Again, what does that have to do with the fighting in the front lines? Also, based on your video, why hasn't Russia launched a missile strike against Ukraine yet?Can a B-1 bomber launch cruise missiles if it's on the ground and missing a wing?
Again, what does that have to do with the fighting in the front lines? Also, based on your video, why hasn't Russia launched a missile strike against Ukraine yet?
Indeed, while the Ukrainians are worried about old bombers deep inside Russian air bases. This is why Ukraine is losing this conflict. They can't get their priorities straight.Russia managed to capture next small village in Sumy oblast.
Ah, okay. So, all Russian missiles are launched from planes? I thought I read somewhere that Russia had hundreds of ground-to-ground missiles ready to be launched at Ukraine.You cannot launch the largest cruise missile attack on a country if your planes are broken and burning on the tarmac.
Ah, okay. So, all Russian missiles are launched from planes? I thought I read somewhere that Russia had hundreds of ground-to-ground missiles ready to be launched at Ukraine.
Not yesterday, but there is still tomorrow.That didn't do them much good yesterday, did it?
(seems I messed up the quoting function. Never mind, im sure Ruthless Ryan sees in anyway )
7B worth of airplanes destroyed or seriously damaged.
reportedly just over 40 bombers and AWACS
This is dumb even for you.Indeed, while the Ukrainians are worried about old bombers deep inside Russian air bases. This is why Ukraine is losing this conflict. They can't get their priorities straight.
I read somewhere that it was estimated that over 2000 missiles were launched from those destroyed airplanes. But apparently according to some, it's non-consequential for the course of this war.Russia will be able to replace A 50 ....of again will delay scheduled deliveries for India... next year...
Question is does they have " dish " radar already manufactured or no.
Tu 95 they can't replace because they doesn't produce them anymore.
They loved to use these to launch cruise missiles on Ukr... because by using Tu 95 they might launch cruise missiles when airplane is far away from ykr borders ...in safety.
Tu 95 is very valuable for russia also cos one very important reason : it is usable to launch wide range of cruise missiles models, from 1970 ies old models till modern their cruise missiles.
It is rumoured that russia had continued to invest a lot to keep their Tu 95 fleet usable because they does have a lot of adapters for their weapons ( bombs ) bays ....in order easy to use different cruise missiles models.
They are in mad mode and searching for possible informants and saboteurs in russia with vigor and for a reason.I read somewhere that it was estimated that over 2000 missiles were launched from those destroyed airplanes. But apparently according to some, it's non-consequential for the course of this war.
Also the russians will be paranoiac now and will try to hide their airplanes in hangars and such, rather than have them be "sitting ducks" on the airfield. They wont be able to take off and launch missiles at a moments notice, taxying the planes to and from hangars takes awhile. Overall, this was such a great move by and for the Ukrainians!
Not quite the whole picture:I read somewhere that it was estimated that over 2000 missiles were launched from those destroyed airplanes. But apparently according to some, it's non-consequential for the course of this war.
Also the russians will be paranoiac now and will try to hide their airplanes in hangars and such, rather than have them be "sitting ducks" on the airfield. They wont be able to take off and launch missiles at a moments notice, taxying the planes to and from hangars takes awhile. Overall, this was such a great move by and for the Ukrainians!
Let me break it down to you in village idiot terms. You have a gun. I take it away. You say "It doesnt matter, I have hundreds of boxes of bullets and can make a dozen every week". See where I am going? It doesnt mateer because you cant shoot those bullets.Not quite the whole picture:
Ukraine intel: Russia sits on missile mountain, churns out dozens monthly
MSN
Despite the devastating blow to Russia’s strategic aviation, the enemy still possesses substantial missile stockpiles, including:
・Almost 600 Iskander-M ballistic missiles
・More than 100 Kinzhal hypersonic aeroballistic missiles
・Almost 300 Iskander-K cruise missiles
・More than 300 Kh-101 cruise missiles
・More than 400 Kalibr cruise missiles
・Up to 300 Kh-22/32 cruise missiles
・700 Onyx cruise missiles and Zircon hypersonic missiles
・60 KN-23 North Korean ballistic missiles.
There are also about 11,000 anti-aircraft guided missiles for the S-300P/S-400 air defense systems.
Russia Is ‘Grinding Down’ Ukraine To Victory Right Before Our Eyes
MSN
. Russia is reportedly achieving its core objectives in Ukraine—securing annexed eastern oblasts, maintaining a land bridge to Crimea, and ensuring Ukraine's non-NATO, neutralized status—through a disciplined war of attrition, not by holding back out of fear of Western escalation.
. Despite Ukrainian counter-efforts, like a recent bomber strike deep into Russia, Moscow advances by fighting "smarter, not harder," leveraging superior artillery production, a resilient wartime economy, and Ukraine's mounting manpower crisis.
. This approach, focused on limited, achievable goals rather than total conquest, suggests Russia is on track to win on its terms, a reality the West has yet to fully acknowledge.
. Russia is not holding back in Ukraine because it’s afraid. It’s holding back because it doesn’t have to do more to win. That’s the part no one in Washington or Brussels wants to admit.
. Even yesterday’s dramatic Ukrainian bomber strike deep inside Russian territory – a bold, almost theatrical move designed to reassure Western sponsors – does not change the reality on the battlefield. Russia is advancing. Ukraine is eroding. And the war is being waged on Moscow’s terms.
. That doesn’t mean Russia wants to conquer all of Ukraine. It doesn’t. These are not the aims of a state pursuing some neo-imperial fantasy. They are limited, achievable objectives grounded in traditional strategic logic. Western commentators still insist that Russia’s goal is the total absorption of Ukraine.
. That’s why so much of the Russian military remains uncommitted. The air force has not been unleashed in full. Long-range missile strikes are calculated and limited. Elite ground units are rotated and preserved. Mobilization has been partial and politically controlled.
* If this is the best Ukraine can do against Russia, they have this conflict lost. Ukraine is currently losing the war on the battlefront where it counts. Russia is adding two Division of soldiers to this conflict per month. ...and we are still waiting for Russia's retaliation for Monday's strike. How many innocent Ukrainian civilians will die as a result of that? I guess those 'brilliant' Ukrainian tacticians did not think of that. Unfortunately, Ukraine was doomed from 24 February 2022. A valiant effort by the Ukrainians, but a loss like the US had in Vietnam.
No.Let me break it down to you in village idiot terms. You have a gun. I take it away. You say "It doesnt matter, I have hundreds of boxes of bullets and can make a dozen every week". See where I am going?