Crime Sainsbury’s tests facial recognition technology in effort to tackle shoplifting

LeonardoBjj

Professional Wrestler
@Silver
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
12,581
Reaction score
15,518
Retailer starts eight-week trial at stores in London and Bath before potentially expanding nationwide

Sarah Butler and agency

Sainsbury’s has begun testing the use of controversial facial recognition technology in its UK shops as part of efforts to tackle shoplifters.

The UK’s second largest supermarket chain told staff in two stores – a supermarket in Sydenham, south-east London, and convenience store in Oldfield Park in Bath– that it was starting an eight-week trial before potentially rolling out the technology nationwide.
images

Sainsbury’s has said the technology is part of its efforts to identify shoplifters and curb a sharp increase in retail crime in recent years, but privacy campaigners condemned the plans as “chilling”.

The number of shoplifting offences recorded by police in England and Wales rose last year to the highest level on record, according to the latest official figures released in April, surpassing half a million offences for the first time.

Use of facial recognition in shops has been heavily criticised in recent years, with rival Asda facing thousands of complaints after launching its own similar trial earlier this year.
352f565362413922d553f160c0f770a5.jpg

A Metropolitan police plan to widen the use of live facial recognition technology at “mass events” was criticised by the equalities regulator as unlawful last month, after research indicated that black men were proportionally more likely to trigger an alert. The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) said its use was intrusive and could have a “chilling effect” on individuals’ rights.

Bosses at Sainsbury’s, which has more than 1,400 shops across the country, said the planned rollout was “not about monitoring colleagues” or customers.

The supermarket chain is working with the facial recognition business Facewatch as part of the trial. Fellow retailers Home Bargains, Flannels, Costcutter and Sports Direct have reportedly used similar Facewatch technology in stores to identify shoplifters.
C1a6_WBXcAE1DDM.jpg

Sainbury’s said the technology would be used to help it identify and potentially ban people who are “violent, aggressive or steal in the store”.

The company said records would be deleted instantly if the software did not recognise the face of reported individuals. It added that the system issued an alert based on criminal behaviour submitted by the store or other retailers using Facewatch nearby.

Madeleine Stone, the senior advocacy officer at the privacy group Big Brother Watch, told PA Media: “Sainsbury’s decision to trial Orwellian facial recognition technology in its shops is deeply disproportionate and chilling.

“Sainsbury’s should abandon this trial and the government must urgently step in to prevent the unchecked spread of this invasive technology.”
36824041894_5b5b657806_w.jpg

Security officers @KnightTemplar and @fingercuffs


Sainsbury’s said incidents of theft, abuse and threatening behaviour “continue to rise” despite working with the police and the government, adding that it was “affecting Sainsbury’s teams across the UK daily”.

Simon Roberts, the retailer’s chief executive, said: “We have listened to the deep concerns our colleagues and customers have and they’re right to expect us to act. The retail sector is at a crossroads, facing rising abuse, antisocial behaviour and violence. We must put safety first.

“We understand that facial recognition technology can raise valid questions about data and privacy. This trial and subsequent rollout is not about monitoring colleagues or our valued customers.
pcs-robocop-ed-209-quarter-scale-statue-gallery-67f05520a1418_853f1471-4381-4dce-aebf-ab1590ae8c2b_900x900.jpg

- Take your shirt off and show me your bra!

“It’s focused solely on identifying serious offenders who have committed acts of violence, aggression or theft, helping our teams prevent further harm.”

Joanne Thomas, the general secretary of the Usdaw union, said: “We welcome Sainsbury’s ongoing programme of work to protect retail workers and customers from the continued threat of abuse and violence in stores.

“We look forward to seeing the results of the trial of facial recognition software and will continue to work closely with Sainsbury’s to support a responsible, evidence-led approach to tackling retail crime.”

https://www.theguardian.com/busines...on-technology-in-effort-to-tackle-shoplifting
 
Don't see how this is legal. Seems like a data protection issue.
Shops have all shared images of prolific shoplifters for years on private databases that assist their loss prevention officers identify potential thieves. The facial rec technology is just doing what a human used to do.

As long as the data captured is securely stored, there is no data protection issue.

Your ugly mug is already stored on countless CCTV databases in retail and public places, along with your vehicles on ANPR on private car parks.
 
Shops have all shared images of prolific shoplifters for years on private databases that assist their loss prevention officers identify potential thieves. The facial rec technology is just doing what a human used to do.

As long as the data captured is securely stored, there is no data protection issue.

Your ugly mug is already stored on countless CCTV databases in retail and public places, along with your vehicles on ANPR on private car parks.

