• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

International Russia/Ukraine Megathread V15

Ukraine, doesn't makes sense even who will rule them, does have 0 normal future chances for ukrainians.
They ofc will have chances without living in indebted chinesse ameriacan russian colonium. Only then.


Now ofc sooner or later will be bottlemates peace deal. Till next war when all Ukraine will be russia. West sold them long ago.

0 chances to escape.
Ofc additionally debts, dairy farm cows will be feeded by telemarathon in order to keep them milked dry, bear inflation and life in debts from salary till next salary. Poverty and life in debts is destiny. Doesn't matter will be ukr ruled by pro western or pro russian rulers, 0 difference...

Part of dairy farm will be given to russians with friendly smile, another part will be dairy farm for cows ( plebs ) to milk them dry completely till level that they will agree even to be in Zimbabwe.....
Later another part too will be Matushka, west had obiviously sold them long ago.
0 future for some 99% casuals. Maybe some 1% will be happy.
 
Ukraine is negotiating with IMF about next additional loans pakcage ~8.1 b $.

I will explain that IMF always reccomends the same things and nothing had changed for IMF 40 years in row. Nothing.
They doesn't have experience with succesful loans for countries in war so are 100% noobs and diletants in such situations. Reality.

So casual IMF advises are to privatize gov owned properties in order to get $ for budget.
However in countries in war or recently after war such properties does have low market price. Maybe building had market price 1m, now does have short term real market price 100 k ....
Plus majority of most valuable stuff had been privatized and sold long before huelensky took office....LONG before....
 
Next stuff is usual advises to reduce budget expenses....
And to increase budget income by rising tariffs, duties payments, fees, VAT, excise tax, income tax etc stuff.

Plus usually is reccomended gradually devalue national currency in order to reduce import and increase export.
 
Taliban envoy in Moscow told that if Russia does have problems with workforce, Putin might offer working visas for ppl from Afganistan. He told that ppl does respect classic religious values and will build also a lot of mosques in Russia.
 
If to talk about Russia, Taliban offer is really more effective than nuke vs russia. They told that they does have religious ppl respecting classic traditional values and are assuming that russia might get some 500 000 - 2 000 000 immigrants from Afganistan if they will be granted permanent residence permits. Especially had been mentioned that due to respect for classic values Afganistan does have high birthrate and good demographic trend.
 

To strike something in transport mode is relatively easily....

__
However S 300 system does have xx versions and only some (!) V versions launchers does have just 2 missiles TK ( containers ) .... usually other types from S 300 does have 4 containers on one TEL ( launcher ).

Version with just 2 containers on launcher is using most expensive missiles from S 300 family : these are very expensive, mainly intended to counter ballistic missiles and fast aerodynamic targets........
 
S 300 V does have 4 iterations, latest two are more or lesser actual today.
Their development had been started to finance when Gorbachev ordered to sign financing bills for this.
 
BTW unfortunately ukr doesn't have any latest S 300 V iterations.
vs these stuff like Mig 31 if in engagement range does have 0 chances. 0 hope.
They might shot down also Thocka U, Lance, Pershing. wh. etc but with not 100% chances....
Most likely also Iskander....


Number of missiles for V latest iterations is limited cos they are very expensive. Iskander is cheap if compare with these....really cheap ....
 
When I was supporting F-15Es in Iraq they would hit Iraqi sam systems and the missiles would go flying all over the place. They were a little different though, it was 3-4 missiles sitting on a rack.
TEL with 3 open missiles without containers on a rack is KUB SAM.
TEL with 4 open missiles without containers on a rack is BUK family SAM.

S 300 always does have cylindrical containers.... missile before launch is in container from where it is also launched.

Also openly on rack are S 125 missiles, 2 or 4 openly visible missiles on rack. These usually are stationary, however some stuff might been installed on wheeled or tracked chassis.
 
As for SAM systems, battery does have multiple launchers and CP/ KP plus radars...one or multiple radars.



Radars are most vulnerable part of SAM systems because even if radar antenna isn't smashed completely, still with damage impacting geometry just a bit, radar is DISABLED, will not function normally.

Radars are even more fragile than command/ control or communications posts....not alone launchers...


If SAM system uses separate radars as mandatory part for egagement .... then IF radars are disabled, launchers and CP/ KP are ....useless.....
 
S 300 V usually does have TELs with tracked chassis with 4 or 2 cylindrical containers.
ABMs are these where 2 cylindrical containers. These are longer and most expensive missiles ( these where 2 containers on TEL ) ...

Other iterations of S 300 family uses wheeled launchers ....and 4 missiles per 1 TEL, cylindrical containers....
 
If enough ppl will be interested and IF I will have good mod and time, I might post some links to more or lesser normal pics with launchers and models....

However maybe better then to do this in separate thread? Without political comments ? Just for example " launchers pics "?
 
Back
Top