- Joined
- Nov 19, 2011
- Messages
- 58,321
- Reaction score
- 116,296
Good.
Good
Deal.EU should hold money from the US
Why did you cut off the rest? DId you even take a look at the video from Ryan a 20 year Army vet now a newsmax reporter? He explains in detail how Ukraine thanks the US and could be very valuable to the US in case they have Russia attack Alaska? Out of the question Putin already said as much.Deal.
Because 'should,' rather than 'should have,' implies current actions.Why did you cut off the rest?
To stop send money to UN is excellent idea....Because 'should,' rather than 'should have,' implies current actions.
The EU should stop sending money to the US. Full stop.
We'll stop sending money to the UN, and European countries can develop their own militaries more rather than relying on America's military to protect them.
Don't you know about huge batches ordered to purchase from U.S?European countries can develop their own militaries more rather than relying on America's military to protect them.
America completely funds the UN.In UN veto rights does have China and Russia.
You misunderstood what a 'deal' is to not send money.Don't you know about huge batches ordered to purchase from U.S?
OK, avionics, airplanes...besides this U.S should deliver 222 tanks and 520 MRLS launchers...etc stuff.
This guy is a reporter for Newmax he is a retired Army Vet. he took a trip to Poland and Europe.
I mentioned weapons european countries already contracted to purchase. Ofc for money ...however these aren't for Ukraine....they will not be sent to Ukr...America completely funds the UN.
You misunderstood what a 'deal' is to not send money.
It meant 'no deal.'
Because if the EU isn't sending money to the US for weapons etc, it means there is 'no deal.'
You're not living under the delusion Russia is going to invade Europe, right?
I wonder how this will bold for US weapons sales. All those F-35 contracts might not go as planned if our allies lose trust in us, and ultimately American tax payers have to foot the bill. France was the smart one developing their own fighter.I mentioned weapons european countries already contracted to purchase. Ofc for money ...however these aren't for Ukraine....they will not be sent to Ukr...
Didn't you know that U.S is selling weapons? For money ofc... or you think that they are selling for 0 cent and now when Trump is in office just then will start to PURCHASE weapons????
However these Ukr not likely will get.
For Ukr there is ....most likely will be additional orders....however not likely Ukr will get F 35 etc ...
....
mentioned weapons european countries already contracted to purchase. Ofc for money ...however these aren't for Ukraine....they will not be sent to Ukr...
Everybody knows that too.Didn't you know that U.S is selling weapons?
3 for 3 in saying things that everybody knows.However these Ukr not likely will get.
I guess you didnt recently hear Putin ,Lavrov and Peskov all say that it is non negotiable to settle with anything less then the 4 annexed Oblasts. And at the rate they are going how long do you think it will take to get them all back?Yes, there will be a negotiated settlement.
Ukraine can let Russia keep 20% of territory conquered and still remain a sovereign (corrupt) nation.
If Ukraine continues with this conflict, it is likely to lose 40% of the country to Russia.
No, that's what his brains are like.I bet you have teeth like baked beans
Now, now, don't insult pigs by comparing them to San Marino.He very obviously wants the whole country, you bloviating man pig