Sure, but it's not secured alongside my personal details I assume.

I have no issue if they're just keeping pictures to send the rozzers but if they're tying my face to my nectar card or whatever then I'm not sure how I feel about that.
 
This is useless unless there is some actual punishment involved.

The idea would be to id stop them and have them criminality trespassed.

This is in the UK, correct so what's the penalties for criminal trespassing.

In the US it can be a felony.
 
Sure, but it's not secured alongside my personal details I assume.

I have no issue if they're just keeping pictures to send the rozzers but if they're tying my face to my nectar card or whatever then I'm not sure how I feel about that.
It depends what database they are running the facial scans against. From my understanding, they have their own database they have built of known shoplifters.

Even if they had your face attached to their reward card scheme, that still would be illegal or a data protection issue of it's covered in the T&Cs, that no one reads
 
This is useless unless there is some actual punishment involved.

The idea would be to id stop them and have them criminality trespassed.

This is in the UK, correct so what's the penalties for criminal trespassing.

In the US it can be a felony.

I'm guessing it's just so if someone comes into the store they can get a security guard to follow them around.
 
Pointless, the sewer rats committing these crimes don't get punished anyway so who cares whether they use this tech or not.

There's a supposed asylum seeker who sits outside my local supermarket - one evening plain clothes police had him outside and there was supermarket items literally overflowing from his pockets, his waistband area. Three hours later, he was back sitting outside the same store. There is no deterrent at all. Our police refuse to act on actual criminals and prefer to monitor white people's social media posts instead.
 
It depends what database they are running the facial scans against. From my understanding, they have their own database they have built of known shoplifters.

Even if they had your face attached to their reward card scheme, that still would be illegal or a data protection issue of it's covered in the T&Cs, that no one reads

I haven't nicked anything since a few cream eggs when I was about 14 (which I still feel guilty about) so I should be okay I guess lol.
 
Does facial recognition work on those most likely to shoplift in Britain?

They all seem to look the same, when not wearing their balaclavas.
 
Don't see how this is legal. Seems like a data protection issue.
I mean if you're on private property like a shop, shouldn't it be legal?
I remember people going nuts about it being their right to not wear masks during Covid, should it not be up to the business to do what they want? You're I'm sure more than welcome to not go there.

Fuck do I miss Sainsbury's fish counter, duck and steak. It's not quite the same in the US.
 
Shops have all shared images of prolific shoplifters for years on private databases that assist their loss prevention officers identify potential thieves. The facial rec technology is just doing what a human used to do.

As long as the data captured is securely stored, there is no data protection issue.

Your ugly mug is already stored on countless CCTV databases in retail and public places, along with your vehicles on ANPR on private car parks.
- We had pictures one of the girls that used to steal in one store i worked was my hot neighbor. But i've never seen her at the store, just picutures of her at the monitors room. Other criminals were quite recurrent, several of them stole pety things without any real valor to the store to care about. Like a bombom, a andy bar, or Pão de queijo:, (cheese bread?)

Pao-de-queijo-Essa-Receita-Funciona-9.jpg
 
I mean if you're on private property like a shop, shouldn't it be legal?
I remember people going nuts about it being their right to not wear masks during Covid, should it not be up to the business to do what they want? You're I'm sure more than welcome to not go there.

Fuck do I miss Sainsbury's fish counter, duck and steak. It's not quite the same in the US.


Covid masks is your workaround then I suppose, if you want to evade it.
 
One from empty nonsense is that businesses doesn't use CCTV ( and not only pics, also voice recording what is real meaning for CCTV ) to monitor employees.
All retail sales businesses use to control employees. Aren't they lazy? Who and how uses cash machine etc....

Pinnacle is when some shops chains started to use " chips " for small and cheap butter packages too.

Ofc I do know why it is worth to place really highly priced stuff in area, where client can't get them without asking shop assistant.
However to chip 2-3 £ worth small butter packages looks ridiculous idea....


BTW most nasty offenders are kids....if something will get wrong, problems will have parents, no one will lock them somewhere etc...

The same with hooligans. Underage stuff often does knows their rights more than adults...internet..
I'm only 12, wtf, I just damaged window, call my parents...
Don't yell on me, it is psychological pressure, I do have rights...I'm only 12 etc.
 
Last edited:
BTW biggest retail sales shops problems aren't shoplifters.

Since covid era it is delivery services and internet for shopping.
A lot of ppl are picking orders in internet and delivery service is delivering them stuff they asked for.
Or even might create orders collect stuff almost like from warehouse.
Business still does have retail store, expenses for mortgage tax, maintenance, perssonel, utilities etc....
 
