that not at all what I said. I dont know why I bother with trying to have any type of conversation with you when you make up shit I didn't say.

Is it rape if a 14 year old and a 16 year have consensual sex.

I never said anything about forced marriage.
 
Tax exemption is to separate church and state. They must follow rules to stay tax exempt.

Grants for churches are very narrow.

Grant limitations
  • Non-religious activities: Government funds cannot be used for inherently religious activities like worship services, notes Catholic Funding Guide.
  • Focus on community: Grants are typically tied to specific, non-religious community projects, such as building repairs, community engagement, or providing services to underserved populations.
Churches that accept grants are not legally allowed to operate like private clubs regardless of what they use their grants for.

 
And again that not at all what I said. I dont know why I bother with trying to have any type of conversation with you when you make up shit I didn't say.

Is it rape if a 14 year old and a 16 year have consensual sex.

I never said anything about forced marriage.
So what was your point bringing up pregnancy with 14 year olds needing to be married then?
 
Churches that accept grants are not legally allowed to operate like private clubs regardless of what they use their grants for.


They are giving lead way if its for religious reasons. You can't and should not be able to force them to perform things like gay marriages. If they believe their religion forbids gays or other races from becoming members that should be allowed even if it seems stupid to me or you.
 
So what was your point bringing up pregnancy with 14 year olds needing to be married then?

I said I could see it being allowed under very specific circumstances and requirements. I gave you an example thst i knew of in real life also.
 
I said I could see it being allowed under very specific circumstances and requirements. I gave you an example thst i knew of in real life also.
Bollocks. You're condoning a 14 year old being married off after being raped.
There are NO circumstances for that.
 
They are giving lead way if its for religious reasons. You can't and should not be able to force them to perform things like gay marriages. If they believe their religion forbids gays or other races from becoming members that should be allowed even if it seems stupid to me or you.
Theres a difference between not performing a specific service that goes against your faith and denying access to services in general for arbitrary reason. You were asked if they should be able to deny based on race. You said yes. Nothing in the Christian faith supports this idea
 
Bollocks. You're condoning a 14 year old being married off after being raped.
There are NO circumstances for that.

What rape. Ding bat.

I said if the age of consent was 14 under certain conditions like romeo and juliet laws.
 
What rape. Ding bat.

I said if the age of consent was 14 under certain conditions like romeo and juliet laws.
You are condoning rape. Fucking hell, how are you continuing with this. No 14 year old can consent. Jesus fuck.
 
Theres a difference between not performing a specific service that goes against your faith and denying access to services in general for arbitrary reason. You were asked if they should be able to deny based on race. You said yes. Nothing in the Christian faith supports this idea

Your (and mine) interpretation may support that but if it can and the way the Bible is written it can be then it should be allowed. In fact it was at one time.

Black Hebrew Israelite hold these race views and they should be allowed to.
 
Your (and mine) interpretation may support that but if it can and the way the Bible is written it can be then it should be allowed. In fact it was at one time.

Black Hebrew Israelite hold these race views and they should be allowed to.
!!!!
 
Back
Top