Retailer starts eight-week trial at stores in London and Bath before potentially expanding nationwide

Sarah Butler and agency

Sainsbury’s has begun testing the use of controversial facial recognition technology in its UK shops as part of efforts to tackle shoplifters.

The UK’s second largest supermarket chain told staff in two stores – a supermarket in Sydenham, south-east London, and convenience store in Oldfield Park in Bath– that it was starting an eight-week trial before potentially rolling out the technology nationwide.
images

Sainsbury’s has said the technology is part of its efforts to identify shoplifters and curb a sharp increase in retail crime in recent years, but privacy campaigners condemned the plans as “chilling”.

The number of shoplifting offences recorded by police in England and Wales rose last year to the highest level on record, according to the latest official figures released in April, surpassing half a million offences for the first time.

Use of facial recognition in shops has been heavily criticised in recent years, with rival Asda facing thousands of complaints after launching its own similar trial earlier this year.
352f565362413922d553f160c0f770a5.jpg

A Metropolitan police plan to widen the use of live facial recognition technology at “mass events” was criticised by the equalities regulator as unlawful last month, after research indicated that black men were proportionally more likely to trigger an alert. The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) said its use was intrusive and could have a “chilling effect” on individuals’ rights.

Bosses at Sainsbury’s, which has more than 1,400 shops across the country, said the planned rollout was “not about monitoring colleagues” or customers.

The supermarket chain is working with the facial recognition business Facewatch as part of the trial. Fellow retailers Home Bargains, Flannels, Costcutter and Sports Direct have reportedly used similar Facewatch technology in stores to identify shoplifters.
C1a6_WBXcAE1DDM.jpg

Sainbury’s said the technology would be used to help it identify and potentially ban people who are “violent, aggressive or steal in the store”.

The company said records would be deleted instantly if the software did not recognise the face of reported individuals. It added that the system issued an alert based on criminal behaviour submitted by the store or other retailers using Facewatch nearby.

Madeleine Stone, the senior advocacy officer at the privacy group Big Brother Watch, told PA Media: “Sainsbury’s decision to trial Orwellian facial recognition technology in its shops is deeply disproportionate and chilling.

“Sainsbury’s should abandon this trial and the government must urgently step in to prevent the unchecked spread of this invasive technology.”
36824041894_5b5b657806_w.jpg

Security officers @KnightTemplar and @fingercuffs


Sainsbury’s said incidents of theft, abuse and threatening behaviour “continue to rise” despite working with the police and the government, adding that it was “affecting Sainsbury’s teams across the UK daily”.

Simon Roberts, the retailer’s chief executive, said: “We have listened to the deep concerns our colleagues and customers have and they’re right to expect us to act. The retail sector is at a crossroads, facing rising abuse, antisocial behaviour and violence. We must put safety first.

“We understand that facial recognition technology can raise valid questions about data and privacy. This trial and subsequent rollout is not about monitoring colleagues or our valued customers.
pcs-robocop-ed-209-quarter-scale-statue-gallery-67f05520a1418_853f1471-4381-4dce-aebf-ab1590ae8c2b_900x900.jpg

- Take your shirt off and show me your bra!

“It’s focused solely on identifying serious offenders who have committed acts of violence, aggression or theft, helping our teams prevent further harm.”

Joanne Thomas, the general secretary of the Usdaw union, said: “We welcome Sainsbury’s ongoing programme of work to protect retail workers and customers from the continued threat of abuse and violence in stores.

“We look forward to seeing the results of the trial of facial recognition software and will continue to work closely with Sainsbury’s to support a responsible, evidence-led approach to tackling retail crime.”

https://www.theguardian.com/busines...on-technology-in-effort-to-tackle-shoplifting
You're going to give back all that stolen Lego :D
 
Sure, but it's not secured alongside my personal details I assume.

I have no issue if they're just keeping pictures to send the rozzers but if they're tying my face to my nectar card or whatever then I'm not sure how I feel about that.
This is easy to get why btw.
I usually pay for alco with cash and for other stuff with card.
It does looks better for banks I use.

And no, it isn't paranoia about possible bad profile. One from banks had allowed me for one deal to delay scheduled payments with 0 extra cent..when I had shit and they literally ignored some stuff ... yes, this wasn't just some one small private loan...
In the end they anyway get all contracted $...however if they didn't had ignored some delays, they easily might had ruined ..a lot...
It wasn't simple loan, more complicated stuff. One lecture then I had get: think xx times before guarantee some % from business loan you and your friends had get.
Ofc after lecture they paid ...later in time.
 
Back
Top